Cell reactions with biomaterials: the microscopies.

The methods and results of optical microscopy that can be used to observe cell reactions to biomaterials are Interference Reflection Microscopy (IRM), Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Microscopy (TIRFM), Surface Plasmon Resonance Microscopy (SPRM) and Förster Resonance Energy Transfer Microscopy (FRETM) and Standing Wave Fluorescence Microscopy. The last three are new developments, which have not yet been fully perfected. TIRFM and SPRM are evanescent wave methods. The physics of these methods depend upon optical phenomena at interfaces. All these methods give information on the dimensions of the gap between cell and the substratum to which it is adhering and thus are especially suited to work with biomaterials. IRM and FRETM can be used on opaque surfaces though image interpretation is especially difficult for IRM on a reflecting opaque surface. These methods are compared with several electron microscopical methods for studying cell adhesion to substrata. These methods all yield fairly consistent results and show that the cell to substratum distance on many materials is in the range 5 to 30 nm. The area of contact relative to the total projected area of the cell may vary from a few per cent to close to 100% depending on the cell type and substratum. These methods show that those discrete contact areas well known as focal contacts are frequently present. The results of FRETM suggest that the separation from the substratum even in a focal contact is about 5 nm.

[1]  B. Rahn,et al.  Microjet impingement followed by scanning electron microscopy as a qualitative technique to compare cellular adhesion to various biomaterials , 1995, Cell biology international.

[2]  R. Dunn,et al.  Scanning near-field fluorescence resonance energy transfer microscopy. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[3]  G. Elton Electroviscosity. I. The flow of liquids between surfaces in close proximity , 1948, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[4]  R. W. Gundersen Interference reflection microscopic study of dorsal root growth cones on different substrates: Assessment of growth cone–substrate contacts , 1988, Journal of neuroscience research.

[5]  Y. Usson,et al.  Quantitation of cell-matrix adhesion using confocal image analysis of focal contact associated proteins and interference reflection microscopy. , 1997, Cytometry.

[6]  H. Verschueren,et al.  Interference reflection microscopy in cell biology: methodology and applications. , 1985, Journal of cell science.

[7]  P. Fromherz,et al.  Fluorescence Interferometry of Neuronal Cell Adhesion on Microstructured Silicon , 1998 .

[8]  C. Wilkinson,et al.  Reactions of cells to topography. , 1998, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[9]  M. Opas Interference reflection microscopy of adhesion of Amoeba proteus , 1978, Journal of microscopy.

[10]  Y. Olsson,et al.  The blood-brain barrier to proteins under normal and pathological conditions. , 1970, Journal of the neurological sciences.

[11]  A. S. G. Curtis,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF TOPOGRAPHIC AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF MATERIALS ON CELL BEHAVIOR , 1990 .

[12]  P. Fromherz,et al.  Fluorescence interference-contrast microscopy of cell adhesion on oxidized silicon , 1997 .

[13]  C. S. Izzard,et al.  Cell-to-substrate contacts in living fibroblasts: an interference reflexion study with an evaluation of the technique. , 1976, Journal of cell science.

[14]  Peter Fromherz SELF-GATING OF ION CHANNELS IN CELL ADHESION , 1997 .

[15]  A. S. G. Curtis,et al.  THE MECHANISM OF ADHESION OF CELLS TO GLASS , 1964, The Journal of cell biology.

[16]  I. Gwynn,et al.  Backscattered electron imaging of the undersurface of resin‐embedded cells by field‐emission scanning electron microscopy , 1995, Journal of microscopy.

[17]  A. Lacey,et al.  Light microscopy in biology : a practical approach , 1989 .

[18]  J. Depasquale,et al.  Evidence for an actin-containing cytoplasmic precursor of the focal contact and the timing of incorporation of vinculin at the focal contact , 1987, The Journal of cell biology.

[19]  D. Gingell,et al.  Interference reflection microscopy. A quantitative theory for image interpretation and its application to cell-substratum separation measurement. , 1979, Biophysical journal.

[20]  C Bechinger,et al.  Imaging of cell/substrate contacts of living cells with surface plasmon resonance microscopy. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[21]  D. Axelrod Cell-substrate contacts illuminated by total internal reflection fluorescence , 1981, The Journal of cell biology.

[22]  W M Reichert,et al.  Application of total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy to study cell adhesion to biomaterials. , 1998, Biomaterials.

[23]  R. Payne,et al.  Growth cone interactions with purified cell and substrate adhesion molecules visualized by interference reflection microscopy. , 1997, Brain research. Developmental brain research.

[24]  D. Gingell,et al.  Topography of cell-glass apposition revealed by total internal reflection fluorescence of volume markers , 1985, The Journal of cell biology.