Prediction of physical protein–protein interactions

Many essential cellular processes such as signal transduction, transport, cellular motion and most regulatory mechanisms are mediated by protein-protein interactions. In recent years, new experimental techniques have been developed to discover the protein-protein interaction networks of several organisms. However, the accuracy and coverage of these techniques have proven to be limited, and computational approaches remain essential both to assist in the design and validation of experimental studies and for the prediction of interaction partners and detailed structures of protein complexes. Here, we provide a critical overview of existing structure-independent and structure-based computational methods. Although these techniques have significantly advanced in the past few years, we find that most of them are still in their infancy. We also provide an overview of experimental techniques for the detection of protein-protein interactions. Although the developments are promising, false positive and false negative results are common, and reliable detection is possible only by taking a consensus of different experimental approaches. The shortcomings of experimental techniques affect both the further development and the fair evaluation of computational prediction methods. For an adequate comparative evaluation of prediction and high-throughput experimental methods, an appropriately large benchmark set of biophysically characterized protein complexes would be needed, but is sorely lacking.

[1]  Carl Frieden Protein-protein interaction and enzymatic activity. , 1971, Annual review of biochemistry.

[2]  Rspm μgm Methods , 1972 .

[3]  J. Davies,et al.  Molecular Biology of the Cell , 1983, Bristol Medico-Chirurgical Journal.

[4]  M. L. Connolly Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids. , 1983, Science.

[5]  S. Fields,et al.  A novel genetic system to detect protein–protein interactions , 1989, Nature.

[6]  A. Ben-Naim Solvent effects on protein association and protein folding , 1990, Biopolymers.

[7]  R Henderson,et al.  The structure of bacteriorhodopsin and its relevance to the visual opsins and other seven-helix G-protein coupled receptors. , 1990, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[8]  M. Sippl Calculation of conformational ensembles from potentials of mean force. An approach to the knowledge-based prediction of local structures in globular proteins. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  S. Kim,et al.  "Soft docking": matching of molecular surface cubes. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  J. Wells,et al.  Systematic mutational analyses of protein-protein interfaces. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[11]  E. Katchalski‐Katzir,et al.  Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  T. Blundell,et al.  Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  AC Tose Cell , 1993, Cell.

[14]  M. Lawrence,et al.  Shape complementarity at protein/protein interfaces. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Essential dynamics of proteins , 1993, Proteins.

[16]  D Fischer,et al.  Molecular surface representations by sparse critical points , 1994, Proteins.

[17]  D. Covell,et al.  A role for surface hydrophobicity in protein‐protein recognition , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[18]  B. Honig,et al.  Classical electrostatics in biology and chemistry. , 1995, Science.

[19]  J. Janin,et al.  Protein-protein recognition. , 1995, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[20]  I. Vakser Protein docking for low-resolution structures. , 1995, Protein engineering.

[21]  A. Finkelstein,et al.  Why do protein architectures have boltzmann‐like statistics? , 1995, Proteins.

[22]  A. V. Grimstone Molecular biology of the cell (3rd edn) , 1995 .

[23]  Francis Rodier,et al.  Protein–protein interaction at crystal contacts , 1995, Proteins.

[24]  R Henderson,et al.  Electron-crystallographic refinement of the structure of bacteriorhodopsin. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  S. Jones,et al.  Principles of protein-protein interactions. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  A. Fersht,et al.  Rapid, electrostatically assisted association of proteins , 1996, Nature Structural Biology.

[27]  K. Dill,et al.  Statistical potentials extracted from protein structures: how accurate are they? , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[28]  I. Vakser Low-resolution docking: prediction of complexes for underdetermined structures. , 1998, Biopolymers.

[29]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Residue-residue potentials with a favorable contact pair term and an unfavorable high packing density term, for simulation and threading. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[30]  F. Cohen,et al.  An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  Oliviero Carugo,et al.  Protein—protein crystal‐packing contacts , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[32]  A. Ben-Naim STATISTICAL POTENTIALS EXTRACTED FROM PROTEIN STRUCTURES : ARE THESE MEANINGFUL POTENTIALS? , 1997 .

