Traceability in cattle and small ruminants in Canada.

Traceback systems for cattle and small ruminants are of international concern after the outbreaks of bovine spongiform encephalopathy in the European Union and foot and mouth disease in the United Kingdom and South America. Implementation of a national or international identification system depends on meeting a balance between cost, reliability/durability, ease of use, data transfer speed, protection from fraud, avoidance of entry into the food chain and animal welfare issues. As of 1 January 2001, Canada has instituted a national identification programme for cattle, which will have annual operating and administrative costs of Can$0.20 per head, excluding ear tags. The system will provide herd of origin traceback and individual animal identification by ear tags for all beef cattle. A number of identification technologies are available that would have advantages over visual tags, but these are currently too costly without government support (electronic identification, deoxyribonucleic acid [DNA] fingerprinting), too slow (DNA fingerprinting) or have not been tested sufficiently (retinal imaging) to warrant mandatory inclusion in a national traceback/identification system.

[1]  D. Lay,et al.  A comparative physiological and behavioral study of freeze and hot-iron branding using dairy cows. , 1992, Journal of animal science.

[2]  B. Hosie.  Problems with the use of ear tags in sheep , 1995, Veterinary Record.

[3]  E. Hunt.  Location and retention of transponders used for electronic identification of sheep , 1994 .

[4]  J. A. Basarab,et al.  Traceback success rate of an electronic feedlot to slaughter information system for beef cattle , 1997 .

[5]  Gerardo Caja,et al.  Development of a ceramic bolus for the permanent electronic identification of sheep, goat and cattle , 1999 .

[6]  H. Glimp.  Meat goat production and marketing. , 1995, Journal of animal science.

[7]  O. Ribó,et al.  Evaluation of migratory distance of passive transponders injected in different body sites of adult sheep for electronic identification , 1998 .

[8]  Rony Geers,et al.  Electronic Identification, Monitoring and Tracking of Animals , 1997 .

[9]  M. Stephens,et al.  Animal Welfare , 1939, Nature.

[10]  J. Stookey,et al.  Screening of depigmenting compounds for the development of an alternate method of branding beef cattle. , 1994, Journal of Animal Science.

[11]  K. Schwartzkopf-Genswein,et al.  Comparison of image analysis, exertion force, and behavior measurements for use in the assessment of beef cattle responses to hot-iron and freeze branding. , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[12]  W.M.G Wismans,et al.  Identification and registration of animals in the European Union , 1999 .

[13]  Tim A. McAllister,et al.  Electronic identification: Applications in beef production and research , 2000 .

[14]  A. C. Smits,et al.  Electronic identification with passive transponders in veal calves , 1999 .

[15]  Georg Wendl,et al.  Electronic identification of cattle with injectable transponders , 1999 .

[16]  K. Schwartzkopf-Genswein,et al.  Behavior of cattle during hot-iron and freeze branding and the effects on subsequent handling ease. , 1997, Journal of animal science.

[17]  P. Hasker,et al.  Implantation and recovery of identification transponders in the anal region of steers , 1992 .

[18]  B. Keen,et al.  Agriculture, Fisheries and Food , 1962, Nature.

[19]  Wim J Eradus,et al.  Animal identification and monitoring , 1999 .

[20]  Wim Rossing,et al.  Animal identification: introduction and history , 1999 .

[21]  D. Sharp.  British Broadcasting Corporation , 1984 .

[22]  Pjs Hasker,et al.  Evaluation of electronic identification transponders implanted in the rumen of cattle , 1996 .

[23]  L. D. Muller,et al.  Performance and nutrient intake of high producing Holstein cows consuming pasture or a total mixed ration. , 1998, Journal of dairy science.