The Pupil Dilation Response to Auditory Stimuli: Current State of Knowledge

The measurement of cognitive resource allocation during listening, or listening effort, provides valuable insight in the factors influencing auditory processing. In recent years, many studies inside and outside the field of hearing science have measured the pupil response evoked by auditory stimuli. The aim of the current review was to provide an exhaustive overview of these studies. The 146 studies included in this review originated from multiple domains, including hearing science and linguistics, but the review also covers research into motivation, memory, and emotion. The present review provides a unique overview of these studies and is organized according to the components of the Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening. A summary table presents the sample characteristics, an outline of the study design, stimuli, the pupil parameters analyzed, and the main findings of each study. The results indicate that the pupil response is sensitive to various task manipulations as well as interindividual differences. Many of the findings have been replicated. Frequent interactions between the independent factors affecting the pupil response have been reported, which indicates complex processes underlying cognitive resource allocation. This complexity should be taken into account in future studies that should focus more on interindividual differences, also including older participants. This review facilitates the careful design of new studies by indicating the factors that should be controlled for. In conclusion, measuring the pupil dilation response to auditory stimuli has been demonstrated to be sensitive method applicable to numerous research questions. The sensitivity of the measure calls for carefully designed stimuli.

[1]  D Kahneman,et al.  Perceptual Deficit during a Mental Task , 1967, Science.

[2]  S. Sirois,et al.  Pupillometry , 2012, Eye Movement Research.

[3]  E. Hess,et al.  Pupil Size in Relation to Mental Activity during Simple Problem-Solving , 1964, Science.

[4]  J. Beatty,et al.  The pupil and stimulus probability. , 1985, Psychophysiology.

[5]  Gunnar Blohm,et al.  Multisensory integration in orienting behavior: Pupil size, microsaccades, and saccades , 2017, Biological Psychology.

[6]  Canan Karatekin,et al.  Development of attentional allocation in the dual task paradigm. , 2004, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[7]  A. Zekveld,et al.  Cognitive processing load across a wide range of listening conditions: insights from pupillometry. , 2014, Psychophysiology.

[8]  Thalia Wheatley,et al.  Pupil dilation patterns reflect the contents of consciousness , 2015, Consciousness and Cognition.

[9]  Jan-Louis Kruger,et al.  Measuring the impact of subtitles on cognitive load: eye tracking and dynamic audiovisual texts , 2013, ETSA '13.

[10]  Jerker Rönnberg,et al.  Processing Load Induced by Informational Masking Is Related to Linguistic Abilities , 2012, International journal of otolaryngology.

[11]  J. Beatty,et al.  The pupillary system. , 2000 .

[12]  Isabell Wartenburger,et al.  Resource allocation and fluid intelligence: insights from pupillometry. , 2010, Psychophysiology.

[13]  Hans-Jochen Heinze,et al.  Plasticity of human auditory-evoked fields induced by shock conditioning and contingency reversal , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  H. Stanley Thompson,et al.  The Pupil. Anatomy, Physiology and Clinical Applications, Vols. I and II , 1993 .

[15]  Daniel R McCloy,et al.  Temporal alignment of pupillary response with stimulus events via deconvolution. , 2016, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  G. Thierry,et al.  ERP-pupil size correlations reveal how bilingualism enhances cognitive flexibility , 2013, Cortex.

[17]  Roberto Guidotti,et al.  Visual versus auditory Simon effect: A behavioural and physiological investigation , 2018, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[18]  Adriana A. Zekveld,et al.  Task difficulty differentially affects two measures of processing load: the pupil response during sentence processing and delayed cued recall of the sentences. , 2013, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[19]  C. Koch,et al.  Pupil dilation reflects perceptual selection and predicts subsequent stability in perceptual rivalry , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[20]  R. P. Carver Pupil dilation and its relationship to information processing during reading and listening. , 1971, The Journal of applied psychology.

[21]  J. Beatty,et al.  Pupillary responses in a pitch-discrimination task , 1967 .

[22]  J. Bradshaw Background light intensity and the pupillary response in a reaction time task , 1969 .

[23]  A. Widmann,et al.  Infant and adult pupil dilation in response to unexpected sounds. , 2016, Developmental psychobiology.

[24]  R. O’Connell,et al.  Pupil diameter covaries with BOLD activity in human locus coeruleus , 2014, Human brain mapping.

[25]  D A Johnson,et al.  Pupillary responses during a short-term memory task: cognitive processing, arousal, or both? , 1971, Journal of experimental psychology.

[26]  Guillaume Thierry,et al.  N400 Amplitude Reduction Correlates with an Increase in Pupil Size , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[27]  G. Naylor,et al.  Pupil light reflex evoked by light-emitting diode and computer screen: Methodology and association with need for recovery in daily life , 2018, PloS one.

[28]  Torbjörn Falkmer,et al.  Performance and Autonomic Responses During Motion Sickness , 2009, Hum. Factors.

[29]  Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  The pupil response is sensitive to divided attention during speech processing , 2014, Hearing Research.

[30]  Response of the foetal pupil to vibro-acoustic stimulation: a foetal attention test. , 2011 .

[31]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Effort Not Speed Characterizes Comprehension of Spoken Sentences by Older Adults with Mild Hearing Impairment , 2017, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[32]  Esther Janse,et al.  Speech rate effects on the processing of conversational speech across the adult life span. , 2016, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[33]  Vera Demberg,et al.  The Frequency of Rapid Pupil Dilations as a Measure of Linguistic Processing Difficulty , 2016, PloS one.

[34]  D. Kahneman Pupillary Responses in a Pitch-Discrimination Task , 1967 .

