Quality-of-life outcomes after cosmetic surgery.

Cosmetic surgery is an increasingly common medical procedure whose benefits to patients have not been quantified objectively. The purpose of this study was to prospectively examine long-term quality-of-life outcomes for patients undergoing elective cosmetic surgery. In this prospective, correlational study of 105 consecutive patients undergoing elective cosmetic surgery, the parameters of quality-of-life index, depression, social support, and coping were determined preoperatively and at 1- and 6-month intervals postoperatively. The data from the four study instruments were analyzed using Pearson correlation and repeated measures of multivariate analysis of variance for differences in each variable over time. The multivariate analysis of variance quality-of-life index scores for patients improved from baseline preoperative mean levels of 3.24 to a mean of 2.56 at 1 month, and then to 2.11 (f = 518.5, p = < 0.0001) at 6 months postsurgery. Mean scores for depression [determined by using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CESD)], improved from 11.2 preoperatively to 6.5 at 1 month, and to 6.3 (f= 79.3, p = < .0001) at 6 months after surgery. Surgical intervention produced no significant differences between preoperative and postoperative ways of coping and social support scores. Cosmetic surgery produces positive psychological benefits by significantly improving quality-of-life outcomes that persist long term, without adversely affecting social support and ways of coping.

[1]  B. Bonke,et al.  Preoperative Anxiety and Motives for Surgery , 1991, Psychological reports.

[2]  J. Richter,et al.  Coping, Social Support, and Adaptation to Chronic Illness , 1992, Western journal of nursing research.

[3]  V. Tilden,et al.  Measures of Social Support: Assessment of Validity , 1990, Nursing research.

[4]  R. Burgoyne,et al.  A Prospective Psychological Study of 50 Female Face‐Lift Patients , 1980, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[5]  Aaronson Nk Quality of life: what is it? How should it be measured? , 1988 .

[6]  C. Weinert A Social Support Measure: PRQ85 , 1987, Nursing research.

[7]  S. L. Zelen,et al.  More than Skin Deep: A Self‐Consistency Approach to the Psychology of Cosmetic Surgery , 1985, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[8]  L. Radloff The CES-D Scale , 1977 .

[9]  C. Aneshensel,et al.  Factor structure of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale among Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic Whites. , 1989 .

[10]  A. Ringberg,et al.  Augmentation mammaplasty--psychiatric and psychosocial characteristics and outcome in a group of Swedish women. , 1987, Scandinavian journal of plastic and reconstructive surgery and hand surgery.

[11]  C. Spielberger,et al.  Emotional reactions to surgery. , 1973, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[12]  M. Goin,et al.  A Prospective Study of Patients' Psychological Reactions to Rhinoplasty , 1991, Annals of plastic surgery.

[13]  D. Harris,et al.  Are rhinoplasty patients potentially mad? , 1992, British journal of plastic surgery.

[14]  A. Leplège,et al.  The problem of quality of life in medicine. , 1997, JAMA.

[15]  Virginia A. Clark,et al.  Analysis of effects of sex and age in response to items on the CES-D scale , 1981, Psychiatry Research.

[16]  C. Clifford Attkisson,et al.  Screening for Depression in Primary Care Clinics: The CES-D and the BDI , 1990, International journal of psychiatry in medicine.

[17]  Eric F. Dubow,et al.  Development of a Self-Report Coping Measure for Elementary School Children , 1992 .

[18]  G. Howard,et al.  Presurgical anxiety and postsurgical pain and adjustment: effects of a stress inoculation procedure. , 1986, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[19]  P. Shakespeare,et al.  Measuring outcome in low-priority plastic surgery patients using Quality of Life indices. , 1994, British journal of plastic surgery.