Distributed hypothesis testing with a fusion center: The conditionally dependent case

The paper deals with decentralized Bayesian detection with M hypotheses, and N sensors making conditionally correlated measurements regarding these hypotheses. Each sensor sends to a fusion center an integer from {0, 1, ..,D - 1}, and the fusion center makes a decision on the actual hypothesis based on the messages it receives from the sensors so as to minimize the average probability of error. Such conditionally dependent scenarios arise in several applications of decentralized detection such as sensor networks and network security. Conditional dependence leads to a non-standard distributed decision problem where threshold based policies (on likelihood ratios) are no longer optimal, which results in a challenging distributed optimization/decision making problem. We show that, in this case, the minimum average probability of error cannot be expressed as a function of the marginal distributions of the sensor messages. Instead, we characterize this probability based on the joint distributions of these messages. We also provide some numerical results for the case where the sensors¿ measurements follow bivariate normal distributions.

[1]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Extremal properties of likelihood-ratio quantizers , 1993, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[2]  D. Luenberger Optimization by Vector Space Methods , 1968 .

[3]  Tansu Alpcan,et al.  A Decentralized Bayesian Attack Detection Algorithm for Network Security , 2008, SEC.

[4]  Venugopal V. Veeravalli,et al.  Asymptotic results for decentralized detection in power constrained wireless sensor networks , 2004, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[5]  Rick S. Blum,et al.  The good, bad and ugly: distributed detection of a known signal in dependent Gaussian noise , 2000, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[6]  Nils Sandell,et al.  Detection with Distributed Sensors , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[7]  Pramod K. Varshney,et al.  Distributed Bayesian signal detection , 1989, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[8]  J. Tsitsiklis Decentralized Detection' , 1993 .

[9]  Venugopal V. Veeravalli,et al.  How Dense Should a Sensor Network Be for Detection With Correlated Observations? , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[10]  V. Veeravalli,et al.  Decentralized Detection with Correlated Observations , 2007, 2007 Conference Record of the Forty-First Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[11]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  An Introduction to Signal Detection and Estimation , 1994, Springer Texts in Electrical Engineering.

[12]  H. Vincent Poor,et al.  An introduction to signal detection and estimation (2nd ed.) , 1994 .

[13]  Firooz Sadjadi Hypotheses Testing in a Distributed Environment , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[14]  K. Khalil On the Complexity of Decentralized Decision Making and Detection Problems , 2022 .

[15]  T. Başar,et al.  Asymptotically optimal quantization for detection in power constrained decentralized sensor networks , 2006, 2006 American Control Conference.