Reducing the radiation dose for low-dose CT of the paranasal sinuses using iterative reconstruction: feasibility and image quality.

PURPOSE To evaluate image quality of dose-reduced CT of the paranasal-sinus using an iterative reconstruction technique. METHODS In this study 80 patients (mean age: 46.9±18 years) underwent CT of the paranasalsinus (Siemens Definition, Forchheim, Germany), with either standard settings (A: 120 kV, 60 mAs) reconstructed with conventional filtered back projection (FBP) or with tube current-time product lowering of 20%, 40% and 60% (B: 48 mAs, C: 36 mAs and D: 24 mAs) using iterative reconstruction (n=20 each). Subjective image quality was independently assessed by four blinded observers using a semiquantitative five-point grading scale (1=poor, 5=excellent). Effective dose was calculated from the dose-length product. Mann-Whitney-U-test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS Mean effective dose was 0.28±0.03 mSv(A), 0.23±0.02 mSv(B), 0.17±0.02 mSv(C) and 0.11±0.01 mSv(D) resulting in a maximum dose reduction of 60% with iterative reconstruction technique as compared to the standard low-dose CT. Best image quality was observed at 48 mAs (mean 4.8; p<0.05), whereas standard low-dose CT (A) and maximum dose reduced scans (D) showed no significant difference in subjective image quality (mean 4.37 (A) and 4.31 (B); p=0.72). Interobserver agreement was excellent (κ values 0.79-0.93). CONCLUSION As compared to filtered back projection, the iterative reconstruction technique allows for significant dose reduction of up to 60% for paranasal-sinus CT without impairing the diagnostic image quality.

[1]  M. Mack,et al.  Chronische Infektionen der Nasennebenhöhlen , 2000, Der Radiologe.

[2]  R. Reznek,et al.  The effect of decreasing mAs on image quality and patient dose in sinus CT. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  K. Zou,et al.  Multidetector CT of the paranasal sinus: potential for radiation dose reduction. , 2007, Radiology.

[4]  E. Wiesen,et al.  Paranasal sinuses: low-dose CT. , 1991, Radiology.

[5]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Iterative reconstruction in image space (IRIS) in cardiac computed tomography: initial experience , 2011, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[6]  Jean-Baptiste Thibault,et al.  A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. , 2007, Medical physics.

[7]  F. Dammann,et al.  Bildgebung der Nasennebenhöhlen (NNH) in der heutigen Zeit , 2007, Der Radiologe.

[8]  Patrik Rogalla,et al.  Low-dose CT of the paranasal sinuses with eye lens protection: effect on image quality and radiation dose , 2002, European Radiology.

[9]  J. Remy,et al.  Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 1): evaluation of image noise reduction in 32 patients , 2011, European Radiology.

[10]  J. Remy,et al.  Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 2): image quality of low-dose CT examinations in 80 patients , 2011, European Radiology.

[11]  Pernilla Sahlstrand-Johnson,et al.  Low-dose computed tomography of the paranasal sinuses: radiation doses and reliability analysis. , 2011, American journal of otolaryngology.

[12]  William Pavlicek,et al.  Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  P. White,et al.  Computerized tomography mini-series: an alternative to standard paranasal sinus radiographs. , 1990, The Australian and New Zealand journal of surgery.