Information access and homeowners insurance purchases

This paper examines how information access—proxied by three treatment variables: high speed internet connection at home, English speaking ability and difficulty getting out—affects homeowners insurance purchases. There are only a few studies on how information access to markets affects insurance purchases. To make causal estimates of the impact of access proxies on insurance purchases by consumers, we match treated (little access) to control groups (more access) using several alternative algorithms (propensity scores, Euclidean matching and singular value decomposition (SVD) matching). Access, as proxied by fast internet connection and ability to get out, increases the amount spent on homeowners multi-peril insurance, while English speaking ability has no impact in the U.S. We find that while all the matching algorithms in our U.S. sample from the American Community Survey generally provide the same quantitative estimates, SVD matching appears to match surprisingly well on ‘out of sample’ variables.

[1]  Austan Goolsbee,et al.  Does the Internet Make Markets More Competitive? Evidence from the Life Insurance Industry , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.

[2]  Hope Jensen Schau,et al.  The healthcare network economy: The role of Internet information transfer and implications for pricing , 2005 .

[3]  James R. Garven,et al.  On the Implications of the Internet for Insurance Markets and Institutions , 2002 .

[4]  Petra E. Todd,et al.  Matching As An Econometric Evaluation Estimator , 1998 .

[5]  Fredric Blavin,et al.  The effects of language and geography-defined groups on health insurance choice , 2011 .

[6]  J. Walsh Shyness and social phobia: a social work perspective on a problem in living. , 2002, Health & social work.

[7]  C. Landry,et al.  Participation in the National Flood Insurance Program: An Empirical Analysis for Coastal Properties , 2004 .

[8]  A. Meyers,et al.  Disability as a public health issue: findings and reflections from the Massachusetts survey of secondary conditions. , 2002, The Milbank quarterly.

[9]  Mohammad R. Jahan-Parvar,et al.  Flood Insurance Coverage in the Coastal Zone , 2008 .

[10]  G. Brighetti,et al.  Do Emotions Affect Insurance Demand , 2014 .

[11]  J. Mossin Aspects of Rational Insurance Purchasing , 1968, Journal of Political Economy.

[12]  Satish Kumar An Empirical Examination of Risk Premiums in the Indian Currency Futures Market , 2017 .

[13]  N. Harvey,et al.  Behavioural finance: the role of psychological factors in financial decisions , 2012 .

[14]  Laura L. Pingol,et al.  Information Source Usage and Purchase Satisfaction: Implications for Product-Focused Print Media , 2005, Journal of Advertising Research.

[15]  Susan K. Laury,et al.  The Impact of Insurance Prices on Decision-Making Biases: An Experimental Analysis , 2002 .

[16]  R. Hoyt,et al.  The Demand for Automobile Insurance: Evidence from Underserved Areas in California , 2012 .

[17]  M. Browne,et al.  The Demand for Flood Insurance: Empirical Evidence , 1999 .

[18]  Butler Richard,et al.  The Simplest Non-Expected Utility Model for Lottery and Portfolio Choices , 2018 .

[19]  C. Kousky,et al.  Come Rain or Shine: Evidence on Flood Insurance Purchases in Florida , 2010 .