Experimental behavior of masonry wall-to-timber elements connections strengthened with injection anchors

Abstract Out-of-plane failure mechanisms observed in stone masonry buildings subjected to seismic action are often a direct result of poor connections between structural elements. During a seismic event these weak connections become incapable of assuring proper load transmission. Therefore, the need to prevent these phenomena is of critical importance in understanding the behavior of unstrengthened masonry buildings along with the necessity of developing effective strengthening solutions. This paper presents injection anchors as a viable option to improve anchorage between masonry and timber elements on historical buildings, as for example wall-to-timber framed wall or wall-to-timber diaphragm connections. The experimental campaign consisted of quasi-static monotonic and cyclic pullout tests performed on real scale specimens, representative of wall-to-timber framed wall connections found in late 19th century buildings of downtown Lisbon, Portugal. Combined cone-bond failure was obtained in all 7 tests. Boundary conditions of the specimens greatly affected the results in terms of maximum pullout force, dissipated energy, and strength degradation. Displacement ductility of the strengthened connections is high. The force–displacement curves clearly pointed out the influence on the results of the wall’s compressive stress state and the contribution of friction in the grout/masonry interface.

[1]  Robert Park,et al.  Evaluation of ductility of structures and structural assemblages from laboratory testing , 1989 .

[2]  Ezio Giuriani,et al.  Experimental Study on the Injected Anchors Behaviour on Historical Masonry , 2010 .

[3]  Birger Gigla BOND STRENGTH OF INJECTION ANCHORS , 2004 .

[4]  Sergio Lagomarsino,et al.  Identification of Shear Parameters of Masonry Panels Through the In-Situ Diagonal Compression Test , 2008 .

[5]  Mogens Peter Nielsen,et al.  Strength of anchors in masonry , 2006 .

[6]  Jelena Milosevic,et al.  Experimental assessment of shear strength parameters on rubble stone masonry specimens , 2013 .

[7]  Ronald A. Cook,et al.  Behavior and Design of Single, Headed and Unheaded, Grouted Anchors under Tensile Load , 2003 .

[8]  Ronald A. Cook,et al.  DESIGN GUIDELINES AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ENGINEERED GROUTS , 2003 .

[9]  James Michael LaFave,et al.  Experimental structural behavior of wall-diaphragm connections for older masonry buildings , 2012 .

[10]  Ronald A. Cook,et al.  Behavior and Design of Adhesive Bonded Anchors , 2006 .

[11]  Paulo B. Lourenço,et al.  Seismic Assessment of Masonry “Gaioleiro” Buildings in Lisbon, Portugal , 2009 .

[12]  Ronald A. Cook,et al.  BEHAVIOR AND DESIGN OF SINGLE ADHESIVE ANCHORS UNDER TENSILE LOAD IN UNCRACKED CONCRETE , 1998 .

[13]  Miha Tomazevic,et al.  Earthquake-Resistant Design of Masonry Buildings , 1999 .

[14]  Jason Ingham,et al.  The seismic performance of unreinforced stone masonry buildings during the 2010-2011 Canterbury earthquake sequence , 2012 .

[15]  Daniel V. Oliveira,et al.  Experimental and numerical analysis of blocky masonry structures under cyclic loading , 2003 .

[16]  Comite Euro-International du Beton,et al.  Fastenings to Concrete and Masonry Structures , 1994 .

[17]  M. Piazza,et al.  Seismic behavior and retrofitting of joints in traditional timber roof structures , 2002 .

[18]  P. Lourenço,et al.  Modeling and vulnerability of historical city centers in seismic areas: a case study in Lisbon , 2004 .

[19]  Roberto T. Leon,et al.  Lateral Load Tests on a Two-Story Unreinforced Masonry Building , 2006 .

[20]  G. Vasconcelos Experimental investigations on the mechanics of stone masonry : characterization of granites and behavior of ancient masonry shear walls , 2005 .

[21]  Rafaela Cardoso,et al.  Seismic evaluation of old masonry buildings. Part II: Analysis of strengthening solutions for a case study , 2005 .

[22]  Sandro CHIOSTRINI,et al.  ON THE DETERMINATION OF STRENGTH OF ANCIENT MASONRY WALLS VIA EXPERIMENTAL TESTS , 1999 .

[23]  Christer Sjöström,et al.  State-of-the-art report , 1997 .