Recovery correction for quantitation in emission tomography: a feasibility study

Abstract.In emission tomography, the spread of regional tracer uptake to surrounding areas caused by limited spatial resolution of the tomograph must be taken into account when quantitating activity concentrations in vivo. Assuming linearity and stationarity, the relationship between imaged activity concentration and true activity concentration is only dependent on the geometric relationship between the limited spatial resolution of the tomograph in all three dimensions and the three-dimensional size and shape of the object. In particular it is independent of the type of object studied. This concept is characterized by the term ”recovery coefficient”. Recovery effects can be corrected for by recovery coefficients determined in a calibration measurement for lesions of simple geometrical shape. This method works on anatomical structures that can be approximated to simple geometrical objects. The aim of this study was to investigate whether recovery correction of appropriate structures is feasible in a clinical setting. Measurements were done on a positron emission tomography (PET) scanner in the 2D and 3D acquisition mode and on an analogue and digital single-photon emission tomography (SPET) system using commercially available software for image reconstruction and correction of absorption and scatter effects. The results of hot spot and cold spot phantom measurements were compared to validate the assumed conditions of linearity and stationarity. It can be concluded that a recovery correction is feasible for PET scanners down to lesions measuring about 1.5×FWHM in size, whereas with simple correction schemes, which are widely available, an object-independent recovery correction for SPET cannot be performed. This result can be attributed to imperfections in the commercially available methods for attenuation and scatter correction in SPET, which are only approximate.

[1]  M Ljungberg,et al.  Scatter and attenuation correction in SPECT using density maps and Monte Carlo simulated scatter functions. , 1990, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  E C Frey,et al.  Fast implementations of reconstruction-based scatter compensation in fully 3D SPECT image reconstruction. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  K. Lange,et al.  EM reconstruction algorithms for emission and transmission tomography. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[4]  Jerry L Prince,et al.  Measurement of Radiotracer Concentration in Brain Gray Matter Using Positron Emission Tomography: MRI-Based Correction for Partial Volume Effects , 1992, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[5]  Matt A. King,et al.  A dual-photopeak window method for scatter correction. , 1992, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  Michel Defrise,et al.  Data Acquisition and Image Reconstruction for 3D PET , 1998 .

[7]  G.L. Zeng,et al.  Non-uniform attenuation correction using simultaneous transmission and emission converging tomography , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[8]  P. Msaki,et al.  Subtraction of Compton-scattered photons in single-photon emission computerized tomography. , 1984, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  J. Zubieta,et al.  Influence of spatially heterogeneous background activity on "hot object" quantitation in brain emission computed tomography. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[10]  T G Turkington,et al.  A 3D model of non-uniform attenuation and detector response for efficient iterative reconstruction in SPECT. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Quantitation in Positron Emission Computed Tomography: 1. Effect of Object Size , 1979, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[12]  C Bohm,et al.  Corrections for Attenuation, Scattered Radiation, and Random Coincidences in a Ring Detector Positron Emission Transaxial Tomograph , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[13]  R. Jaszczak,et al.  Improved SPECT quantification using compensation for scattered photons. , 1984, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  T J Spinks,et al.  The effect of activity outside the direct field of view in a 3D-only whole-body positron tomograph. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  L. Shepp,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Reconstruction for Emission Tomography , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  E C Frey,et al.  Quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography: basics and clinical considerations. , 1994, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[17]  Advances in nuclear medicine instrumentation: considerations in the design and selection of an imaging system , 1998, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[18]  G J Hademenos,et al.  Comparison of four scatter correction methods using Monte Carlo simulated source distributions. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  R. Kessler,et al.  Analysis of emission tomographic scan data: limitations imposed by resolution and background. , 1984, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[20]  D. Newport,et al.  A Single Scatter Simulation Technique for Scatter Correction in 3D PET , 1996 .

[21]  Lee-Tzuu Chang,et al.  A Method for Attenuation Correction in Radionuclide Computed Tomography , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[22]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[23]  K. Ogawa,et al.  A practical method for position-dependent Compton-scatter correction in single photon emission CT. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[24]  N. Volkow,et al.  Quantitation of the human basal ganglia with positron emission tomography: a phantom study of the effect of contrast and axial positioning. , 1991, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.