E pluribus, plurima: the synergy of interdisciplinary class groups

Computer science is increasingly becoming interdisciplinary, with applications not only in scientific disciplines, but also in the arts, humanities, and social sciences. Training computer scientists to work in diverse application disciplines is imperative for modern departments. We have had success using interdisciplinary groups for this purpose in a computational biology class, Algorithms for Molecular Biology. In this class, carefully-balanced interdisciplinary groups learn to take advantage of each other's abilities, and to communicate effectively with students with a much different background. From this diversity, we get much more (e pluribus, plurima) than would be possible if we tried to train all students to have a more homogeneous blend of multiple disciplinary knowledge. Within a single semester, students go from virtually no understanding of one discipline to completing research projects on a relevant problem that they have defined themselves.

[1]  Janine Davidson,et al.  Genius Denied: How to Stop Wasting Our Brightest Young Minds , 2004 .

[2]  R. Felder,et al.  Navigating the Bumpy Road to Student-Centered Instruction , 1996 .

[3]  Stephanie G. Adams,et al.  Building Successful Student Teams in the Engineering Classroom , 2004 .

[4]  Judy Kay,et al.  Student satisfaction with groupwork in undergraduate computer science : do things get better? , 2003, ACE.

[5]  John M. Parente,et al.  Collaborative Learning vs. Lecture/Discussion: Students' Reported Learning Gains * , 2001 .

[6]  Rebecca Brent,et al.  Designing and Teaching Courses to Satisfy the ABET Engineering Criteria , 2003 .

[7]  Amer Diwan,et al.  Student culture vs group work in computer science , 2004, SIGCSE '04.

[8]  Amer Diwan,et al.  An infrastructure for teaching skills for group decision making and problem solving in programming projects , 2002, SIGCSE '02.

[9]  Stephen Farrow,et al.  Group Learning and Group Assessment on Undergraduate Computing Courses in Higher Education in the UK: results of a survey , 1997 .

[10]  Sue V. Rosser,et al.  Group Work in Science, Engineering, and Mathematics: Consequences of Ignoring Gender and Race , 1998 .

[11]  Leonard Springer,et al.  Effects of Small-Group Learning on Undergraduates in Science, Mathematics, Engineering, and Technology: A Meta-Analysis , 1997 .

[12]  S. Rimm Why Bright Kids Get Poor Grades: And What You Can Do About It , 1995 .

[13]  S. Assouline,et al.  A Nation Deceived: How Schools Hold Back America's Brightest Students. The Templeton National Report on Acceleration. Volume 2. , 2004 .

[14]  Charles K. Fadel,et al.  21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times , 2009 .

[15]  Patrick S. W. Fong,et al.  Building Teams That Learn: Study of Learning Effects in Engineering Student Teams , 2010 .

[16]  P. Ross,et al.  National Excellence: A Case for Developing America's Talent. An Anthology of Readings. , 1994 .

[17]  K. Rogers Using Current Research To Make "Good" Decisions About Grouping , 1998 .