Влияние различных доз бусульфана в режимах кондиционирования на исход аллогенной трансплантации гемопоэтических стволовых клеток у детей с острым миелобластным лейкозом

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a potentially curative therapy for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The conditioning regimen administered for this patient based on busulfan (Bu) combined with cyclophosphamide (Cy), fludarabine (Flu) or some other agents. Comparisons of myeloablative conditioning (MAC) versus reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) have demonstrated a various results between relapse and toxicity in a few reports. We suppose, that dose intensity of Bu across regimens may affect treatment outcomes. Aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the impact dose of busulfan to overall survival (OS), transplant-related mortality (TRM), relapse-free survival (RFS), toxicity, the incidence of primary graft failure and acute "graft versus host" disease (GvHD) in transplantation in children and adolescents with AML. The study was approved by the Independent Ethics Committee and the Scientific Council of the I.P. Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University. We analyzed 110 AML pediatric patients with the median age 9 (range 1–19) y.o., who underwent first allo-HSCT with Bu based conditioning in R.M. Gorbacheva Memorial Institute from 2002 to 2018. Patients were divided into 3 groups: Bu1 – patients, who received Bu at the dose 8–10 mg/kg, n = 34 (31%), in Bu2 – dose of Bu was 12 mg/kg, n = 35 (32%), in Bu3 – dose of Bu was > 12 mg/kg, n = 41 (37%). In Bu1 Bu was combined with Flu in 31 (91%) pts and Cy in 3 (9%); in Bu2 – with Flu in 12 (34%), Cy in 7 (20%) and other agents in 16 (46%); in Bu3 – with Cy in 32 (78%), with Flu in 7 (17%) and other agents in 2 pts (5%) (p < 0.001). Patients in Bu2 received more Cy based GvHD prophylaxis regimens (69% vs 44% in Bu1, vs 29% in Bu3, p = 0.003) and more haplo grafts (51% vs 29% in Bu1, vs 15% in Bu3, p = 0.003). The complete remission at the HSCT was observed in 79 % in Bu1, 49% in Bu2, 61% in Bu3 (p = 0.02). Probabilities of OS, RFS, TRM were estimated by using the Kaplan–Meier method. Incidence of toxicity, acute GvHD and primary graft failure – by using Mann–Whitney U-test. Transplant engraftment was achieved in 95 (86%) of patients. Graft failure occurs in the 5 patients of Bu1 group (15%), in the 6 pts of Bu2 (17%) and in the 4 pts of Bu3 (10%) (p = 0.7). Median follow-up was 2 years for Bu1 and Bu3, 1 year for Bu2. Two-year OS was similar (Bu1 = 59% vs Bu2 = 60% vs Bu3 51%, p = 0.7). Two-year OS of pts with CR before HSCT was 70% in Bu1, 82% in Bu2, 60% in Bu3, p = 0,3 and 14%, 39%, 38% for pts with progression disease (PD), respectively (p = 0.5). Two-year RFS was 74% in Bu1, 82% in Bu2, 64% in Bu3 at CR (p = 0.4); 43%, 39% and 38% in pts with progression, respectively (p = 0.9). Median of RFS were also similar for the pts in PD (4 months in Bu1, 5 months in Bu2 and Bu3, p = 0.9) and not achieved for pts at CR. Drug related toxicity grade III–IV 4 experienced in 35% pts in Bu1, 29% in Bu2, in 54% in Bu3 (p = 0.04). Mucositis and toxic hepatitis were the most common adverse events. Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) experienced in 8 pts from different group: 4 from Bu2 (11%), 3 from Bu3 (7%) and only pts from Bu1 (3%) with previously treated of inotuzumab (p = 0.4). The most pts with VOD (3/5) had PD at the HSCT. Cumulative incidence of acute GvHD grade 2 (15% vs 14% vs 10%, p = 0.8) were not different. Acute GvHD grade III–IV was observed a bit more often in Bu3 (34%), than in Bu1 (18%) and Bu2 (17%) (p = 0.09). TRM up to D+100 was also higher in Bu3 (15%), than in Bu2 (6%) and Bu1 (0%) (p = 0.05). The transplant results of children with similar disease status of AML, received MAC or RIC conditioning with various dose of Bu, were not associated with significant differences in overall outcomes. The higher dose Bu may increase incidence of toxicity grade III–IV (p = 0.04) and acute GvHD grade III–IV (p = 0.09) with increasing of early TRM (p = 0.05).

[1]  S. Mineishi,et al.  Comparison of pediatric allogeneic transplant outcomes using myeloablative busulfan with cyclophosphamide or fludarabine. , 2018, Blood advances.

