Systematic review of telemedicine applications in emergency rooms

CONTEXT Despite the frequency of use of telemedicine in emergency care, limited evidence exists on its impacts at the patient, provider, organization, and system level. Hospital-based applications of telemedicine present a potentially important solution, particularly for small and rural hospitals where access to local specialists is rarely available. PURPOSE We conducted a systematic review of telemedicine applications for hospital-based emergency care, which aims to synthesize the existing evidence on the impact of tele-emergency applications that could inform future efforts and research in this area. BASIC PROCEDURES A search of four databases (PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Cochrane) using a combination of telemedicine and emergency room (ER) keywords for publications yielded 340 citations. Four coders independently determined eligibility based on initial criteria and then extracted information on the 38 resulting articles based on four main categories: study setting, type of technology, research methods, and results. MAIN FINDINGS Of the 38 articles, 11 studies focused on telemedicine for diffuse patient populations that typically present in ERs, 8 studies considered telemedicine in the context of minor treatment clinics for patients presenting with minor injuries or illnesses, and 19 studies focused on the use of telemedicine to connect providers in ERs to medical specialists for consultations on patients with specific conditions. Overwhelmingly, tele-emergency studies reported positive findings especially in terms of technical quality and user satisfaction. There were also positive findings reported for clinical processes and outcomes, throughput, and disposition, but the rigor of studies using these measures was limited. Studies of economic outcomes are particularly sparse. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS Despite limitations in their research methodology, the studies on tele-emergency indicate an application with promise to meet the needs of small and rural hospitals to address infrequent but emergency situations requiring specialist care. Similarly, studies indicate that tele-emergency has considerable potential to expand use of minor treatment clinics to address access issues in remote areas and overcrowding of urban ERs.

[1]  Peter Cram,et al.  Staff acceptance of tele-ICU coverage: a systematic review. , 2011, Chest.

[2]  Guy Paré,et al.  Review Paper: Systematic Review of Home Telemonitoring for Chronic Diseases: The Evidence Base , 2007, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[3]  Josipa Kern,et al.  Evaluation of teleconsultation systems , 2006, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[4]  Scholz Ja What is telemedicine , 1999 .

[5]  Shelley Stingley,et al.  Helmsley trust support for telehealth improves access to care in rural and frontier areas. , 2014, Health affairs.

[6]  E. Krupinski,et al.  The taxonomy of telemedicine. , 2011, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[7]  Alison Bowes,et al.  Methodologies for assessing telemedicine: A systematic review of reviews , 2012, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[8]  Keith Mueller,et al.  Extent of telehealth use in rural and urban hospitals. , 2014, Rural policy brief.

[9]  Zia Agha,et al.  Pulmonary telemedicine - A model to access the subspecialist services in underserved rural areas , 2009, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[10]  Ain Aaviksoo,et al.  Telemedicine across borders: A systematic review of factors that hinder or support implementation , 2012, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[11]  Sisira Edirippulige,et al.  Telemedicine - A bibliometric and content analysis of 17, 932 publication records , 2014, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[12]  Guy Paré,et al.  Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews , 2015, Inf. Manag..

[13]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2010, International journal of surgery.

[14]  M. Jaana,et al.  Home telemonitoring for respiratory conditions: a systematic review. , 2009, The American journal of managed care.

[15]  R. Bashshur,et al.  Telemedicine: a new health care delivery system. , 2000, Annual review of public health.

[16]  R. Elford Telemedicine: A Guide to Assessing Telecommunications in Health Care , 1997 .

[17]  J. Kvedar,et al.  Clinical outcomes associated with telemedicine/telehealth. , 2005, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[18]  Guy Paré,et al.  Hypertension Home Telemonitoring , 2007 .

[19]  Arthur L. Kellermann,et al.  Emergency care: then, now, and next. , 2013, Health affairs.

[20]  Lance Brendan Young,et al.  Impact of telemedicine intensive care unit coverage on patient outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2011, Archives of internal medicine.

[21]  M. Jaana,et al.  Home telemonitoring of patients with diabetes: a systematic assessment of observed effects. , 2007, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[22]  Alison Bowes,et al.  Effectiveness of telemedicine: A systematic review of reviews , 2010, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[23]  Nigel H. Lovell,et al.  Information technology in primary health care , 1999, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[24]  B. Tulu,et al.  Telemedicine taxonomy: a classification tool. , 2007, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.

[25]  Eli Perencevich,et al.  The costs of critical care telemedicine programs: a systematic review and analysis. , 2013, Chest.

[26]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[27]  V. Mbarika,et al.  What is telemedicine? A collection of 104 peer-reviewed perspectives and theoretical underpinnings. , 2007, Telemedicine journal and e-health : the official journal of the American Telemedicine Association.