Dissociation of perception and action unmasked by the hollow-face illusion

It has been suggested that there are two separate visual streams in the human cerebral cortex: a ventral pathway that provides perceptual representations of the world and serves as a platform for cognitive operations, and a dorsal pathway that transforms visual information for the control of motor acts. Evidence for this distinction comes from neuropsychology, neuroimaging, and neurophysiology. There is also evidence from experimental psychology, with normal observers experiencing an illusion-where perception and action can be dissociated, although much of this evidence is controversial. Here, we report an experiment aimed at demonstrating a large dissociation between perception and fast action using the hollow-face illusion, in which a hollow mask looks like a normal convex face. Participants estimated the positions of small targets placed on the actually hollow but apparently normal face and used their fingers to 'flick' the targets off. Despite the presence of a compelling illusion of a normal face, the flicking movements were directed at the real, not the illusory locations of the targets. These results show that the same visual stimulus can have completely opposite effects on conscious perception and visual control of fast action.

[1]  A Mack,et al.  Saccadic programming and perceived location. , 1981, Acta psychologica.

[2]  Heinrich H Bülthoff,et al.  Is prior knowledge of object geometry used in visually guided reaching? , 2005, Journal of vision.

[3]  J E Cutting,et al.  Comparing effects of the horizontal-vertical illusion on grip scaling and judgment: relative versus absolute, not perception versus action. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  V S Ramachandran,et al.  Perceiving shape from shading. , 1988, Scientific American.

[5]  M. Goodale,et al.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand , 1995, Current Biology.

[6]  M. Goodale,et al.  Sight Unseen: An Exploration of Conscious and Unconscious Vision , 2004 .

[7]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  The use of vergence information in the programming of prehension , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Neuroimaging of cognitive functions in human parietal cortex , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[9]  Melvyn A. Goodale,et al.  The Effect of Pictorial Illusion on Prehension and Perception , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[11]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Action beyond our grasp , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  K. Grill-Spector The neural basis of object perception , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[13]  M. Perenin,et al.  Optic ataxia: a specific disruption in visuomotor mechanisms. I. Different aspects of the deficit in reaching for objects. , 1988, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  S. Glover,et al.  Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[15]  A. Milner,et al.  Visually guided reaching: bilateral posterior parietal lesions cause a switch from fast visuomotor to slow cognitive control , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[16]  M. Fahle,et al.  Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion: obstacle avoidance is not the explanation , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  R. Gregory,et al.  Knowledge in perception and illusion. , 1997, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[18]  Keiji Tanaka Columns for complex visual object features in the inferotemporal cortex: clustering of cells with similar but slightly different stimulus selectivities. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  David R. Pope,et al.  Luminance, contrast and spatial-frequency tuning of the transient-vergence system , 1998, Vision Research.

[20]  B. Bridgeman,et al.  Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion , 1981, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  K W Gish,et al.  Effect of Luminance on the Relation Between Accommodation and Convergence , 1991, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[22]  R. Gregory The intelligent eye , 1970 .

[23]  Richard T. Dyde,et al.  Two illusions of perceived orientation: one fools all of the people some of the time; the other fools all of the people all of the time , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  V Bruce,et al.  Independent Effects of Lighting, Orientation, and Stereopsis on the Hollow-Face Illusion , 1993, Perception.

[25]  M. Goodale,et al.  An evolving view of duplex vision: separate but interacting cortical pathways for perception and action , 2004, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[26]  L. Jakobson,et al.  A neurological dissociation between perceiving objects and grasping them , 1991, Nature.

[27]  M. Goodale,et al.  The visual brain in action , 1995 .

[28]  Yale E. Cohen,et al.  A common reference frame for movement plans in the posterior parietal cortex , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[30]  P. Dixon,et al.  Dynamic illusion effects in a reaching task: evidence for separate visual representations in the planning and control of reaching. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  Nicola Bruno,et al.  When does action resist visual illusions? , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.