Computerisation of endoscopy reports using standard reports and text blocks.

BACKGROUND The widespread use of gastrointestinal endoscopy for diagnosis and treatment requires effective, standardised report systems. This need is further increased by the limited storage of images, and by the need for structured databases for surveillance and epidemiology. We therefore aimed for a report system which would be quick, easy to learn, and suitable for use in busy daily practice. METHODS Endobase III is an endoscopy information system offering three different ways of report writing, i.e. standard reports, text blocks and Minimal Standard Terminology (MST). A working group of two university and four general hospitals worked as a reference group for the development of standard reports and text blocks. Guidelines from various gastrointestinal endoscopy societies were followed to compose the reports. RESULTS Standard reports were based on a list of distinct diagnoses; text blocks were based on anatomic landmarks and individual procedures. As such, 316 standard reports were developed for upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy, and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). In this way selecting one diagnosis produces a complete report. A total of 1571 different text blocks were additionally developed for each part of the gastrointestinal tract and for procedures during endoscopy. This module allowed generation of a full report on the combination of text blocks. Reports could be composed and printed within two minutes for 90% of cases. CONCLUSION Standard reports and text blocks are a quick, user-friendly way of report writing accepted and used by a number of gastroenterologists in the Netherlands.

[1]  A Gouveia-Oliveira,et al.  A Unified Approach to the Design of Clinical Reporting Systems , 1994, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[2]  C. Venables,et al.  Minimal standards for a computerized endoscopic database. Ad hoc Task Force of the Committee for Minimal Standards of Digestive Endoscopy of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). , 1994, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[3]  Judith R. Logan,et al.  The use of a standardized terminology for comparison of free text and structured data entry , 2000, AMIA.

[4]  L. Aabakken,et al.  The SADE system: an endoscopic database manager. , 1991, Endoscopy.

[5]  A Gouveia-Oliveira,et al.  SISCOPE: a multiuser information system for gastrointestinal endoscopy. , 1991, Endoscopy.

[6]  N. Finlayson,et al.  Endoscopy in gastrointestinal bleeding. , 1974, Lancet.

[7]  A. Mahmoud,et al.  Open-Access Endoscopy: Are Age-Based Guidelines Justified? An Audit of Experience of 1000 Open-Access Endoscopies at a District General Hospital , 2003, Endoscopy.

[8]  A. Blum,et al.  Endoscopic assessment of oesophagitis: clinical and functional correlates and further validation of the Los Angeles classification , 1999, Gut.

[9]  F M Zwiebel,et al.  The minimal standard terminology for digestive endoscopy: introduction to structured reporting. , 1998, International journal of medical informatics.

[10]  W. Swobodnik,et al.  Electronic Data Base in Gastroenterological Endoscopy , 1991, Endoscopy.

[11]  L. Korman Standardization in endoscopic reporting: implications for clinical practice and research. , 1999, Journal of clinical gastroenterology.

[12]  M. Sivak,et al.  More on endoscopy databases. , 2000, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[13]  C. Venables,et al.  Working Party Report by the Committee for Minimal Standards of Terminology and Documentation in Digestive Endoscopy of the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Minimal standard terminology for a computerized endoscopic database. Ad hoc Task Force of the Committee. , 1996, The American journal of gastroenterology.

[14]  P. Ballerini,et al.  Micro-ordinateur et fichier de protocoles d’endoscopie: coût et bénéfice ďun système de base de données , 1985, Acta Endoscopica.