Discriminating between drugs and nondrugs by prediction of activity spectra for substances (PASS).

Using the computer system PASS (prediction of activity spectra for substances), which predicts simultaneously several hundreds of biological activities, a training set for discriminating between drugs and nondrugs is created. For the training set, two subsets of databases of drugs and nondrugs (a subset of the World Drug Index, WDI, vs the Available Chemicals Directory, ACD) are used. The high value of prediction accuracy shows that the chemical descriptors and algorithms used in PASS provide highly robust structure-activity relationships and reliable predictions. Compared to other methods applied in this field, the direct benchmark undertaken with this paper showed that the results obtained with PASS are in good accordance with these approaches. In addition, it has been shown that the more specific drug information used in the training set of PASS, the more specific discrimination between drug and nondrug can be obtained.

[1]  David J. Cummins,et al.  Molecular Diversity in Chemical Databases: Comparison of Medicinal Chemistry Knowledge Bases and Databases of Commercially Available Compounds , 1996, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[2]  Ajay,et al.  Can we learn to distinguish between "drug-like" and "nondrug-like" molecules? , 1998, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[3]  H. Kubinyi,et al.  A scoring scheme for discriminating between drugs and nondrugs. , 1998, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[4]  P. Willett,et al.  Identification of Biological Activity Profiles Using Substructural Analysis and Genetic Algorithms. , 1998 .

[5]  Ajay,et al.  Designing libraries with CNS activity. , 1999, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[6]  Tudor I. Oprea,et al.  The Design of Leadlike Combinatorial Libraries. , 1999, Angewandte Chemie.

[7]  A. Ghose,et al.  A knowledge-based approach in designing combinatorial or medicinal chemistry libraries for drug discovery. 1. A qualitative and quantitative characterization of known drug databases. , 1999, Journal of combinatorial chemistry.

[8]  Ajay,et al.  Recognizing molecules with drug-like properties. , 1999, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[9]  Vladimir Poroikov,et al.  Chemical Similarity Assessment through Multilevel Neighborhoods of Atoms: Definition and Comparison with the Other Descriptors , 1999, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[10]  J. Blake,et al.  Chemoinformatics - predicting the physicochemical properties of 'drug-like' molecules. , 2000, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[11]  Pickett,et al.  Computational methods for the prediction of 'drug-likeness' , 2000, Drug discovery today.

[12]  M. Wagener,et al.  Potential Drugs and Nondrugs: Prediction and Identification of Important Structural Features. , 2000 .

[13]  Tudor I. Oprea,et al.  Property distribution of drug-related chemical databases* , 2000, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[14]  Robert Bywater,et al.  Improving the Odds in Discriminating "Drug-like" from "Non Drug-like" Compounds , 2000, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..