Upper and lower extremity robotic devices for rehabilitation and for studying motor control

Purpose of reviewThe successful motor rehabilitation of stroke, traumatic brain-injured and spinal cord-injured patients requires an intensive and task-specific therapy approach. Budget constraints limit a hand-to-hand therapy approach, so that intelligent machines may offer a solution to promote motor recovery and obtain a better understanding of motor control. This new field of automated or robot-assisted motor rehabilitation has emerged since the 1990s. Recent findingsThis article will present clinically viable devices for upper and lower extremity rehabilitation. The MIT-Manus and the Mirror-Image Motion Enabler robot, which enable unrestricted unilateral or bilateral shoulder and elbow movement, consistently proved superior on the motor impairment level. The ARM guide, which assisted reaching in a straight-line trajectory, and the Bi-Manu-Track, which enabled the bilateral practice of a forearm and wrist movement, are currently being tested. For gait rehabilitation after stroke, the electromechanical gait trainer, GT I, has proved effective compared with treadmill training with body weight support. The Lokomat, consisting of a treadmill and a powered exoskeleton, lessened the therapeutic effort compared with manually assisted treadmill training in spinal cord-injured patients. Future developments will see more degrees of freedom, improved man-machine interaction and the implementation of virtual reality. SummaryTechnical possibilities are one aspect, but multi-centre trials and a consideration of the unsubstantiated fears among therapists of being replaced by machines will decide on the successful implementation of this most promising field to the benefit of patients.

[1]  V. Dvoirin [Randomized clinical trials]. , 1982, Voprosy onkologii.

[2]  N. Miller,et al.  Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  M. Maležič,et al.  Treadmill training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients. , 1995, Stroke.

[4]  N. Hogan,et al.  The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. , 1997, Archives of neurology.

[5]  D B Matchar,et al.  Incidence and occurrence of total (first-ever and recurrent) stroke. , 1999, Stroke.

[6]  B. Dobkin An Overview of Treadmill Locomotor Training with Partial Body Weight Support: A Neurophysiologically Sound Approach Whose Time Has Come for Randomized Clinical Trials , 1999 .

[7]  N. Hogan,et al.  Robot training enhanced motor outcome in patients with stroke maintained over 3 years , 1999, Neurology.

[8]  S. Hesse,et al.  Development of an Advanced Mechanised Gait Trainer, Controlling Movement of the Centre of Mass, for Restoring Gait in Non-ambulant Subjects - Weiterentwicklung eines mechanisierten Gangtrainers mit Steuerung des Massenschwerpunktes zur Gangrehabilitation rollstuhlpflichtiger Patienten , 1999, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[9]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[10]  V. Dietz,et al.  Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[11]  N. Hogan,et al.  A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation , 2000, Neurology.

[12]  H. F. Machiel van der Loos,et al.  Development of robots for rehabilitation therapy: the Palo Alto VA/Stanford experience. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[13]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  A robotic stepper for retraining locomotion in spinal-injured rodents , 2000, Proceedings 2000 ICRA. Millennium Conference. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Symposia Proceedings (Cat. No.00CH37065).

[14]  W. Rymer,et al.  Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: progress with the ARM guide. , 2014, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[15]  N. Hogan,et al.  Is robot-aided sensorimotor training in stroke rehabilitation a realistic option? , 2001, Current opinion in neurology.

[16]  S. Hesse,et al.  An Electromechanical Gait Trainer for Restoration of Gait in Hemiparetic Stroke Patients: Preliminary Results , 2001, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[17]  V. Dietz,et al.  Driven gait orthosis for improvement of locomotor training in paraplegic patients , 2001, Spinal Cord.

[18]  C. Burgar,et al.  Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[19]  S. Hesse,et al.  Treadmill Training With Partial Body Weight Support and an Electromechanical Gait Trainer for Restoration of Gait in Subacute Stroke Patients: A Randomized Crossover Study , 2002, Stroke.

[20]  Stefan Hesse,et al.  Design of a robotic walking simulator for neurological rehabilitation , 2002, IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[21]  Paolo Gallina,et al.  NeRebot: a wire-based robot for neurorehabilitation , 2003 .

[22]  S. Hesse,et al.  Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  N. Hogan,et al.  Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[24]  W. Harwin,et al.  The effect of GENTLE/s robot mediated therapy on upper extremity function post stroke , 2003 .