Communication Structures in Partially Distributed Teams: The Importance of Inclusiveness

A partially distributed team (PDT) consists of two or more subteams that are separated geographically. In a PDT, members of a given subteam are co-located, but they collaborate with members of geographically distant subteams. PDTs are commonplace across diverse IT settings, including outsourcing, off-shoring, and distributed organizations. Often the distance separating subteams spans multiple time zones that encompass diverse cultures and countries, as in the case of global software development teams. Findings are presented from a large-scale international PDT project involving IT students from 13 universities. Quantitative analysis of three emergent communication structures adopted by PDTs show significant differences in terms of both procedural (i.e., awareness and coordination) and socio-emotional (i.e., shared identity and trust) team interaction variables as well as perceptions of team performance. Furthermore, a qualitative analysis shows that inclusive leadership behaviors and the use of inclusive media and software positively impact team interaction processes and performance.

[1]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[2]  S. Weisband.  Maintaining Awareness in Distributed Team Collaboration: Implications for Leadership and Performance , 2002 .

[3]  Rosalie J. Ocker,et al.  Preliminary insights into the in-group/out-group effect in partially distributed teams: an analysis of participant reflections , 2006, SIGMIS CPR '06.

[4]  Leslie P. Willcocks,et al.  Social Ties in Globally Distributed Software Teams: Beyond Face-to-Face Meetings , 2007 .

[5]  M. Maznevski,et al.  Bridging Space Over Time: Global Virtual Team Dynamics and Effectiveness , 2000 .

[6]  Suprateek Sarker,et al.  Information systems development by US-Norwegian virtual teams: implications of time and space , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[7]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  The interdisciplinary study of coordination , 1994, CSUR.

[8]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Trust in virtual teams: towards an integrative model of trust formation , 2004, 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the.

[9]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[10]  J HindsPamela,et al.  Understanding Conflict in Geographically Distributed Teams , 2005 .

[11]  Sumita Raghuram,et al.  Organizational identification among virtual workers: the role of need for affiliation and perceived work-based social support , 2001 .

[12]  Raymond E. Levitt,et al.  Interpersonal trust in cross-functional, geographically distributed work: A longitudinal study , 2004, Inf. Organ..

[13]  C. Cramton.  The Mutual Knowledge Problem and Its Consequences for Dispersed Collaboration , 2001 .

[14]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  The Organizational Trust Inventory (OTI): Development and validation. , 1996 .

[15]  HiltzStarr Roxanne,et al.  The effects of distributed group support and process structuring on software requirements development teams , 1995 .

[16]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Leadership of information systems development projects , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[17]  Blake Ives,et al.  Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research , 2004, DATB.

[18]  Pamela Abbott,et al.  Why 'nearshore' means that distance matters , 2007, CACM.

[19]  L. Hosmer.  TRUST: THE CONNECTING LINK BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL THEORY AND PHILOSOPHICAL ETHICS , 1995 .

[20]  James D. Herbsleb,et al.  Splitting the organization and integrating the code: Conway's law revisited , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 International Conference on Software Engineering (IEEE Cat. No.99CB37002).

[21]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Managing Distances and Differences in Geographically Distributed Work Groups , 2002 .

[22]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Awareness and coordination in shared workspaces , 1992, CSCW '92.

[23]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  Because Time Matters: Temporal Coordination in Global Virtual Project Teams , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[25]  G. Northcraft,et al.  You have printed the following article : Why Differences Make a Difference : A Field Study of Diversity , Conflict , and Performance in Workgroups , 2007 .

[26]  Timothy R. Kayworth,et al.  The global virtual manager: a prescription for success , 2000 .

[27]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Enhancing Learning Experiences in Partially Distributed Teams: Training Students to Work Effectively Across Distances , 2009 .