Role of surgeon volume in radical prostatectomy outcomes.

PURPOSE To examine the effect of hospital and surgeon volume on postoperative outcomes and to determine whether hospital or surgeon volume is the stronger predictor. PATIENTS AND METHODS Using 1997 to 1998 claims data from a national 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries, we identified 2,292 men who underwent radical prostatectomy at 1,210 hospitals by 1,788 surgeons. Hospitals were classified as high (> or = 60 per year) or low (< 60 per year) volume according to radical prostatectomy experience over the 2-year period. Surgeons were classified as high (> or = 40 per year) or low (< 40 per year) volume. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to control for patient demographics and comorbidities when assessing the association of hospital and surgeon volume with in-hospital complications, length of stay, and anastomotic stricture rates. In-hospital complications included cardiac, respiratory, vascular, wound, genitourinary, and miscellaneous surgical and medical conditions. RESULTS High-volume surgeons had half the complication risk (odds ratio [OR] = 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32 to 0.89) and shorter lengths of stay (4.1 v 5.2 days, P =.03) compared with low-volume surgeons. High-volume hospital patients tended to have fewer anastomotic strictures (OR = 0.72; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.04). Patient age (> or = 75 years) was associated with more complications (OR = 1.9; 95% CI, 1.39 to 2.70), more anastomotic strictures (OR = 2.2; 95% CI, 1.54 to 3.15), and longer hospital stays (parameter estimate = 2.26; 95% CI, 1.75 to 2.77). CONCLUSION Surgeon volume is inversely related to in-hospital complications and length of stay in men undergoing radical prostatectomy. Hospital volume is not significantly associated with outcomes after adjusting for physician volume. Further study is necessary to elucidate the mechanism of the volume-outcome effect.

[1]  C. Pashos,et al.  Racial Differences in the Cost of Treating Men with Early‐Stage Prostate Cancer , 2001, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[2]  J W Moul,et al.  Multicenter patient self-reporting questionnaire on impotence, incontinence and stricture after radical prostatectomy. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[3]  C. Pashos,et al.  Variations in use of imaging in a national sample of men with early-stage prostate cancer. , 2002, Urology.

[4]  D McLerran,et al.  Internal validation of Medicare claims data. , 1994, Epidemiology.

[5]  J. Fowler Radical prostatectomy for stage A2 and B prostatic carcinoma. Operative experience. , 1985, Urology.

[6]  C. Pashos,et al.  A nationwide charge comparison of the principal treatments for early stage prostate carcinoma , 2000, Cancer.

[7]  Michael N. Ferrandino,et al.  Intraoperative and postoperative complications of radical retropubic prostatectomy in a consecutive series of 1,000 cases. , 2001, The Journal of urology.

[8]  M. Kattan,et al.  Risk factors for complications and morbidity after radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 1997, The Journal of urology.

[9]  T. P. Cooper,et al.  1997 American Urological Association Gallup survey: Changes in diagnosis and management of prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia, and other practice trends from 1994 to 1997. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[10]  B. Surya,et al.  Anastomotic strictures following radical prostatectomy: risk factors and management. , 1990, The Journal of urology.

[11]  A Milstein,et al.  Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths. , 2000, JAMA.

[12]  Taylor Murray,et al.  Cancer Statistics, 2001 , 2001, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[13]  S. Soumerai,et al.  Association of Physician and Hospital Volume With Use of Aspirin and Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2000, Medical care.

[14]  K. Kahn,et al.  Why do sicker patients cost more? A charge-based analysis of patients undergoing prostatectomy. , 1993, The Journal of urology.

[15]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United States , 2002 .

[16]  C. Begg,et al.  The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  M. Barry,et al.  Patient-re ported complications and follow-up treatment after radical prostatectomy , 1993 .

[18]  J. Roberts,et al.  Risk factors for vesicourethral anastomotic stricture after radical prostatectomy. , 2000, Urology.

[19]  A Milstein,et al.  Improving the safety of health care: the leapfrog initiative. , 2000, Effective clinical practice : ECP.

[20]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  The effect of hospital volume on mortality and resource use after radical prostatectomy. , 2000, The Journal of urology.

[21]  D. Rosenthal,et al.  The National Cancer Data Base report on prostate carcinoma after the peak in incidence rates in the U. S. , 1998 .

[22]  Colin B Begg,et al.  Variations in morbidity after radical prostatectomy. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  D. McCullough Manpower needs in urology in the twenty-first century. , 1998, The Urologic clinics of North America.

[24]  S. Yao,et al.  Population-based study of relationships between hospital volume of prostatectomies, patient outcomes, and length of hospital stay. , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[25]  Edward L. Hannan,et al.  Investigation of the Relationship Between Volume and Mortality for Surgical Procedures Performed in New York State Hospitals , 1989 .

[26]  M. Kattan,et al.  Risk factors for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. , 1996, The Journal of urology.

[27]  T. Stamey,et al.  Incontinence and vesical neck strictures following radical retropubic prostatectomy. , 1995, Urology.

[28]  N. Bickell,et al.  Hospital volume differences and five-year survival from breast cancer. , 1998, American journal of public health.

[29]  D McLerran,et al.  An assessment of radical prostatectomy. Time trends, geographic variation, and outcomes. The Prostate Patient Outcomes Research Team. , 1993, JAMA.

[30]  W. Catalona,et al.  Potency, continence and complication rates in 1,870 consecutive radical retropubic prostatectomies. , 1999, The Journal of urology.

[31]  C. Mettlin The American Cancer Society National Prostate Cancer Detection Project and National patterns of prostate cancer detection and treatment , 1997, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[32]  E. Klein,et al.  Early hospital discharge after radical retropubic prostatectomy: impact on cost and complication rate. , 1994, Urology.

[33]  E L Hannan,et al.  The relation between volume and outcome in health care. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[34]  S. Yao,et al.  Population-based study of long-term survival in patients with clinically localised prostate cancer , 1997, The Lancet.

[35]  C. Mackenzie,et al.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[36]  C. Begg,et al.  Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery. , 1998, JAMA.