Accurate De Novo Prediction of Protein Contact Map by Ultra-Deep Learning Model

Motivation Protein contacts contain key information for the understanding of protein structure and function and thus, contact prediction from sequence is an important problem. Recently exciting progress has been made on this problem, but the predicted contacts for proteins without many sequence homologs is still of low quality and not very useful for de novo structure prediction. Method This paper presents a new deep learning method that predicts contacts by integrating both evolutionary coupling (EC) and sequence conservation information through an ultra-deep neural network formed by two deep residual neural networks. The first residual network conducts a series of 1-dimensional convolutional transformation of sequential features; the second residual network conducts a series of 2-dimensional convolutional transformation of pairwise information including output of the first residual network, EC information and pairwise potential. By using very deep residual networks, we can accurately model contact occurrence patterns and complex sequence-structure relationship and thus, obtain higher-quality contact prediction regardless of how many sequence homologs are available for proteins in question. Results Our method greatly outperforms existing methods and leads to much more accurate contact-assisted folding. Tested on 105 CASP11 targets, 76 past CAMEO hard targets, and 398 membrane proteins, the average top L long-range prediction accuracy obtained by our method, one representative EC method CCMpred and the CASP11 winner MetaPSICOV is 0.47, 0.21 and 0.30, respectively; the average top L/10 long-range accuracy of our method, CCMpred and MetaPSICOV is 0.77, 0.47 and 0.59, respectively. Ab initio folding using our predicted contacts as restraints but without any force fields can yield correct folds (i.e., TMscore>0.6) for 203 of the 579 test proteins, while that using MetaPSICOV- and CCMpred-predicted contacts can do so for only 79 and 62 of them, respectively. Our contact-assisted models also have much better quality than template-based models especially for membrane proteins. The 3D models built from our contact prediction have TMscore>0.5 for 208 of the 398 membrane proteins, while those from homology modeling have TMscore>0.5 for only 10 of them. Further, even if trained mostly by soluble proteins, our deep learning method works very well on membrane proteins. In the recent blind CAMEO benchmark, our fully-automated web server implementing this method successfully folded 6 targets with a new fold and only 0.3L-2.3L effective sequence homologs, including one β protein of 182 residues, one α+β protein of 125 residues, one α protein of 140 residues, one α protein of 217 residues, one α/β of 260 residues and one α protein of 462 residues. Our method also achieved the highest F1 score on free-modeling targets in the latest CASP (Critical Assessment of Structure Prediction), although it was not fully implemented back then. Availability http://raptorx.uchicago.edu/ContactMap/

[1]  Jianlin Cheng,et al.  CONFOLD: Residue‐residue contact‐guided ab initio protein folding , 2015, Proteins.

[2]  Dumitru Erhan,et al.  Going deeper with convolutions , 2014, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[3]  Yang Zhang,et al.  A comprehensive assessment of sequence-based and template-based methods for protein contact prediction , 2008, Bioinform..

[4]  Wei Li,et al.  CoinFold: a web server for protein contact prediction and contact-assisted protein folding , 2016, Nucleic Acids Res..

[5]  Anna Tramontano,et al.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP) — round x , 2014, Proteins.

[6]  Tara N. Sainath,et al.  FUNDAMENTAL TECHNOLOGIES IN MODERN SPEECH RECOGNITION Digital Object Identifier 10.1109/MSP.2012.2205597 , 2012 .

[7]  Pierre Baldi,et al.  Deep architectures for protein contact map prediction , 2012, Bioinform..

[8]  D. Thirumalai,et al.  Pair potentials for protein folding: Choice of reference states and sensitivity of predicted native states to variations in the interaction schemes , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[9]  Jian Peng,et al.  Protein Secondary Structure Prediction Using Deep Convolutional Neural Fields , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[10]  E. Aurell,et al.  Improved contact prediction in proteins: using pseudolikelihoods to infer Potts models. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[11]  D. Baker,et al.  Assessing the utility of coevolution-based residue–residue contact predictions in a sequence- and structure-rich era , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Michael J E Sternberg,et al.  The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis , 2015, Nature Protocols.

[13]  Magnus Ekeberg,et al.  Fast pseudolikelihood maximization for direct-coupling analysis of protein structure from many homologous amino-acid sequences , 2014, J. Comput. Phys..

[14]  Thomas A. Hopf,et al.  Protein 3D Structure Computed from Evolutionary Sequence Variation , 2011, PloS one.

[15]  David E. Kim,et al.  One contact for every twelve residues allows robust and accurate topology‐level protein structure modeling , 2014, Proteins.

[16]  T. Hwa,et al.  Identification of direct residue contacts in protein–protein interaction by message passing , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  A. Tramontano,et al.  New encouraging developments in contact prediction: Assessment of the CASP11 results , 2016, Proteins.

[18]  Zhiyong Wang,et al.  Protein contact prediction by integrating joint evolutionary coupling analysis and supervised learning , 2013, Bioinform..