[33]  A. Valencia,et al.  Correlated mutations contain information about protein-protein interaction. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  S. Jones,et al.  Analysis of protein-protein interaction sites using surface patches. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[35]  R. Riek,et al.  Attenuated T2 relaxation by mutual cancellation of dipole-dipole coupling and chemical shift anisotropy indicates an avenue to NMR structures of very large biological macromolecules in solution. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Modelling protein docking using shape complementarity, electrostatics and biochemical information. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  F. Melo,et al.  Novel knowledge-based mean force potential at atomic level. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[38]  A. Finkelstein,et al.  Residue-residue mean-force potentials for protein structure recognition. , 1997, Protein engineering.

[39]  A J Olson,et al.  Morphology of protein-protein interfaces. , 1998, Structure.

[40]  J Skolnick,et al.  How do potentials derived from structural databases relate to “true” potentials? , 1998, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[41]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Rapid refinement of protein interfaces incorporating solvation: application to the docking problem. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[42]  T. Gaasterland,et al.  Microbial genescapes: phyletic and functional patterns of ORF distribution among prokaryotes. , 1998, Microbial & comparative genomics.

[43]  A. Bogan,et al.  Anatomy of hot spots in protein interfaces. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[44]  Kenneth H. Downing,et al.  Structure of the αβ tubulin dimer by electron crystallography , 1998, Nature.

[45]  M J Sternberg,et al.  Predictive docking of protein-protein and protein-DNA complexes. , 1998, Current opinion in structural biology.

[46]  J. Thornton,et al.  PQS: a protein quaternary structure file server. , 1998, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[47]  R Nussinov,et al.  Flexible docking allowing induced fit in proteins: Insights from an open to closed conformational isomers , 1998, Proteins.

[48]  B. Snel,et al.  Conservation of gene order: a fingerprint of proteins that physically interact. , 1998, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[49]  T Gaasterland,et al.  Constructing multigenome views of whole microbial genomes. , 1998, Microbial & comparative genomics.

[50]  R M Jackson,et al.  Comparison of protein–protein interactions in serine protease‐inhibitor and antibody‐antigen complexes: Implications for the protein docking problem , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[51]  R J Leatherbarrow,et al.  Analysis of molecular recognition using optical biosensors. , 1999, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[52]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Detecting protein function and protein-protein interactions from genome sequences. , 1999, Science.

[53]  S Vajda,et al.  Free energy landscapes of encounter complexes in protein-protein association. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[54]  R. Overbeek,et al.  The use of gene clusters to infer functional coupling. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[55]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Pair potentials for protein folding: Choice of reference states and sensitivity of predicted native states to variations in the interaction schemes , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[56]  M. Karplus,et al.  Effective energy function for proteins in solution , 1999, Proteins.

[57]  C. Chothia,et al.  The atomic structure of protein-protein recognition sites. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[58]  B. Séraphin,et al.  A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[59]  M J Sternberg,et al.  Use of pair potentials across protein interfaces in screening predicted docked complexes , 1999, Proteins.

[60]  Anton J. Enright,et al.  Protein interaction maps for complete genomes based on gene fusion events , 1999, Nature.

[61]  A Kolinski,et al.  Correlation between knowledge‐based and detailed atomic potentials: Application to the unfolding of the GCN4 leucine zipper , 1999, Proteins.

[62]  M. Sternberg,et al.  An analysis of conformational changes on protein-protein association: implications for predictive docking. , 1999, Protein engineering.

[63]  C S Raman,et al.  Isothermal titration calorimetry of protein-protein interactions. , 1999, Methods.

[64]  Jérôme Gouzy,et al.  ProDom and ProDom-CG: tools for protein domain analysis and whole genome comparisons , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[65]  N. Linial,et al.  On the design and analysis of protein folding potentials , 2000, Proteins.

[66]  Hideo Takahashi,et al.  A novel NMR method for determining the interfaces of large protein–protein complexes , 2000, Nature Structural Biology.

[67]  Sophia Tsoka,et al.  Prediction of protein interactions: metabolic enzymes are frequently involved in gene fusion , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[68]  P E Bourne,et al.  The Protein Data Bank. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[69]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Conservation of polar residues as hot spots at protein interfaces , 2000, Proteins.

[70]  James R. Knight,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000, Nature.

