Suppressing the truth as a mechanism of deception: Delta plots reveal the role of response inhibition in lying

Lying takes more time than telling the truth. Because lying involves withholding the truth, this "lie effect" has been related to response inhibition. We investigated the response inhibition hypothesis of lying using the delta-plot method: A leveling-off of the standard increase of the lie effect with slower reaction times would be indicative of successful response inhibition. Participants performed a reaction-time task that required them to alternate between lying and truth telling in response to autobiographical questions. In two experiments, we found that the delta plot of the lie effect leveled off with longer response latencies, but only in a group of participants who had better inhibitory skills as indexed by relatively small lie effects. This finding supports the role of response inhibition in lying. We elaborate on repercussions for cognitive models of deception and the data analysis of reaction-time based lie tests.

[1]  E Berendsen,et al.  Goal neglect and inhibitory limitations: dissociable causes of interference effects in conflict situations. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[2]  Bruno Verschuere,et al.  Detecting concealed information in less than a second: response latency-based measures , 2011 .

[3]  P. Stoeter,et al.  Covariations among fMRI, skin conductance, and behavioral data during processing of concealed information , 2007, Human brain mapping.

[4]  Jeffrey J. Walczyk,et al.  A social-cognitive framework for understanding serious lies: Activation-decision-construction-action theory , 2014 .

[5]  Frederick Verbruggen,et al.  Tscope: A C library for programming cognitive experiments on the MS Windows platform , 2006, Behavior research methods.

[6]  B. Hommel.  Spontaneous decay of response-code activation , 1994, Psychological research.

[7]  Gershon Ben-Shakhar,et al.  Current Research and Potential Applications of the Concealed Information Test: An Overview , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[8]  P. McCormick.  Orienting attention without awareness. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Jeffrey N Rouder,et al.  Exploring the differences in distributional properties between Stroop and Simon effects using delta plots , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[10]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  J. Duncan.  Attention, intelligence, and the frontal lobes. , 1995 .

[12]  Adriaan Spruyt,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Learning to lie : effects of practice on the cognitive cost of lying , 2012 .

[13]  I. Wilkinson,et al.  Behavioural and functional anatomical correlates of deception in humans , 2001, Neuroreport.

[14]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: Empirical clarification through distributional analyses. , 2002 .

[15]  Jeffrey J. Walczyk,et al.  Advancing Lie Detection by Inducing Cognitive Load on Liars: A Review of Relevant Theories and Techniques Guided by Lessons from Polygraph-Based Approaches , 2013, Front. Psychology.

[16]  R. Engle,et al.  Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  Bruno Verschuere,et al.  Lie, truth, lie: the role of task switching in a deception context , 2015, Psychological research.

[18]  J. Wijnen,et al.  More than Meets the Eye: Age Differences in the Capture and Suppression of Oculomotor Action , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[19]  Nobuhito Abe,et al.  How the Brain Shapes Deception , 2011, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[20]  Peter C. M. Molenaar,et al.  On the relation between the mean and the variance of a diffusion model response time distribution , 2005 .

[21]  T. Robbins,et al.  Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[22]  E. Donchin,et al.  Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  Nicholas D. Duran,et al.  The action dynamics of overcoming the truth , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  Hiroshi Nittono,et al.  The Current and Future Status of the Concealed Information Test for Field Use , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[25]  Cleotilde Gonzalez,et al.  Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Bruno Verschuere,et al.  The ease of lying , 2011, Consciousness and Cognition.

[27]  Alternate Technologies for the Detection of Deception , 2013 .

[28]  Eric H Schumacher,et al.  Electromyographic evidence for response conflict in the exclude recognition task , 2009, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[29]  D. Lykken,et al.  Psychology and the lie detector industry. , 1974, The American psychologist.

[30]  S. Porter,et al.  Pitfalls and Opportunities in Nonverbal and Verbal Lie Detection , 2010, Psychological science in the public interest : a journal of the American Psychological Society.

[31]  Christoph Stahl,et al.  Disentangling common and specific neural subprocesses of response inhibition , 2013, NeuroImage.

[32]  D. Lykken.  The GSR in the detection of guilt. , 1959 .

[33]  A. Sack,et al.  Does the inferior frontal sulcus play a functional role in deception? A neuronavigated theta-burst transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[34]  M. J. Emerson,et al.  The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks: A Latent Variable Analysis , 2000, Cognitive Psychology.

[35]  I. Obeso,et al.  Dissociating the Role of the pre-SMA in Response Inhibition and Switching: A Combined Online and Offline TMS Approach , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[36]  D. Mandel,et al.  Right inferior frontal gyrus activation as a neural marker of successful lying , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[37]  W. Wagenaar.  My memory: A study of autobiographical memory over six years , 1986, Cognitive Psychology.

[38]  Aldert Vrij,et al.  Eliciting cues to deception and truth: What matters are the questions asked , 2012 .

[39]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[40]  T. Farrow,et al.  A cognitive neurobiological account of deception: evidence from functional neuroimaging. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[41]  K Richard Ridderinkhof,et al.  Delta plots in the study of individual differences: new tools reveal response inhibition deficits in AD/Hd that are eliminated by methylphenidate treatment. , 2005, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[42]  Richard Ridderinkhof.  Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: activation and suppression in conflict tasks , 2002, Psychological research.

[43]  Ray Johnson,et al.  The contribution of executive processes to deceptive responding , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[44]  Wolf Schwarz,et al.  Response time models of delta plots with negative-going slopes , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[45]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Function and Structure of the Right Inferior Frontal Cortex Predict Individual Differences in Response Inhibition: A Model-Based Approach , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[46]  Bruno Verschuere,et al.  Startling secrets: Startle eye blink modulation by concealed crime information , 2007, Biological Psychology.

[47]  Bruno Verschuere,et al.  Predicting the sensitivity of the Reaction Time-based Concealed Information Test , 2013 .

[48]  James D. Miles,et al.  Reaction time distribution analysis of spatial correspondence effects , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[49]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Version unknown SOURCE ( OR PART OF THE FOLLOWING SOURCE ) : Type article Title To head or to heed ? Beyond the surface of selective action inhibition : a review , 2022 .

[50]  Borís Burle,et al.  Executive control in the Simon effect: an electromyographic and distributional analysis , 2002, Psychological research.

[51]  Bruno Verschuere,et al.  Lying and executive control: an experimental investigation using ego depletion and goal neglect. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[52]  Birte U. Forstmann,et al.  Neural Mechanisms, Temporal Dynamics, and Individual Differences in Interference Control , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Subthalamic nucleus stimulation influences expression and suppression of impulsive behaviour in Parkinson's disease. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[54]  Matthias Gamer,et al.  fMRI-activation patterns in the detection of concealed information rely on memory-related effects. , 2012, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[55]  K. Yarrow,et al.  The Truth-Telling Motor Cortex: Response Competition in M1 Discloses Deceptive Behaviour , 2011, Biological Psychology.