Issues for the selection of wheelchair-specific activity and participation outcome measures: a review.

OBJECTIVES To use the World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a framework to identify and to evaluate wheelchair-specific outcome instruments that are useful for measuring activity and participation. DATA SOURCES CINHAL, PsychInfo, EMBASE, Google Scholar, Dissertation Abstracts Medline databases, and conference proceedings. STUDY SELECTION Activity and participation measures that were specifically intended for adults who use wheelchairs and that were published in English in a peer-reviewed journal were included in this review. Based on electronic database searches using a variety of search terms, articles were identified by title, and appropriate abstracts were retrieved. Articles were obtained for all relevant abstracts. For peer-reviewed measures included in the review, we obtained any instruction manuals and related publications, frequently published in conference proceedings and theses or available electronically, on the development and testing of the measure. DATA EXTRACTION Tools included in the review were evaluated based on their conceptual coverage, reliability, validity, responsiveness, usefulness, and wheelchair contribution, which indicated how well the tool isolated the effect of the wheelchair on activity and participation outcomes. DATA SYNTHESIS A number of conceptual, psychometric, and applicability issues were identified with the 11 wheelchair-specific measures included in the review. A majority of the measures were mobility focused. No single tool received excellent ratings in all areas of the review. Some of the most frequent issues identified included a failure to account for differences attributable to different wheelchairs and wheelchair seating, limited psychometric testing, and high administrative and respondent burden. CONCLUSIONS Good reliability evidence was reported for most of the measures, but validity information was only available for 6 of the 11 measures, and responsiveness information for 3. This review suggests that these measures could be improved with further psychometric testing and with some modification to ensure that the contribution of the wheelchair to activity and participation outcomes is clearly identified.

[1]  Spencer E. Cahill,et al.  Reconsidering the Stigma of Physical Disability: Wheelchair Use and Public Kindness , 1995 .

[2]  J. Middleton,et al.  Five additional mobility and locomotor items to improve responsiveness of the FIM in wheelchair-dependent individuals with spinal cord injury , 2006, Spinal Cord.

[3]  William C Miller,et al.  Measuring wheelchair intervention outcomes: Development of the Wheelchair Outcome Measure , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[4]  Deirdre R. Dawson,et al.  Development of the Power-Mobility Indoor Driving Assessment for Residents of Long-Term Care Facilities: A Preliminary Report , 1994 .

[5]  Alicia M Koontz,et al.  Advances in Manual Wheelchair Technology , 2006 .

[6]  R. D. de Haan,et al.  Psychometric properties of the Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire. , 2001, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[7]  M. Post,et al.  Participation after Spinal Cord Injury: The Evolution of Conceptualization and Measurement , 2005, Journal of neurologic physical therapy : JNPT.

[8]  D. Streiner,et al.  Health Measurement Scales: A practical guide to thier development and use , 1989 .

[9]  M. Schuntermann.  The implementation of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health in Germany: experiences and problems , 2005, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[10]  Roger O. Smith,et al.  Assistive Technology in the Measurement of Rehabilitation and Health Outcomes: A Review and Analysis of Instruments , 2005, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[11]  Donald R. Miller,et al.  Barriers, facilitators, and access for wheelchair users: substantive and methodologic lessons from a pilot study of environmental effects. , 2002, Social science & medicine.

[12]  J. Desrosiers,et al.  Measuring social participation: reliability of the LIFE-H in older adults with disabilities , 2004, Disability and rehabilitation.

[13]  P. Croft,et al.  The Keele Assessment of Participation: A New Instrument to Measure Participation Restriction in Population Studies. Combined Qualitative and Quantitative Examination of its Psychometric Properties , 2005, Quality of Life Research.

[14]  T Mills,et al.  Development and consumer validation of the Functional Evaluation in a Wheelchair (FEW) instrument , 2002, Disability and rehabilitation.

[15]  L. May,et al.  Measurement reliability of functional tasks for persons who self-propel a manual wheelchair. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  M. Rodgers,et al.  Development of a functional assessment measure for manual wheelchair users. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[17]  J W Jutai,et al.  Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF Participation , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[18]  Frances Harris,et al.  Conceptual issues in the measurement of participation among wheeled mobility device users , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[19]  Tae-Gyung Kang,et al.  Mobility Device Use in the United States , 2003 .

[20]  R. L. Kirby,et al.  The Wheelchair Skills Test: a pilot study of a new outcome measure. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[21]  Richard F Edlich,et al.  Technological advances in powered wheelchairs. , 2004, Journal of long-term effects of medical implants.

[22]  M. Law,et al.  Measuring Occupational Performance: Supporting Best Practice in Occupational Therapy , 2001 .

[23]  D. Wade.  Assessment, measurement and data collection tools , 2004, Clinical rehabilitation.

