What is a Correspondence Theory of Truth?

It is often thought that instances of the T-schema such as“ ‘snow is white’ is true if and only if snow is white” state correspondences between sentences andthe world, and that therefore such sentences play a crucial role in correspondence theories oftruth. I argue that this assumption trivializes the correspondence theory: even a disquotationaltheory of truth would be a correspondence theory on this conception. This discussionallows one to get clearer about what a correspondence theory does claim, and toward the end of thepaper I discuss what a true correspondence theory of truth would involve.

[1]  C. I. Lewis,et al.  The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics , 1944 .

[2]  Hartry Field,et al.  Tarski's Theory of Truth , 1972 .

[3]  N. Belnap,et al.  A prosentential theory of truth , 1975 .

[4]  Michael Williams Do We (Epistemologists) Need a Theory of Truth , 1986 .

[5]  K. Szaniawski The Vienna Circle and the Lvov-Warsaw School , 1988 .

[6]  J. Woleński,et al.  De Veritate: Austro-Polish Contributions to the Theory of Truth from Brentano to Tarski , 1989 .

[7]  D. Davidson,et al.  The Structure and Content of Truth , 1990 .

[8]  Richard L. Kirkham Theories of truth : a critical introduction , 1995 .

[9]  Hartry Field Truth. Paul Horwich , 1992 .

[10]  N. Belnap,et al.  The Revision Theory of Truth , 1993 .

[11]  Hartry Field Deflationist Views of Meaning and Content , 1994 .

[12]  Leon F. Porter,et al.  Correspondence and Disquotation: An Essay on the Nature of Truth , 1994 .

[13]  Christine Tappolet Mixed Inferences: A Problem for Pluralism About Truth Predicates , 1997 .

[14]  J. O’leary-Hawthorne,et al.  Minimalism and Truth , 1997 .

[15]  Jan Woleński,et al.  Alfred Tarski and the Vienna Circle , 1999 .

[16]  I. Niiniluoto Tarskian Truth as Correspondence — Replies to Some Objections , 1999 .

[17]  J. Peregrin Truth and Its Nature (if Any) , 1999 .

[18]  I. Niiniluoto Theories of Truth: Vienna, Berlin, and Warsaw , 1999 .

[19]  Semantic Conception of Truth as a Philosophical Theory , 1999 .

[20]  Christine Tappolet,et al.  Truth Pluralism and Many‐Valued Logics: A Reply to Beall , 2000 .

[21]  W. Lycan,et al.  Deflationism, Meaning and Truth-Conditions , 2000 .

[22]  J. Beall On Mixed Inferences and Pluralism about Truth Predicates , 2000 .

[23]  Artur Rojszczak Philosophical Background And Philosophical Content Of The Semantic Definition Of Truth , 2002 .

[24]  J. Woleński From Intentionality To Formal Semantics (From Twardowski To Tarski , 2002 .

[25]  Gila Sher,et al.  On the Possibility of a Substantive Theory of Truth , 1998, Synthese.