EXHAUSTIVE SEARCH: DOES IT HAVE A ROLE IN EXPLORATIVE DESIGN?

Building performance simulation (BPS) is used routinely in design practice to evaluate the performance of candidate design solutions. However, two sources of uncertainty exist in the design process: in the selection of an optimum design solution; and in the predicted performance of the building (say, due to uncertain boundary conditions). These uncertainties can be evaluated and reduced through the use of an “explorative design” process, in which uncertainty quantification, multi-objective optimization, and sensitivity analysis are combined to provide information on the choice of robust and optimal design solutions. This paper investigates the use of an exhaustive search method to sample all combinations of design solutions and uncertain boundary conditions. The number of samples, and therefore the range of designs considered, are limited by the computation time of BPS. However, this paper concludes that design standards can be used to identify a viable range of design options, and that an exhaustive search applied to a limited design space provided enough information to identify and select robust design solutions. The paper also demonstrates the use of a new approach to identifying robust solutions that are guaranteed to remain optimal, regardless of the prevailing uncertainty in the boundary conditions.

[1]  R. Judkoff,et al.  International Energy Agency building energy simulation test (BESTEST) and diagnostic method , 1995 .

[2]  Godfried Augenbroe,et al.  Multi-criteria decision making under uncertainty in building performance assessment , 2013 .

[3]  Michael J. Davies,et al.  Employing A Multi-Objective Robust Optimisation Method for Healthy And Low-Energy Dwelling Design in Delhi, India , 2015, Building Simulation Conference Proceedings.

[4]  Ralph Evins,et al.  A review of computational optimisation methods applied to sustainable building design , 2013 .

[5]  Darren Robinson,et al.  A generalised stochastic model for the simulation of occupant presence , 2008 .

[6]  Jonathan A. Wright,et al.  Constrained, mixed-integer and multi-objective optimisation of building designs by NSGA-II with fitness approximation , 2015, Appl. Soft Comput..

[7]  Standard Ashrae Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy , 1992 .

[8]  Jonathan A. Wright,et al.  SOLUTION ANALYSIS IN MULTI-OBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION , 2012 .

[9]  Alessandro Prada,et al.  Influence of the Representativeness of Reference Weather Data in Multi-Objective Optimization of Building Refurbishment , 2015, Building Simulation Conference Proceedings.

[10]  Kay Chen Tan,et al.  Evolutionary Multi-objective Optimization in Uncertain Environments - Issues and Algorithms , 2009, Studies in Computational Intelligence.

[11]  Dino Bouchlaghem,et al.  Estimating the energy consumption and power demand of small power equipment in office buildings , 2014 .

[12]  Ruchi Choudhary,et al.  Optimum building energy retrofits under technical and economic uncertainty , 2013 .

[13]  Staf Roels,et al.  Probabilistic design and analysis of building performances: methodology and application example , 2014 .