[19]  Markus Gruber,et al.  CCMpred—fast and precise prediction of protein residue–residue contacts from correlated mutations , 2014, Bioinform..

[20]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Rectified Linear Units Improve Restricted Boltzmann Machines , 2010, ICML.

[21]  R. Jernigan,et al.  Estimation of effective interresidue contact energies from protein crystal structures: quasi-chemical approximation , 1985 .

[22]  Sergey Ioffe,et al.  Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift , 2015, ICML.

[23]  Ronan Collobert,et al.  Recurrent Convolutional Neural Networks for Scene Labeling , 2014, ICML.

[24]  Razvan Pascanu,et al.  Theano: A CPU and GPU Math Compiler in Python , 2010, SciPy.

[25]  Alexey Drozdetskiy,et al.  JPred4: a protein secondary structure prediction server , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[26]  Alfonso Mondragón,et al.  Structural insights into the assembly of the histone deacetylase-associated Sin3L/Rpd3L corepressor complex , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  David Baker,et al.  Protein structure prediction and analysis using the Robetta server , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[28]  C. Sander,et al.  Direct-coupling analysis of residue coevolution captures native contacts across many protein families , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Jian Peng,et al.  Template-based protein structure modeling using the RaptorX web server , 2012, Nature Protocols.

[30]  J. Skolnick,et al.  Erratum: Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality (Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics (2004) 57, (702-710)) , 2007 .

[31]  Christian Cole,et al.  JPred4: a protein secondary structure prediction server , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[32]  Wei Li,et al.  RaptorX-Property: a web server for protein structure property prediction , 2016, Nucleic Acids Res..

[33]  Badri Adhikari,et al.  CONFOLD: residue-residue contact-guided ab initio protein folding , 2015 .

[34]  Marco Biasini,et al.  SWISS-MODEL: modelling protein tertiary and quaternary structure using evolutionary information , 2014, Nucleic Acids Res..

[35]  A. Biegert,et al.  HHblits: lightning-fast iterative protein sequence searching by HMM-HMM alignment , 2011, Nature Methods.

[36]  Marcin J. Skwark,et al.  Improved Contact Predictions Using the Recognition of Protein Like Contact Patterns , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[37]  C. Sander,et al.  Correlated mutations and residue contacts in proteins , 1994, Proteins.

[38]  Jenna K. Zalewski,et al.  Structure of the Shroom-Rho Kinase Complex Reveals a Binding Interface with Monomeric Shroom That Regulates Cell Morphology and Stimulates Kinase Activity* , 2016, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[39]  S. Bryant,et al.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP): Round II , 1997, Proteins.

[40]  A. Krizhevsky Convolutional Deep Belief Networks on CIFAR-10 , 2010 .

[41]  Dániel Kozma,et al.  PDBTM: Protein Data Bank of transmembrane proteins after 8 years , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[42]  Massimiliano Pontil,et al.  PSICOV: precise structural contact prediction using sparse inverse covariance estimation on large multiple sequence alignments , 2012, Bioinform..

[43]  Jianzhu Ma,et al.  Protein structure alignment beyond spatial proximity , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[44]  Guigang Zhang,et al.  Deep Learning , 2016, Int. J. Semantic Comput..

[45]  R J Read,et al.  Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. , 1998, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[46]  A. Valencia,et al.  Emerging methods in protein co-evolution , 2013, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[47]  Yang Zhang,et al.  Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality , 2004, Proteins.

[48]  Juergen Haas,et al.  The Protein Model Portal—a comprehensive resource for protein structure and model information , 2013, Database J. Biol. Databases Curation.

[49]  Yang Zhang,et al.  How significant is a protein structure similarity with TM-score = 0.5? , 2010, Bioinform..

[50]  Ron Diskin,et al.  Molecular Mechanism for LAMP1 Recognition by Lassa Virus , 2015, Journal of Virology.

[51]  Zhiyong Wang,et al.  Predicting protein contact map using evolutionary and physical constraints by integer programming , 2013, Bioinform..

[52]  A. Tramontano,et al.  Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction: Progress and new directions in round XI , 2016, Proteins.

[53]  Michael A. Trakselis,et al.  Structure of Shroom domain 2 reveals a three-segmented coiled-coil required for dimerization, Rock binding, and apical constriction , 2012, Molecular biology of the cell.

[54]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[55]  김삼묘,et al.  “Bioinformatics” 특집을 내면서 , 2000 .

[56]  David T. Jones,et al.  MetaPSICOV: combining coevolution methods for accurate prediction of contacts and long range hydrogen bonding in proteins , 2014, Bioinform..

[57]  Johannes Söding,et al.  HHsenser: exhaustive transitive profile search using HMM–HMM comparison , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[58]  Jürgen Schmidhuber,et al.  Training Very Deep Networks , 2015, NIPS.

[59]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.