Factors Affecting Nursing Students’ Readiness and Perceptions Toward the Use of Mobile Technologies for Learning

The purpose of this study was to determine the current usage of mobile devices, preferences of mobile learning environments and examine the readiness of nursing students in a public university. In order to investigate preferences and attitudes with respect to mobile technology use in nursing education, 387 students at a state university have been surveyed. It has been observed that while students preferred their current portable laptops, those in higher classes were more inclined to favor mobile phones. The common problems of battery life and high cost of communication, both in smartphones and tablet systems, suggest that hardware quality and financial constraints seem to be two main factors in determining these technologies. While more than half of students expressed readiness for mobile learning, one quarter indicated indecision. Through multivariate regression analysis, readiness to use mobile learning can be described in terms of perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, personal innovativeness, self-management of learning, perceived device limitation, and availability. Class level, perceived ease of use, personal innovativeness, and self-management of learning explain intention to use mobile learning. Findings obtained from these results can provide guidance in the development and application of mobile learning systems.

[1]  Robin E. Pattillo,et al.  Tracking Clinical Use of Personal Digital Assistant Reference Resources , 2007, Nurse educator.

[2]  G. Putzer,et al.  The effects of innovation factors on smartphone adoption among nurses in community hospitals. , 2010, Perspectives in health information management.

[3]  Issham Ismail,et al.  Technology Readiness Index (TRI) among USM Distance Education Students According to Age , 2010 .

[4]  L. Rose,et al.  Use of mobile handheld computers in clinical nursing education. , 2008, The Journal of nursing education.

[5]  Helen Colevins,et al.  Nurse Refresher Students Get a Hand from Handhelds. , 2006 .

[6]  Hyeongjik Lee,et al.  Conjoint Analysis for Mobile Devices for Ubiquitous Learning in Higher Education: The Korean Case , 2013 .

[7]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[8]  Su-Chao Chang,et al.  Nursing students' behavioral intention to use online courses: a questionnaire survey. , 2008, International journal of nursing studies.

[9]  R. Pattillo,et al.  PDAs in the Nursing Curriculum: Providing Data for Internal Funding , 2006, Nurse Educator.

[10]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  Christer Carlsson,et al.  Factors driving the adoption of m-learning: An empirical study , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[12]  Karen L. Murphy,et al.  Towards Identifying Factors Underlying Readiness for Online Learning: An Exploratory Study , 2003 .

[13]  Hassan Akour,et al.  Determinants of Mobile Learning Acceptance: An Empirical Investigation in Higher Education. , 2010 .

[14]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Investigating healthcare professionals' decisions to accept telemedicine technology: an empirical test of competing theories , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[15]  Zoraini Wati Abas,et al.  A Study On Learner Readiness For MobileLearning At Open University Malaysia , 2009 .

[16]  Cathy Johnson Nurses and the Use of Personal Digital Assistants (PDAs) at the Point of Care , 2008 .

[17]  I. Qureshi,et al.  M-learning adoption: A perspective from a developing country , 2012 .

[18]  Joseph Rene Corbeil,et al.  Are You Ready for Mobile Learning , 2007 .

[19]  Kennedy D. Gunawardana,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Factors that Impact Medical Representatives' Attitude toward the Intention to Use M-Learning for Career Development , 2009 .

[20]  Sang-goo Lee,et al.  MobileNurse: hand-held information system for point of nursing care , 2004, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[21]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[22]  K. Ibrahim,et al.  The degree of readiness of students of the University of Jordan to cope with future challenges entailed by the application of mobile learning in the educational field , 2012, Proceedings of 2012 International Conference on Interactive Mobile and Computer Aided Learning (IMCL).

[23]  S. Lapinsky,et al.  Review Paper: Handheld Computing in Medicine , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[24]  Richard F. Kenny,et al.  Using self-efficacy to assess the readiness of nursing educators and students for mobile learning , 2012 .

[25]  Laurie Bedford,et al.  Willingness and Preferences of Nurses Related to Learning With Technology , 2011, Journal for nurses in staff development : JNSD : official journal of the National Nursing Staff Development Organization.

[26]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  Investigating the determinants and age and gender differences in the acceptance of mobile learning , 2009, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[27]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: A Model Comparison Approach , 2001, Decis. Sci..

[28]  Stephen E. Lapinsky,et al.  Review Paper: Handheld Computing in Medicine , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[29]  T. Wyatt,et al.  Smartphones in Nursing Education , 2011, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[30]  Sue Greenfield,et al.  Medication error reduction and the use of PDA technology. , 2007, The Journal of nursing education.