[2]  S. Phipps,et al.  Cognitive outcome after pediatric stem-cell transplantation: impact of age and total-body irradiation. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  E. V. van Maarseveen,et al.  Fludarabine and exposure-targeted busulfan compares favorably with busulfan/cyclophosphamide-based regimens in pediatric hematopoietic cell transplantation: maintaining efficacy with less toxicity. , 2014, Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

[4]  P. Rohrlich,et al.  Impact on long-term OS of conditioning regimen in allogeneic BMT for children with AML in first CR: TBI+CY versus BU+CY: a report from the Société Française de Greffe de Moelle et de Thérapie Cellulaire , 2014, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[5]  M. Labopin,et al.  Allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in remission: comparison of intravenous busulfan plus cyclophosphamide (Cy) versus total-body irradiation plus Cy as conditioning regimen--a report from the acute leukemia working party of the European group for blood and , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  S. Tu,et al.  Busulfan plus fludarabine as a myeloablative conditioning regimen compared with busulfan plus cyclophosphamide for acute myeloid leukemia in first complete remission undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a prospective and multicenter study , 2013, Journal of Hematology & Oncology.

[7]  G. McDonald Hepatobiliary Complications of Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation, 40 Years On , 2010, Hepatology.

[8]  Xu Shi-xia,et al.  Total body irradiation plus cyclophosphamide versus busulphan with cyclophosphamide as conditioning regimen for patients with leukemia undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation: a meta-analysis , 2010, Leukemia & lymphoma.

[9]  T. Koyama,et al.  Impact of conditioning regimen in allogeneic hematopoetic stem cell transplantation for children with acute myelogenous leukemia beyond first complete remission: a pediatric blood and marrow transplant consortium (PBMTC) study. , 2009, Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

[10]  B. Sandmaier,et al.  Defining the intensity of conditioning regimens: working definitions. , 2009, Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

[11]  R. Hanada,et al.  Risk-stratified therapy and the intensive use of cytarabine improves the outcome in childhood acute myeloid leukemia: the AML99 trial from the Japanese Childhood AML Cooperative Study Group. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  C. Knibbe,et al.  Association between busulfan exposure and outcome in children receiving intravenous busulfan before hematologic stem cell transplantation. , 2009, Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

[13]  J. Cornelissen,et al.  Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in acute myeloid leukemia: a risk-adapted approach. , 2008, Blood reviews.

[14]  P. Thall,et al.  Once daily i.v. busulfan and fludarabine (i.v. Bu-Flu) compares favorably with i.v. busulfan and cyclophosphamide (i.v. BuCy2) as pretransplant conditioning therapy in AML/MDS. , 2008, Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

[15]  S. Feig,et al.  Outcomes in CCG-2961, a children's oncology group phase 3 trial for untreated pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: a report from the children's oncology group. , 2008, Blood.

[16]  Y. Chae,et al.  New myeloablative conditioning regimen with fludarabine and busulfan for allogeneic stem cell transplantation: comparison with BuCy2 , 2007, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[17]  A. Baruchel,et al.  Long-term outcomes after allogeneic stem cell transplantation for children with hematological malignancies , 2007, Bone Marrow Transplantation.

[18]  D. Reinhardt,et al.  Less toxicity by optimizing chemotherapy, but not by addition of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in children and adolescents with acute myeloid leukemia: results of AML-BFM 98. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  R. Hills,et al.  Treatment strategy and long-term results in paediatric patients treated in consecutive UK AML trials , 2005, Leukemia.

[20]  A. Tichelli,et al.  Nonmalignant late effects after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. , 2003, Blood.

[21]  B. Andersson,et al.  Once-daily intravenous busulfan given with fludarabine as conditioning for allogeneic stem cell transplantation: study of pharmacokinetics and early clinical outcomes. , 2002, Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

[22]  W. Plunkett,et al.  Cellular and Clinical Pharmacology of Fludarabine , 2002, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[23]  J. Gibbs,et al.  Plasma Concentration Monitoring of Busulfan , 2000 .

[24]  E. Jaffe,et al.  New malignant diseases after allogeneic marrow transplantation for childhood acute leukemia. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  G. Leverger,et al.  Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for children with acute myeloblastic leukemia in first complete remission: impact of conditioning regimen without total-body irradiation--a report from the Société Française de Greffe de Moelle. , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  S. Sencer,et al.  HEMORRHAGIC CYSTITIS AFTER BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION RISK FACTORS AND COMPLICATIONS , 1993, Transplantation.

[27]  K. Weinberg,et al.  Hepatic veno-occlusive disease post-bone marrow transplantation in children conditioned with busulfan and cyclophosphamide: incidence, risk factors, and clinical outcome. , 1991, Bone marrow transplantation.

[28]  J. Klein,et al.  Bone marrow transplantation for leukemia following a new busulfan and cyclophosphamide regimen , 1987 .