Changing the renewable fuel standard to a renewable material standard: bioethylene case study.

The narrow scope of the U.S. renewable fuel standard (RFS2) is a missed opportunity to spur a wider range of biomass use. This is especially relevant as RFS2 targets are being missed due to demand-side limitations for ethanol consumption. This paper examines the greenhouse gas (GHG) implications of a more flexible policy based on RFS2, which includes credits for chemical use of bioethanol (to produce bioethylene). A Monte Carlo simulation is employed to estimate the life-cycle GHG emissions of conventional low-density polyethylene (LDPE), made from natural gas derived ethane (mean: 1.8 kg CO2e/kg LDPE). The life-cycle GHG emissions from bioethanol and bio-LDPE are examined for three biomass feedstocks: U.S. corn (mean: 97g CO2e/MJ and 2.6 kg CO2e/kg LDPE), U.S. switchgrass (mean: -18g CO2e/MJ and -2.9 kg CO2e/kg LDPE), and Brazilian sugar cane (mean: 33g CO2e/MJ and -1.3 kg CO2e/kg LDPE); bioproduct and fossil-product emissions are compared. Results suggest that neither corn product (bioethanol or bio-LDPE) can meet regulatory GHG targets, while switchgrass and sugar cane ethanol and bio-LDPE likely do. For U.S. production, bioethanol achieves slightly greater GHG reductions than bio-LDPE. For imported Brazilian products, bio-LDPE achieves greater GHG reductions than bioethanol. An expanded policy that includes bio-LDPE provides added flexibility without compromising GHG targets.

[1]  Fabio Menten,et al.  A review of LCA greenhouse gas emissions results for advanced biofuels: The use of meta-regression analysis , 2013 .

[2]  E. Worrell,et al.  Energy use and energy intensity of the U.S. chemical industry , 2000 .

[3]  J. Bhatti,et al.  ENERGY AND ECONOMIC VALUE OF NON- RECYCLED PLASTICS (NRP) AND MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTES (MSW) THAT ARE CURRENTLY LANDFILLED IN THE FIFTY STATES , 2011 .

[4]  Leena Koottungal,et al.  International Survey of Ethylene from Steam Crackers - 2011 , 2010 .

[5]  C. Weber,et al.  Life cycle carbon footprint of shale gas: review of evidence and implications. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  K. Paustian,et al.  Energy and Environmental Aspects of Using Corn Stover for Fuel Ethanol , 2003 .

[7]  Alissa Kendall,et al.  Comparing life cycle assessments of different biofuel options. , 2013, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[8]  Jinglan Hong,et al.  Life cycle assessment of corn- and cassava-based ethylene production , 2014 .

[9]  Silvia Bargigli,et al.  Comparison of thermodynamic and environmental indexes of natural gas, syngas and hydrogen production processes , 2004 .

[10]  J E Campbell,et al.  Land-use and alternative bioenergy pathways for waste biomass. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[11]  R. Schnepf,et al.  Renewable Fuel Standard (Rfs): Overview and Issues , 2012 .

[12]  Mary Ann Curran,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment Handbook: A Guide for Environmentally Sustainable Products , 2012 .

[13]  M. Curran,et al.  A review of assessments conducted on bio-ethanol as a transportation fuel from a net energy, greenhouse gas, and environmental life cycle perspective , 2007 .

[14]  C. Boyer,et al.  Carbohydrates of the kernel. , 1987 .

[15]  Jo Dewulf,et al.  Plastic vs. fuel: Which use of the Brazilian ethanol can bring more environmental gains? , 2013 .

[16]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories , 2006 .

[17]  Deepak Rajagopal,et al.  The fuel market effects of biofuel policies and implications for regulations based on lifecycle emissions , 2013 .

[18]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  Olefins from conventional and heavy feedstocks: Energy use in steam cracking and alternative processes , 2006 .

[19]  Paulina Jaramillo,et al.  Uncertainty in Life Cycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions from United States Coal , 2012 .

