The role of left and right hemispheres in the comprehension of idiomatic language: an electrical neuroimaging study

BackgroundThe specific role of the two cerebral hemispheres in processing idiomatic language is highly debated. While some studies show the involvement of the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG), other data support the crucial role of right-hemispheric regions, and particularly of the middle/superior temporal area. Time-course and neural bases of literal vs. idiomatic language processing were compared. Fifteen volunteers silently read 360 idiomatic and literal Italian sentences and decided whether they were semantically related or unrelated to a following target word, while their EEGs were recorded from 128 electrodes. Word length, abstractness and frequency of use, sentence comprehensibility, familiarity and cloze probability were matched across classes.ResultsParticipants responded more quickly to literal than to idiomatic sentences, probably indicating a difference in task difficulty. Occipito/temporal N2 component had a greater amplitude in response to idioms between 250-300 ms. Related swLORETA source reconstruction revealed a difference in the activation of the left fusiform gyrus (FG, BA19) and medial frontal gyri for the contrast idiomatic-minus-literal. Centroparietal N400 was much larger to idiomatic than to literal phrases (360-550 ms). The intra-cortical generators of this effect included the left and right FG, the left cingulate gyrus, the right limbic area, the right MTG (BA21) and the left middle frontal gyrus (BA46). Finally, an anterior late positivity (600-800 ms) was larger to idiomatic than literal phrases. ERPs also showed a larger right centro-parietal N400 to associated than non-associated targets (not differing as a function of sentence type), and a greater right frontal P600 to idiomatic than literal associated targets.ConclusionThe data indicate bilateral involvement of both hemispheres in idiom comprehension, including the right MTG after 350 ms and the right medial frontal gyrus in the time windows 270-300 and 500-780 ms. In addition, the activation of left and right limbic regions (400-450 ms) suggests that they have a role in the emotional connotation of colourful idiomatic language. The data support the view that there is direct access to the idiomatic meaning of figurative language, not dependent on the suppression of its literal meaning, for which the LIFG was previously thought to be responsible.

[1]  P. Tabossi,et al.  Spoken Idiom Recognition: Meaning Retrieval and Word Expectancy , 2005, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[2]  Michael J. Brammer,et al.  How metaphors influence semantic relatedness judgments: The role of the right frontal cortex , 2006, NeuroImage.

[3]  T. Hendler,et al.  Hemispheric differences in processing the literal interpretation of idioms: Converging evidence from behavioral and fMRI studies , 2008, Cortex.

[4]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language. A positron emission tomography activation study. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[5]  H. Gardner,et al.  Connotative judgements by aphasic patients on a pictorial adaptation of the semantic differential. , 1973, Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior.

[6]  Peter A Tass,et al.  swLORETA: a novel approach to robust source localization and synchronization tomography , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  C. Petten,et al.  A special role for the right hemisphere in metaphor comprehension? ERP evidence from hemifield presentation , 2007, Brain Research.

[8]  H. Critchley,et al.  Neural correlates of processing valence and arousal in affective words. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[9]  Abraham Goldstein,et al.  Dynamics of hemispheric activity during metaphor comprehension: Electrophysiological measures , 2007, NeuroImage.

[10]  S. Cappa,et al.  Idiom comprehension: a prefrontal task? , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[11]  Stephen R. Anderson,et al.  A Festschrift for Morris Halle , 1973 .

[12]  C. Miniussi,et al.  The time course of idiom processing , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  Jared M. Novick,et al.  Putting lexical constraints in context into the visual-world paradigm , 2008, Cognition.

[14]  N. Dronkers,et al.  Lesion analysis of the brain areas involved in language comprehension , 2004, Cognition.

[15]  Christine Passerieux,et al.  On understanding idiomatic language: The salience hypothesis assessed by ERPs , 2006, Brain Research.

[16]  Costanza Papagno,et al.  Left But Not Right Temporal Involvement in Opaque Idiom Comprehension: A Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  M. Pell,et al.  Effects of verbal working memory deficits on metaphor comprehension in patients with Parkinson’s disease , 2007, Brain and Language.

[18]  D. Schacter,et al.  Processing emotional pictures and words: Effects of valence and arousal , 2006, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[19]  David Poeppel,et al.  Towards a new functional anatomy of language , 2004, Cognition.

[20]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Language-related field potentials in the anterior-medial temporal lobe: I. Intracranial distribution and neural generators , 1995, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[21]  Sam Glucksberg,et al.  Older Adults Filter Irrelevant Information During Metaphor Comprehension , 2002, Experimental aging research.

[22]  Michal Lavidor,et al.  The Role of the Right Cerebral Hemisphere in Processing Novel Metaphoric Expressions: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  H. Gardner,et al.  The comprehension of metaphor in brain-damaged patients. , 1977, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  J. Pynte,et al.  The Time-Course of Metaphor Comprehension: An Event-Related Potential Study , 1996, Brain and Language.

[25]  R. Adorni,et al.  The left fusiform area is affected by written frequency of words , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  Lars Kuchinke,et al.  Incidental effects of emotional valence in single word processing: An fMRI study , 2005, NeuroImage.

[27]  Costanza Papagno,et al.  Is the right hemisphere involved in idiom comprehension? A neuropsychological study. , 2006, Neuropsychology.

[28]  C. Tompkins Knowledge and strategies for processing lexical metaphor after right or left hemisphere brain damage. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[29]  S Lehéricy,et al.  The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[30]  Joseph T Devlin,et al.  The pro and cons of labelling a left occipitotemporal region: “the visual word form area” , 2004, NeuroImage.

[31]  Anna M. Thornton,et al.  Corpus e Lessico di frequenza dell’Italiano Scritto (CoLFIS). , 2005 .

[32]  Asa Kasher,et al.  Differential Effects of Right- and Left-Hemisphere Damage on Understanding Sarcasm and Metaphor , 2000 .

[33]  R. Gibbs The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought , 2008 .

[34]  M. Faust,et al.  Understanding metaphoric sentences in the two cerebral hemispheres. , 2000, Brain and cognition.

[35]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Specialization within the ventral stream: the case for the visual word form area , 2004, NeuroImage.

[37]  T. Allison,et al.  Word recognition in the human inferior temporal lobe , 1994, Nature.

[38]  J. Hinojosa,et al.  Neural activity associated with metaphor comprehension: spatial analysis , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[39]  Seana Coulson,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought: Metaphor comprehension and the brain , 2008 .

[40]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  The Role of Suppression and Enhancement in Understanding Metaphors. , 2001, Journal of memory and language.

[41]  Remco J. Renken,et al.  Evidence for bilateral involvement in idiom comprehension: An fMRI study , 2007, NeuroImage.

[42]  D. Lancker,et al.  Comprehension of familiar phrases by left- but not by right-hemisphere damaged patients , 1987, Brain and Language.

[43]  J. Trueswell,et al.  Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of Broca’s area in sentence comprehension , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.