[71]  J R Yates,et al.  Mass spectrometry. From genomics to proteomics. , 2000, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[72]  Warren C. Lathe,et al.  Predicting protein function by genomic context: quantitative evaluation and qualitative inferences. , 2000, Genome research.

[73]  R. M. Burnett,et al.  DARWIN: A program for docking flexible molecules , 2000, Proteins.

[74]  S. Vajda,et al.  Scoring docked conformations generated by rigid‐body protein‐protein docking , 2000, Proteins.

[75]  M. Mann,et al.  A generic strategy to analyze the spatial organization of multi-protein complexes by cross-linking and mass spectrometry. , 2000, Analytical chemistry.

[76]  김삼묘,et al.  “Bioinformatics” 특집을 내면서 , 2000 .

[77]  J. Thornton,et al.  Discriminating between homodimeric and monomeric proteins in the crystalline state , 2000, Proteins.

[78]  L. Krippahl,et al.  BiGGER: A new (soft) docking algorithm for predicting protein interactions , 2000, Proteins.

[79]  H. Gaub,et al.  Force spectroscopy with single bio-molecules. , 2000, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[80]  D. Ritchie,et al.  Protein docking using spherical polar Fourier correlations , 2000, Proteins.

[81]  F. Cohen,et al.  Co-evolution of proteins with their interaction partners. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[82]  R. Riek,et al.  TROSY and CRINEPT: NMR with large molecular and supramolecular structures in solution. , 2000, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[83]  Michael Y. Galperin,et al.  Who's your neighbor? New computational approaches for functional genomics , 2000, Nature Biotechnology.

[84]  A. Valencia,et al.  Similarity of phylogenetic trees as indicator of protein-protein interaction. , 2001, Protein engineering.

[85]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Automated structure-based prediction of functional sites in proteins: applications to assessing the validity of inheriting protein function from homology in genome annotation and to protein docking. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[86]  M. Vidal,et al.  Identification of potential interaction networks using sequence-based searches for conserved protein-protein interactions or "interologs". , 2001, Genome research.

[87]  Ioannis Xenarios,et al.  DIP: The Database of Interacting Proteins: 2001 update , 2001, Nucleic Acids Res..

[88]  S Vajda,et al.  Dynamical view of the positions of key side chains in protein-protein recognition. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[89]  J. Skolnick,et al.  A distance‐dependent atomic knowledge‐based potential for improved protein structure selection , 2001, Proteins.

[90]  J Skolnick,et al.  Defrosting the frozen approximation: PROSPECTOR— A new approach to threading , 2001, Proteins.

[91]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Three-dimensional cluster analysis identifies interfaces and functional residue clusters in proteins. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[92]  Marek S. Skrzypek,et al.  YPDTM, PombePDTM and WormPDTM: model organism volumes of the BioKnowledgeTM Library, an integrated resource for protein information , 2001, Nucleic Acids Res..

[93]  Eleanor J. Gardiner,et al.  Protein docking using a genetic algorithm , 2001, Proteins.

[94]  Gary D Bader,et al.  BIND--The Biomolecular Interaction Network Database. , 2001, Nucleic acids research.

[95]  A. Cochran,et al.  Protein-protein interfaces: mimics and inhibitors. , 2001, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[96]  C. DeLisi,et al.  Genes linked by fusion events are generally of the same functional category: A systematic analysis of 30 microbial genomes , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[97]  J M Gauthier,et al.  Protein--protein interaction maps: a lead towards cellular functions. , 2001, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[98]  R. Ozawa,et al.  A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[99]  N. Ben-Tal,et al.  Residue frequencies and pairing preferences at protein–protein interfaces , 2001, Proteins.

[100]  Kurt S. Thorn,et al.  ASEdb: a database of alanine mutations and their effects on the free energy of binding in protein interactions , 2001, Bioinform..

[101]  L. T. Ten Eyck,et al.  Protein docking using continuum electrostatics and geometric fit. , 2001, Protein engineering.

[102]  Ioannis Xenarios,et al.  Mining literature for protein-protein interactions , 2001, Bioinform..

[103]  Wolfgang Baumeister,et al.  Electron tomography: towards visualizing the molecular organization of the cytoplasm. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[104]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry , 2002, Nature.

