Flaw Tolerant Ceramic Laminates with Negligible Residual Stresses between Layers

Ceramic laminates can be designed to combine high strength with flaw tolerance. In this paper, the designing approach based on the mechanical response of residual stresses free biological layered structures is revised. The main design tools are analysed and different ceramic-ceramic systems combining stiffness, high strength and flaw tolerance with thermo-mechanical stability are described. Two main approaches have been used depending on the relative toughness of the layers and the interfaces between them. Laminates constituted by layers separated by weak interfaces, to originate crack deflection and delamination along the interface, show high thermal shock resistance but limited resistance to shear stresses and, thus, to wear. Laminates with strong interfaces that combine stiff and high strength external layers with flaw tolerant internal ones are appropriate for wear applications. In this group of materials, the combination of layers with the same phase composition and different microstructures avoids residual stresses due to thermal expansion mismatch, but the attainment of such microstructural differences implies the co-sintering of layers with large differences in the green state. The generation “in situ” during sintering of the desired microstructural differences represents an interesting alternative in terms of processing for this group of materials.

[1]  S. E. Brünings,et al.  Steel‐Reinforced Plasma Ceramics ‐ A New Multilayer Design , 2008 .

[2]  R. Cook Toughening of a Cordierite Glass–Ceramic by Compressive Surface Layers , 2005 .

[3]  John D. Currey,et al.  Hierarchies in Biomineral Structures , 2005, Science.

[4]  Brian R. Lawn,et al.  Crack Suppression in Strongly Bonded Homogeneous/Heterogeneous Laminates: A Study on Glass/Glass-Ceramic Bilayers , 2005 .

[5]  K. Katti,et al.  Modeling mechanical responses in a laminated biocomposite , 2005 .

[6]  Janet B. Davis,et al.  Fabrication and Crack Deflection in Ceramic Laminates with Porous Interlayers , 2004 .

[7]  P. Woytowitz,et al.  Crack penetration and deflection at a bimaterial interface in a four-point bend test , 2004 .

[8]  G. Tan,et al.  Effect of porous interlayers on crack deflection in ceramic laminates , 2004 .

[9]  Dong-Kyu Kim,et al.  Mullite–Aluminum Phosphate Laminated Composite Fabricated by Tape Casting , 2003 .

[10]  Yong Huang,et al.  The measurement and characterization of the interfacial toughness of Si3N4/BN composites by a three-point bending test , 2003 .

[11]  Zhigang Suo,et al.  Model for the robust mechanical behavior of nacre , 2001 .

[12]  Zhigang Suo,et al.  Deformation mechanisms in nacre , 2001 .

[13]  K. Katti,et al.  Modeling microarchitecture and mechanical behavior of nacre using 3D finite element techniques Part I Elastic properties , 2001 .

[14]  Peter Zioupos,et al.  Mechanical properties of nacre and highly mineralized bone , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  M. He,et al.  Deflection versus penetration of a wedge-loaded crack: effects of branch-crack length and penetrated-layer width , 2000 .

[16]  W. Clegg Controlling Cracks in Ceramics , 1999, Science.

[17]  Rao,et al.  Laminar Ceramics That Exhibit a Threshold Strength. , 1999, Science.

[18]  L. An,et al.  High‐Strength Alumina/Alumina:Calcium‐Hexaluminate Layer Composites , 1998 .

[19]  I. Low Synthesis and properties of in situ layered and graded aluminium titanate/alumina composites , 1998 .

[20]  W. Clegg Design of ceramic laminates for structural applications , 1998 .

[21]  H. M. Chan LAYERED CERAMICS: Processing and Mechanical Behavior , 1997 .

[22]  L. An,et al.  R-Curve Behavior of In-Situ-Toughened Al2O3:CaAl12O19 Ceramic Composites , 1996 .

[23]  S. M. Hsu,et al.  Fracture Behavior of Multilayer Silicon Nitride/Boron Nitride Ceramics , 1996 .

[24]  S. M. Hsu,et al.  Hertzian Contact Response of Tailored Silicon Nitride Multilayers , 1996 .

[25]  B. Lawn,et al.  Damage-resistant alumina-based layer composites , 1996 .

[26]  D. Marshall,et al.  Ceramic Composites of Monazite and Alumina , 1995 .

[27]  A. Evans,et al.  Crack deflection at an interface between dissimilar elastic materials: Role of residual stresses , 1994 .

[28]  F. Lange,et al.  Flexural Properties of Brittle Multilayer Materials: I, Modeling , 1994 .

[29]  J. Hutchinson,et al.  Cracking and stress redistribution in ceramic layered composites , 1993 .

[30]  T. Clyne,et al.  Fracture behaviour of ceramic laminates in bending—I. Modelling of crack propagation , 1993 .

[31]  T. Clyne,et al.  Fracture behaviour of ceramic laminates in bending—II. Comparison of model predictions with experimental data , 1993 .

[32]  M. Harmer,et al.  Design of a Laminated Ceramic Composite for Improved Strength and Toughness , 1992 .

[33]  W. Clegg,et al.  The fabrication and failure of laminar ceramic composites , 1992 .

[34]  K. Kendall,et al.  A simple way to make tough ceramics , 1990, Nature.

[35]  James R. Rice,et al.  Elastic Fracture Mechanics Concepts for Interfacial Cracks , 1988 .

[36]  Shuyi Qin,et al.  Fracture behavior of laminated SiC composites , 2004 .

[37]  Yong Huang,et al.  Effect of geometrical factors on the mechanical properties of Si3N4/BN multilayer ceramics , 2004 .

[38]  C. Jian,et al.  Mechanical properties and microstructure of a Si3N4/Ti3SiC2 multilayer composite , 2002 .

[39]  D. Kuo,et al.  Fracture of multilayer oxide composites , 1998 .

[40]  Ilhan A. Aksay,et al.  Hierarchically structured materials , 1992 .

[41]  I. Aksay,et al.  Imaging Of Hierarchically Structured Materials , 1991 .

[42]  Z. Suo,et al.  Mixed mode cracking in layered materials , 1991 .

[43]  John W. Hutchinson,et al.  Crack deflection at an interface between dissimilar elastic-materials , 1989 .