An Example of a Pitfall in Aerodynamic Shape Optimization

The Applied Aerodynamics Technical Committee of AIAA launched an optimization discussion group, the Aerodynamic Design Optimization Discussion Group, in 2013. One of the four benchmark test cases is based on the NACA 0012 airfoil and solutions of the Euler equations with prescribed objective function and geometric constaints. Volunteer participants were invited by ONERA–The French Aerospace Lab to submit their optimized shapes for uniform pressure drag assessment through grid convergence. The assessment required three phases. Initial investigations with a simple protocol proved insufficient and raised some questions. This led to further investigations, which showed that, for most optimized airfoils, there exists a lower drag branch and a higher drag branch in the drag (Mach number) diagram. Hysteresis was observed when performing a downward Mach number sweep and an upward Mach number sweep. For several airfoils, the design Mach number falls within the overlap range of the two branches, which indicates tha...

[1]  A. Jameson,et al.  Numerical solution of the Euler equations by finite volume methods using Runge Kutta time stepping schemes , 1981 .

[2]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Airfoils admitting non-unique solutions of the Euler equations , 1991 .

[3]  The structural instability of transonic flow associated with amalgamation/splitting of supersonic regions , 2004 .

[4]  Michael A. Saunders,et al.  SNOPT: An SQP Algorithm for Large-Scale Constrained Optimization , 2005, SIAM Rev..

[5]  Laurent Cambier,et al.  Status of the elsA CFD Software for Flow Simulation and Multidisciplinary Applications , 2008 .

[6]  John C. Vassberg,et al.  In Pursuit of Grid Convergence for Two-Dimensional Euler Solutions , 2009 .

[7]  Jason E. Hicken,et al.  Aerodynamic Optimization Algorithm with Integrated Geometry Parameterization and Mesh Movement , 2010 .

[8]  A. Harrison,et al.  A Systematic Study on the Impact of Dimensionality for a Two-Dimensional Aerodynamic Optimization Model Problem , 2011 .

[9]  John C. Vassberg,et al.  Further Studies of Airfoils Supporting Non-Unique Solutions in Transonic Flow , 2011 .

[10]  Laurent Cambier,et al.  The Onera elsA CFD software: input from research and feedback from industry , 2013 .

[11]  David W. Zingg,et al.  Application of Jetstream to a Suite of Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Problems , 2014 .

[12]  Jacques Peter,et al.  Gradient-Based Aerodynamic Optimization with the elsA Software , 2014 .

[13]  Studies of Wings Supporting Non-unique Solutions in Transonic Flows , 2014 .

[14]  John C. Vassberg,et al.  Airfoils Supporting Non-unique Transonic Solutions for Unsteady Viscous Flows , 2014 .

[15]  Hugo Gagnon,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization of Benchmark Problems Using Jetstream , 2015 .

[16]  S. Nadarajah.  Adjoint-Based Aerodynamic Optimization of Benchmark Problems , 2015 .

[17]  John C. Vassberg,et al.  Gradient-Based Single and Multi-points Aerodynamic Optimizations with the elsA Software , 2015 .

[18]  D. P. Young,et al.  Study Based on the AIAA Aerodynamic Design Optimization Discussion Group Test Cases , 2015 .

[19]  Michael J. Aftosmis,et al.  Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Benchmarks with Error Control and Automatic Parameterization , 2015 .

[20]  Daniel J Poole,et al.  Control Point-Based Aerodynamic Shape Optimization Applied to AIAA ADODG Test Cases , 2015 .