[105]  D. Baker,et al.  A simple physical model for binding energy hot spots in protein–protein complexes , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[106]  Kurt Wüthrich,et al.  NMR analysis of a 900K GroEL–GroES complex , 2002, Nature.

[107]  Christian von Mering,et al.  Genome organization: Teamed up for transcription , 2002, Nature.

[108]  Zhiping Weng,et al.  Docking unbound proteins using shape complementarity, desolvation, and electrostatics , 2002, Proteins.

[109]  Patrick Aloy,et al.  The third dimension for protein interactions and complexes. , 2002, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[110]  Joel D. Martin,et al.  PreBIND and Textomy – mining the biomedical literature for protein-protein interactions using a support vector machine , 2003, BMC Bioinformatics.

[111]  M. Sternberg,et al.  Prediction of protein-protein interactions by docking methods. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[112]  O. Lichtarge,et al.  Evolutionary predictions of binding surfaces and interactions. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[113]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Analyzing yeast protein–protein interaction data obtained from different sources , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[114]  W. Delano Unraveling hot spots in binding interfaces: progress and challenges. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[115]  A. Valencia,et al.  In silico two‐hybrid system for the selection of physically interacting protein pairs , 2002, Proteins.

[116]  A. Valencia,et al.  Prediction of protein--protein interaction sites in heterocomplexes with neural networks. , 2002, European journal of biochemistry.

[117]  P. Bork,et al.  Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes , 2002, Nature.

[118]  C. Deane,et al.  Protein Interactions , 2002, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[119]  B. Snel,et al.  Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein–protein interactions , 2002, Nature.

[120]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Soft protein–protein docking in internal coordinates , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[121]  M. Mann,et al.  Large-scale Proteomic Analysis of the Human Spliceosome References , 2006 .

[122]  A. Valencia,et al.  Computational methods for the prediction of protein interactions. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[123]  Steven P. Gygi,et al.  Comprehensive proteomic analysis of the human spliceosome , 2002, Nature.

[124]  Hui Lu,et al.  MULTIPROSPECTOR: An algorithm for the prediction of protein–protein interactions by multimeric threading , 2002, Proteins.

[125]  Peer Bork,et al.  A complex prediction: three‐dimensional model of the yeast exosome , 2002, EMBO reports.

[126]  J. Janin,et al.  Dissecting protein–protein recognition sites , 2002, Proteins.

[127]  Patrick Aloy,et al.  Interrogating protein interaction networks through structural biology , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[128]  Chern-Sing Goh,et al.  Co-evolutionary analysis reveals insights into protein-protein interactions. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[129]  Barry Honig,et al.  On the role of electrostatic interactions in the design of protein-protein interfaces. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[130]  Hongyi Zhou,et al.  Distance‐scaled, finite ideal‐gas reference state improves structure‐derived potentials of mean force for structure selection and stability prediction , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[131]  Frank Sobott,et al.  Protein complexes gain momentum. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[132]  Zhirong Sun,et al.  Proteins with Class α/β Fold Have High-level Participation in Fusion Events , 2002 .

[133]  Ilya A Vakser,et al.  Docking of protein models , 2002, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[134]  Pierre Legrain,et al.  Prediction, assessment and validation of protein interaction maps in bacteria. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[135]  B. Rost,et al.  Analysing six types of protein-protein interfaces. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[136]  B. Snel,et al.  Systematic discovery of analogous enzymes in thiamin biosynthesis , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[137]  Sandor Vajda,et al.  CAPRI: A Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions , 2003, Proteins.

[138]  B. Snel,et al.  Function prediction and protein networks. , 2003, Current opinion in cell biology.

[139]  C. Dominguez,et al.  HADDOCK: a protein-protein docking approach based on biochemical or biophysical information. , 2003, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[140]  J. Skolnick,et al.  The PDB is a covering set of small protein structures. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[141]  D. Eisenberg,et al.  Computational methods of analysis of protein-protein interactions. , 2003, Current opinion in structural biology.

[142]  M. S. Chapman,et al.  Study of the Structural Dynamics of the E. coli 70S Ribosome Using Real-Space Refinement , 2003, Cell.

