How to obtain high-accuracy image registration: application to movement correction of dynamic positron emission tomography data

Abstract. When registering dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) sequences, the time-dependent changes in uptake pattern prevent registration of all frames to the first frame in a straightforward manner. Instead, a sequential registration of each frame to its predecessor may be used, provided the registration algorithm is completely free of bias. It is shown that most existing algorithms introduce a bias, the size of which depends on the pixel size and the signal-to-noise ratio of the data. The bias is introduced by the pixelisation of the underlying continuous process. All existing cost-functions are more or less sensitive to noise, and the noise reduction resulting from translating one image set relative to the other means that a small movement will always be detected in the cases where no actual movement has occurred. The problem is solved by an initial resampling of the reference volume into a representation with another image and pixel size. If the new representation is sensibly chosen it means that all possible transforms applied to the other image volume will yield approximately the same noise reduction, thereby removing the source of the bias. The described effect is demonstrated on phantom data, and its impact is shown on human data.

[1]  John Suckling,et al.  Registration of dynamic dopamine D2 receptor images using principal component analysis , 1997, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  Y. Picard,et al.  Motion correction of PET images using multiple acquisition frames , 1995, 1995 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record.

[3]  B F Hutton,et al.  Use of 3D reconstruction to correct for patient motion in SPECT. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Measuring Neurotransmitter Release with Positron Emission Tomography. , 1998, NeuroImage.

[5]  Abraham Z. Snyder,et al.  CHAPTER 26 – Difference Image vs Ratio Image Error Function Forms in PET—PET Realignment , 1996 .

[6]  J. Anderson A rapid and accurate method to realign PET scans utilizing image edge information. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  Alain Venot,et al.  A new class of similarity measures for robust image registration , 1984, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[8]  David J. Schlyer,et al.  Graphical Analysis of Reversible Radioligand Binding from Time—Activity Measurements Applied to [N-11C-Methyl]-(−)-Cocaine PET Studies in Human Subjects , 1990, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[9]  I. Kanno,et al.  Automated interstudy image registration technique for SPECT and PET. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Rapid Automated Algorithm for Aligning and Reslicing PET Images , 1992, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[11]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of Dynamic Radioligand Displacement or “Activation” Studies , 1997, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[12]  T. Zeffiro,et al.  Head movement in normal subjects during simulated PET brain imaging with and without head restraint. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  M. Phelps,et al.  Automated iterative three-dimensional registration of positron emission tomography images. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  Michael Unser,et al.  Convolution-based interpolation for fast, high-quality rotation of images , 1995, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[15]  C. Bohm,et al.  Correction for Scattered Radiation in a Ring Detector Positron Camera by Integral Transformation of the Projections , 1983, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[16]  M E Phelps,et al.  Automated image registration for FDOPA PET studies. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[17]  John A. Nelder,et al.  A Simplex Method for Function Minimization , 1965, Comput. J..

[18]  E. Rota Kops,et al.  Performance characteristics of an eight-ring whole body PET scanner. , 1990, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[19]  Yasuyoshi Watanabe,et al.  Possible effects of tetrahydrobiopterin treatment in six children with autism ‐ clinical and positron emission tomography data: a pilot study , 1997, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[20]  Margaret E. Daube-Witherspoon,et al.  A head motion measurement system suitable for emission computed tomography , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  C S Patlak,et al.  Graphical Evaluation of Blood-to-Brain Transfer Constants from Multiple-Time Uptake Data , 1983, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[22]  W C Eckelman,et al.  Quantification of Amphetamine-Induced Changes in [11C]Raclopride Binding with Continuous Infusion , 1997, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.