[24]  R Lee Kirby,et al.  The wheelchair skills test, version 2.4: Validity of an algorithm-based questionnaire version. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[25]  Luc P De Witte,et al.  The Wheelchair Circuit: Construct validity and responsiveness of a test to assess manual wheelchair mobility in persons with spinal cord injury. , 2004, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

[26]  E. McAuley,et al.  The physical activity scale for individuals with physical disabilities: development and evaluation. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[27]  L. Harvey,et al.  Reliability of a tool for assessing mobility in wheelchair-dependent paraplegics , 1998, Spinal Cord.

[28]  N. Yoshiike,et al.  Validity, reliability and acceptability of the Japanese version of the General Well-Being Schedule (GWBS) , 2004, Quality of Life Research.

[29]  M. Oliver.  The Politics of Disablement: A Sociological Approach , 1990 .

[30]  Thomas Ewert,et al.  Linking health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health. , 2002, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[31]  Peter R. Giacobbi,et al.  Methodological challenges confronting researchers of wheeled mobility aids and other assistive technologies , 2007, Disability and rehabilitation. Assistive technology.

[32]  M J Buxton,et al.  Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. , 1998, Health technology assessment.

[33]  Kerri A Morgan,et al.  Participation survey/mobility: psychometric properties of a measure of participation for people with mobility impairments and limitations. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[34]  A J Moss,et al.  Assistive technology devices and home accessibility features: prevalence, payment, need, and trends. , 1992, Advance data.

[35]  R. Kaplan,et al.  Performance of a self-administered mailed version of the Quality of Well-Being (QWB-SA) questionnaire among older adults. , 1998, Medical care.

[36]  R. Marino,et al.  Assessing selfcare status in quadriplegia: comparison of the quadriplegia index of function (QIF) and the functional independence measure (FIM) , 1993, Paraplegia.

[37]  E. Andresen,et al.  Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[38]  Spencer E. Cahill,et al.  Managing emotions in public: the case of wheelchair users , 1994 .

[39]  Claude Vincent,et al.  Development of an obstacle course assessment of wheelchair user performance (OCAWUP): A content validity study , 2004 .

[40]  A. Jette,et al.  Validation of the Late‐Life Function and Disability Instrument , 2004, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[41]  M. Bergner,et al.  Health status measures: an overview and guide for selection. , 1987, Annual review of public health.

[42]  F. Guillemin,et al.  Feasibility, Acceptability and Internal Consistency Reliability of the Nottingham Health Profile in Dementia Patients , 2002, Gerontology.

[43]  A. Carr,et al.  Primary total hip replacement surgery: a systematic review of outcomes and modelling of cost-effectiveness associated with different prostheses. , 1998, Health technology assessment.

[44]  Serafino Buono,et al.  ICF- INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH , 2003 .

[45]  Sylvie Nadeau,et al.  Reliability and construct validity studies of an obstacle course assessment of wheelchair user performance , 2005, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[46]  Linda McClain,et al.  A Qualitative Assessment of Wheelchair Users' Experience with ADA Compliance, Physical Barriers, and Secondary Health Conditions , 2000 .

[47]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Construct validity in psychological tests. , 1955, Psychological bulletin.

[48]  M. Laplante,et al.  MOBILITY DEVICE USE IN THE UNITED STATES: DISABILITY STATISTICS REPORT , 2000 .

[49]  H. Hoenig,et al.  Activity Restriction Among Wheelchair Users , 2003, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[50]  Applicability of the Functional Reach and Timed Up and Go Tests for Elderly Individuals with Alzheimer's Disease , 2001 .

[51]  B. Swaine,et al.  Making sense of pragmatic criteria for the selection of geriatric rehabilitation measurement tools. , 2006, Archives of gerontology and geriatrics.

[52]  L. V. D. van der Woude,et al.  The wheelchair circuit: reliability of a test to assess mobility in persons with spinal cord injuries. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[53]  A. Jette,et al.  Are the ICF Activity and Participation dimensions distinct? , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[54]  A. Chorus,et al.  Measuring participation according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) , 2003, Disability and rehabilitation.

[55]  R. Fuchs,et al.  Wheelchair Use by Residents of Nursing Homes: Effectiveness in Meeting Positioning and Mobility Needs , 2003, Assistive technology : the official journal of RESNA.

[56]  M. E. Cress,et al.  Physical functional performance in persons using a manual wheelchair. , 2002, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[57]  D. Gladman,et al.  Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[58]  G. Whiteneck,et al.  Quantifying environmental factors: a measure of physical, attitudinal, service, productivity, and policy barriers. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[59]  Krista L Best,et al.  The wheelchair skills test (version 2.4): measurement properties. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[60]  E. Finch.  Physical rehabilitation outcome measures : a guide to enhanced clinical decision making , 2002 .

[61]  Mahoney Fi,et al.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX. , 1965 .

[62]  Helena Hemmingsson,et al.  An occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health--some critical remarks. , 2005, The American journal of occupational therapy : official publication of the American Occupational Therapy Association.