[143]  J. Thornton,et al.  Diversity of protein–protein interactions , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[144]  Hui Lu,et al.  Multimeric threading-based prediction of protein-protein interactions on a genomic scale: application to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteome. , 2003, Genome research.

[145]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Taking geometry to its edge: Fast unbound rigid (and hinge‐bent) docking , 2003, Proteins.

[146]  M. Eisenstein,et al.  Construction of molecular assemblies via docking: Modeling of tetramers with D2 symmetry , 2003, Proteins.

[147]  Kevin Truong,et al.  Domain fusion analysis by applying relational algebra to protein sequence and domain databases , 2003, BMC Bioinformatics.

[148]  David Neuhaus,et al.  Solution NMR study of the interaction between NTF2 and nucleoporin FxFG repeats. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[149]  B. Rost,et al.  Predicted protein–protein interaction sites from local sequence information , 2003, FEBS letters.

[150]  Christian von Mering,et al.  A comprehensive set of protein complexes in yeast: mining large scale protein-protein interaction screens , 2003, Bioinform..

[151]  See-Kiong Ng,et al.  InterDom: a database of putative interacting protein domains for validating predicted protein interactions and complexes , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[152]  James R. Knight,et al.  A Protein Interaction Map of Drosophila melanogaster , 2003, Science.

[153]  Hermann E. Gaub,et al.  DNA: A Programmable Force Sensor , 2003, Science.

[154]  L. Mirny,et al.  Protein complexes and functional modules in molecular networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[155]  Hui Lu,et al.  Development of unified statistical potentials describing protein-protein interactions. , 2003, Biophysical journal.

[156]  Arun K. Ramani,et al.  Exploiting the co-evolution of interacting proteins to discover interaction specificity. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[157]  Z. Weng,et al.  ZDOCK: An initial‐stage protein‐docking algorithm , 2003, Proteins.

[158]  L. Loew,et al.  Quantitative cell biology with the Virtual Cell. , 2003, Trends in cell biology.

[159]  Wendell A. Lim,et al.  Optimization of specificity in a cellular protein interaction network by negative selection , 2003, Nature.

[160]  D. Bu,et al.  Topological structure analysis of the protein-protein interaction network in budding yeast. , 2003, Nucleic acids research.

[161]  S. Wodak,et al.  Assessment of blind predictions of protein–protein interactions: Current status of docking methods , 2003, Proteins.

[162]  Miriam Eisenstein,et al.  Weighted geometric docking: Incorporating external information in the rotation‐translation scan , 2003, Proteins.

[163]  Joël Janin,et al.  Genome-wide studies of protein-protein interaction. , 2003, Current opinion in structural biology.

[164]  Ying Zhang,et al.  Visualization of membrane protein domains by cryo-electron microscopy of dengue virus , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[165]  M Eisenstein,et al.  Effect of local shape modifications of molecular surfaces on rigid-body protein-protein docking. , 2003, Protein engineering.

[166]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Mass spectrometry-based proteomics , 2003, Nature.

[167]  S. Fields,et al.  Protein analysis on a proteomic scale , 2003, Nature.

[168]  R. Russell,et al.  The relationship between sequence and interaction divergence in proteins. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[169]  Robert B. Russell,et al.  InterPreTS: protein Interaction Prediction through Tertiary Structure , 2003, Bioinform..

[170]  Maria Jesus Martin,et al.  The SWISS-PROT protein knowledgebase and its supplement TrEMBL in 2003 , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[171]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Global protein function prediction from protein-protein interaction networks , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[172]  Ceslovas Venclovas,et al.  Assessment of progress over the CASP experiments , 2003, Proteins.

[173]  H. Gaub,et al.  A force-based protein biochip , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[174]  D. Bailey,et al.  The Binding Interface Database (BID): A Compilation of Amino Acid Hot Spots in Protein Interfaces , 2003, Bioinform..

[175]  Tim J. P. Hubbard,et al.  What can we learn from noncoding regions of similarity between genomes? , 2003, BMC Bioinformatics.

[176]  Yu Zong Chen,et al.  KDBI: Kinetic Data of Bio-molecular Interactions database , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[177]  C. Li,et al.  A protein-protein docking algorithm dependent on the type of complexes. , 2003, Protein engineering.

