How private-sector farm advisors change their practices: An Australian case study

Abstract There is increasing interest in the extent to which private-sector farm advisors support farmer responses to emerging challenges, such as climate variability or new forms of agricultural production. However, scholars have paid limited attention to what motivates farm advisors to develop their knowledge and how they go about changing their practice in areas outside their disciplinary expertise. This paper presents a qualitative study of the processes of change in the advisory practices of private-sector farm advisors who were provided with formal training as part of an Australian dairy sector extension program. This training focussed on the farm workforce and employment, and involved efforts to engage livestock production and agronomic advisors in this challenging area for farm management advice. We drew on theoretical concepts of practice and professional identity formation and found that engagement in the new area created conflict with how the advisors thought about their professional identity. Three key processes enabled advisory practice change: envisioning new advisory roles; experimenting with new advisory identities; and legitimisation of new advisory practices from both farmers and the advisors' business. While farming clients' demand for advice increased the advisors' interest in knowledge acquisition, this alone did not provide the environment for individual and collective reflexivity to cope with the complexity, risk and uncertainty of developing new advisory practices. The support of the dairy industry in forming a new practice community was found to assist the development of new advisory identities. A wider conceptualisation of the advisors' world (their identity, practices and their needs) is required if private-sector advisors are to play a greater role in helping farmers respond to emerging challenges.

[1]  Australian Grape Agricultural Competitiveness Green Paper , 2014 .

[2]  Marie-Noëlle Guillot,et al.  Acting as a Change Agent in Supporting Sustainable Agriculture: How to Cope with New Professional Situations? , 2011 .

[3]  Rachel Creaney,et al.  New knowledge networks of small-scale farmers in Europe’s periphery , 2017 .

[4]  Laurens Klerkx,et al.  Beyond fragmentation and disconnect: Networks for knowledge exchange in the English land management advisory system , 2012 .

[5]  John McDonagh,et al.  Power, Positionality and the View from within: Agricultural Advisers' Role in Implementing Participatory Extension Programmes in the Republic of Ireland , 2010 .

[6]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[7]  J. Mullen,et al.  Agricultural Extension Policy in Australia: Public Funding And Market Failure , 2000 .

[8]  L. Bryant The Detraditionalization of Occupational Identities in Farming in South Australia , 1999 .

[9]  Claire Lamine,et al.  Transition pathways towards a robust ecologization of agriculture and the need for system redesign. Cases from organic farming and IPM , 2011 .

[10]  L. Klerkx,et al.  Governance dynamics and the quest for coordination in pluralistic agricultural advisory systems , 2017 .

[11]  Frank Vanclay,et al.  The Many Turnings of Agricultural Extension in Australia , 2012 .

[12]  F. Landini,et al.  Towards a new paradigm for rural extensionists’ in-service training , 2017 .

[13]  Laurens Klerkx,et al.  Matching demand and supply in the agricultural knowledge infrastructure: Experiences with innovation intermediaries , 2008 .

[14]  M. Paine,et al.  Context, Participation and Discourse: The Role of the Communities of Practice Concept in Understanding Farmer Decision-Making , 2008 .

[15]  Laurens Klerkx,et al.  Building knowledge systems for sustainable agriculture: supporting private advisors to adequately address sustainable farm management in regular service contacts , 2010 .

[16]  J. Mitchell,et al.  Case and Situation Analysis , 1983 .

[17]  E. Shove Beyond the ABC: Climate Change Policy and Theories of Social Change , 2010 .

[18]  Marianne Cerf,et al.  Designing support to enhance co-operation between farmers and advisors in solving farm-management problems , 1999 .

[19]  Craig C. Lundberg Towards a general model of consultancy , 1997 .

[20]  R. Nettle,et al.  Governing Australia’s Dairy Farm Workforce: A New Terrain for Negotiating Rural Community Sustainability , 2014 .

[21]  Nathalie Couix,et al.  Learning in Agriculture: Rural Development Agents in France Caught between a Job Identity and a Professional Identity , 2007 .

[22]  Charles Watkins,et al.  Exploring Knowledge-Cultures: Precision Farming, Yield Mapping, and the Expert–Farmer Interface , 2000 .

[23]  C. Laurent,et al.  Agricultural Extension Services and Market Regulation: Learning from a Comparison of Six EU Countries , 2006 .

[24]  W. Rivera Public Sector Agricultural Extension System Reform and the Challenges Ahead , 2011 .

[25]  G. Faure,et al.  New Challenges in Agricultural Advisory Services from a Research Perspective: A Literature Review, Synthesis and Research Agenda , 2012 .

[26]  Laurens Klerkx,et al.  Using co-innovation to stimulate innovation in the New Zealand agricultural sector. , 2014 .

[27]  H. Ibarra Provisional Selves: Experimenting with Image and Identity in Professional Adaptation , 1999 .

[28]  Barbara Pini Masculinities and management in agricultural organizations worldwide , 2008 .

[29]  J. Lamers,et al.  Privatising agricultural extension: caveat emptor , 2000 .

[30]  N. Denzin,et al.  Introduction: The Discipline and Practice of Qualitative Research. , 2005 .

[31]  L. Klerkx,et al.  Lessons on Transdisciplinary Research in a Co-Innovation Programme in the New Zealand Agricultural Sector , 2014 .

[32]  A. Bryman Quantity and quality in social research , 1988 .

[33]  J. Ingram Agronomist–farmer knowledge encounters: an analysis of knowledge exchange in the context of best management practices in England , 2008 .

[34]  H. Schmidt,et al.  A measure of professional identity development for professional education , 2017 .

[35]  K. Charmaz,et al.  Constructing Grounded Theory , 2014 .

[36]  K. Prager,et al.  How does commercialisation impact on the provision of farm advisory services? Evidence from Belgium, Italy, Ireland and the UK , 2016 .

[37]  C. Murphy,et al.  The evolving extension environment: implications for dairy scientists , 2013 .

[38]  E. Schein Career Dynamics: Matching Individual and Organizational Needs , 1978 .

[39]  P. Labarthe Extension services and multifunctional agriculture. Lessons learnt from the French and Dutch contexts and approaches. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[40]  William Snyder,et al.  Cultivating Communities of Practice: A Guide to Managing Knowledge , 2002 .

[41]  Mika Pantzar,et al.  The Dynamics of Social Practice: Everyday Life and how it Changes , 2012 .

[42]  Laurens Klerkx,et al.  Systemic problems affecting co-innovation in the New Zealand Agricultural Innovation System: Identification of blocking mechanisms and underlying institutional logics , 2016 .

[43]  Pieter J. Beers,et al.  The distribution of roles and functions for upscaling and outscaling innovations in agricultural innovation systems , 2013 .

[44]  C. Laurent,et al.  The Importance of the Back‐office for Farm Advisory Services , 2013 .

[45]  Chris Garforth,et al.  Fragmentation or creative diversity? Options in the provision of land management advisory services , 2003 .