[20]  Joaquim E. A. Seabra,et al.  Life cycle assessment of Brazilian sugarcane products: GHG emissions and energy use , 2011 .

[21]  K. Hungerbühler,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): Case Study on Plant - Protection Products and Implications for Decision Making (3 pp) , 2005 .

[22]  Brent D. Yacobucci,et al.  Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS): Overview and Issues [March 14, 2013] , 2013 .

[23]  Naim Afgan,et al.  Multi-criteria evaluation of hydrogen and natural gas fuelled power plant technologies , 2009 .

[24]  S. B. McLaughlin,et al.  Evaluating environmental consequences of producing herbaceous crops for bioenergy. , 1995 .

[25]  Gjalt Huppes,et al.  Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing of bioethanol from sugarcane in Brazil , 2009 .

[26]  W. M. Haynes.  CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics , 1990 .

[27]  Paulina Jaramillo,et al.  Uncertainty in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from United States natural gas end-uses and its effects on policy. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  J. Dewulf,et al.  Life cycle assessment of bioethanol‐based PVC , 2013 .

[29]  Yasunori Kikuchi,et al.  Environmental Performance of Biomass-Derived Chemical Production: A Case Study on Sugarcane-Derived Polyethylene , 2013 .

[30]  Frank Taylor,et al.  Determining the Cost of Producing Ethanol from Corn Starch and Lignocellulosic Feedstocks , 2000 .

[31]  K. Butterbach‐Bahl,et al.  Bioethanol production from sugarcane and emissions of greenhouse gases – known and unknowns , 2011 .

[32]  David Pimentel,et al.  Food Versus Biofuels: Environmental and Economic Costs , 2009 .

[33]  Richard K. Perrin,et al.  Efficiency in Midwest US corn ethanol plants: A plant survey , 2009 .

[34]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  Modelling CO2 emissions from non-energy use with the non-energy use emission accounting tables (NEAT) model , 2005 .

[35]  G. Heath,et al.  Challenges in the estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from biofuel‐induced global land‐use change , 2014 .

[36]  Andrzej Tabeau,et al.  The impact of the rebound effect of the use of first generation biofuels in the EU on greenhouse gas emissions: A critical review , 2014 .

[37]  Birka Wicke,et al.  Indirect land use change: review of existing models and strategies for mitigation , 2012 .

[38]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis , 2013 .

[39]  Thomas S. Colvin,et al.  Model-Based Technique to Determine Variable-Rate Nitrogen for Corn , 1999 .

[40]  H. S. Matthews,et al.  Uncertainty analysis of life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from petroleum-based fuels and impacts on low carbon fuel policies. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[41]  Kimberley A Mullins,et al.  Policy implications of uncertainty in modeled life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of biofuels. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[42]  Ho-Shing Wu,et al.  Ethylene Formation by Catalytic Dehydration of Ethanol with Industrial Considerations , 2012, Materials.

[43]  B. Subramaniam,et al.  Environmental impacts of ethylene production from diverse feedstocks and energy sources , 2014, Applied Petrochemical Research.

[44]  Christin Liptow,et al.  A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment Study of Polyethylene Based on Sugarcane and Crude Oil , 2012 .

[45]  R. Perrin,et al.  Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[46]  Steven De Meester,et al.  Life cycle assessment of bioethanol‐based PVC , 2013 .

[47]  Stefanie Hellweg,et al.  Uncertainty Analysis in Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): Case Study on Plant-Protection Products and Implications for Decision Making (9 pp + 3 pp) , 2005 .

[48]  S. Hoekman,et al.  A review of variability in indirect land use change assessment and modeling in biofuel policy , 2013 .

[49]  Carl A Haroian,et al.  Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 Lighting Mandate Analysis , 2012 .

[50]  J. S. Dennis,et al.  Impact of Biomass on Industry: Using Ethylene Derived from Bioethanol within the Polyester Value Chain , 2014 .