[178]  Simon Kasif,et al.  Identification of functional links between genes using phylogenetic profiles , 2003, Bioinform..

[179]  J. Thornton,et al.  Structural characterisation and functional significance of transient protein-protein interactions. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[180]  T. Earnest,et al.  From words to literature in structural proteomics , 2003, Nature.

[181]  Jeffrey J. Gray,et al.  Protein-protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side-chain conformations. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[182]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Protein–protein interactions: Structurally conserved residues distinguish between binding sites and exposed protein surfaces , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[183]  Dmitrij Frishman,et al.  MIPS: analysis and annotation of proteins from whole genomes in 2005 , 2005, Nucleic Acids Res..

[184]  P. Bork,et al.  Structure-Based Assembly of Protein Complexes in Yeast , 2004, Science.

[185]  K. Melcher New chemical crosslinking methods for the identification of transient protein-protein interactions with multiprotein complexes. , 2004, Current protein & peptide science.

[186]  R. Abagyan,et al.  Identification of protein-protein interaction sites from docking energy landscapes. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[187]  J. Janin,et al.  A dissection of specific and non-specific protein-protein interfaces. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[188]  Susumu Goto,et al.  The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[189]  H. Wolfson,et al.  Protein-Protein Interactions: Coupling of Structurally Conserved Residues and of Hot Spots across Interfaces. Implications for Docking , 2004 .

[190]  Miriam Eisenstein,et al.  Hydrophobic complementarity in protein–protein docking , 2004, Proteins.

[191]  Martin Vingron,et al.  IntAct: an open source molecular interaction database , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[192]  S. L. Wong,et al.  A Map of the Interactome Network of the Metazoan C. elegans , 2004, Science.

[193]  S. Vajda,et al.  Protein-protein docking: is the glass half-full or half-empty? , 2004, Trends in biotechnology.

[194]  Huan‐Xiang Zhou Improving the understanding of human genetic diseases through predictions of protein structures and protein-protein interaction sites. , 2004, Current medicinal chemistry.

[195]  P. Bork,et al.  Analysis of genomic context: prediction of functional associations from conserved bidirectionally transcribed gene pairs , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[196]  Koh Takeuchi,et al.  Channel-forming Membrane Permeabilization by an Antibacterial Protein, Sapecin , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[197]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[198]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Analyzing protein function on a genomic scale: the importance of gold-standard positives and negatives for network prediction. , 2004, Current opinion in microbiology.

[199]  L. Castagnoli,et al.  Protein Interaction Networks by Proteome Peptide Scanning , 2004, PLoS biology.

[200]  Ilya A Vakser,et al.  Protein-protein interfaces are special. , 2004, Structure.

[201]  Tanja Kortemme,et al.  Computational design of protein-protein interactions. , 2004, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[202]  Patrick Aloy,et al.  Ten thousand interactions for the molecular biologist , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[203]  Réka Albert,et al.  Conserved network motifs allow protein-protein interaction prediction , 2004, Bioinform..

[204]  A. E. Hirsh,et al.  Coevolution of gene expression among interacting proteins , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[205]  S. Vajda,et al.  Anchor residues in protein-protein interactions. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[206]  Daniel R. Caffrey,et al.  Are protein–protein interfaces more conserved in sequence than the rest of the protein surface? , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[207]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Annotation transfer between genomes: protein-protein interologs and protein-DNA regulogs. , 2004, Genome research.

[208]  Hongyi Zhou,et al.  An accurate, residue‐level, pair potential of mean force for folding and binding based on the distance‐scaled, ideal‐gas reference state , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[209]  D. Kriegman,et al.  Automatic particle selection: results of a comparative study. , 2004, Journal of structural biology.

[210]  Frank Alber,et al.  A structural perspective on protein-protein interactions. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.

[211]  D. Baker,et al.  Computational redesign of protein-protein interaction specificity , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[212]  H. Wolfson,et al.  A new, structurally nonredundant, diverse data set of protein–protein interfaces and its implications , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[213]  Shoshana J Wodak,et al.  Prediction of protein-protein interactions: the CAPRI experiment, its evaluation and implications. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.

[214]  Gabriele Ausiello,et al.  MINT: the Molecular INTeraction database , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..