[35]  Thomas Lunner,et al.  Relations Between Self-Reported Daily-Life Fatigue, Hearing Status, and Pupil Dilation During a Speech Perception in Noise Task , 2017, Ear and hearing.

[36]  D Kahneman,et al.  Pupil Diameter and Load on Memory , 1966, Science.

[37]  S. Hutton,et al.  Pupil size changes during recognition memory. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[38]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[39]  Barbara Höhle,et al.  Pupillometry registers toddlers’ sensitivity to degrees of mispronunciation , 2017, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[40]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Pupillary Responses to Words That Convey a Sense of Brightness or Darkness , 2017, Psychological science.

[41]  J. A. Klein,et al.  Pupillary responses during mental activities , 1968 .

[42]  Pilar Quirós,et al.  Pupillary Dilation as an Index of Task Demands , 2009, Perceptual and motor skills.

[43]  J. Dabbs Testosterone and Pupillary Response to Auditory Sexual Stimuli , 1997, Physiology & Behavior.

[44]  Thomas Lunner,et al.  Effects of Hearing Impairment and Hearing Aid Amplification on Listening Effort: A Systematic Review , 2017, Ear and hearing.

[45]  Effects of storage load and word frequency on pupillary responses during short-term memory , 1968 .

[46]  R. F. Stanners,et al.  Pupil size and instructional set in recognition and recall. , 1972, Psychophysiology.

[47]  J M Festen,et al.  Assessing aspects of auditory handicap by means of pupil dilatation. , 1997, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[48]  T. Jung,et al.  Task performance and eye activity: predicting behavior relating to cognitive workload. , 2007, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[49]  Mark S. Gilzenrat,et al.  Pupil diameter tracks changes in control state predicted by the adaptive gain theory of locus coeruleus function , 2010, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[50]  Stefanie E. Kuchinsky,et al.  Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss. , 2013, Psychophysiology.

[51]  M. A. Recarte,et al.  Mental workload while driving: effects on visual search, discrimination, and decision making. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[52]  Elena G. Patsenko,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Pupillometry Reveals Processing Load during Spoken Language Comprehension , 2022 .

[53]  Y. Ben-nun The use of pupillometry in the study of on-line verbal processing: Evidence for depths of processing , 1986, Brain and Language.

[54]  C. Korn,et al.  A pupil size response model to assess fear learning , 2016, Psychophysiology.

[55]  L. R. Chapman,et al.  A Novel Pupillometric Method for Indexing Word Difficulty in Individuals With and Without Aphasia. , 2015, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[56]  Anna Piotrowska,et al.  Processing load during listening: The influence of task characteristics on the pupil response , 2013 .

[57]  Michael C. Hout,et al.  Memory strength and specificity revealed by pupillometry. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[58]  James S. Taylor Pupillary Response to Auditory versus Visual Mental Loading: A Pilot Study Using Super 8-Mm Photography , 1981, Perceptual and motor skills.

[59]  P Wright,et al.  Changes of Pupil Size and Rehearsal Strategies in a Short-Term Memory Task , 1971, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[60]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Driver Distraction through Conversation Measured with Pupillometry , 2017 .

[61]  Ingrid S. Johnsrude,et al.  The eye as a window to the listening brain: Neural correlates of pupil size as a measure of cognitive listening load , 2014, NeuroImage.

[62]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Energy: The Framework for Understanding Effortful Listening (FUEL) , 2016, Ear and hearing.

[63]  Thomas Lunner,et al.  Impact of noise and noise reduction on processing effort: A pupillometry study , 2017 .

[64]  Vera Demberg,et al.  Pupillometry: the Index of Cognitive Activity in a dual-task study , 2013, CogSci.

[65]  J. Panksepp,et al.  Music chills: The eye pupil as a mirror to music’s soul , 2016, Consciousness and Cognition.

[66]  W. S. Peavler,et al.  Pupil size, information overload, and performance differences. , 1974, Psychophysiology.

[67]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Evidence for Alternative Strategies of Sentence Retention , 1971, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[68]  Paul Sajda,et al.  Your Eyes Give You Away: Prestimulus Changes in Pupil Diameter Correlate with Poststimulus Task-Related EEG Dynamics , 2014, PloS one.

[69]  J. Antikainen,et al.  Neuroticism and the pupillary response to a brief exposure to noise , 1983, Biological Psychology.

[70]  C. Lew‐Williams,et al.  Bilingual infants control their languages as they listen , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[71]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Pitch Discrimination in Musicians and Non-Musicians: Effects of Harmonic Resolvability and Processing Effort , 2015, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[72]  Matthew B. Winn Rapid Release From Listening Effort Resulting From Semantic Context, and Effects of Spectral Degradation and Cochlear Implants , 2016, Trends in hearing.

[73]  Stephen M. Fleming,et al.  Relating Pupil Dilation and Metacognitive Confidence during Auditory Decision-Making , 2015, PloS one.

[74]  E. Granholm,et al.  Easier tasks can have higher processing loads: task difficulty and cognitive resource limitations in schizophrenia. , 2008, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[75]  Michael Schluroff Pupil responses to grammatical complexity of sentences , 1982, Brain and Language.

[76]  J Hyönä,et al.  Pupil Dilation as a Measure of Processing Load in Simultaneous Interpretation and Other Language Tasks , 1995, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[77]  A. Zekveld,et al.  Pupil Dilation Uncovers Extra Listening Effort in the Presence of a Single-Talker Masker , 2012, Ear and hearing.

[78]  Auditory-pupillary responses in deaf subjects. , 2010, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[79]  P. Gamito,et al.  Affective and physiological correlates of the perception of unimodal and bimodal emotional stimuli , 2017, Psicothema.

[80]  R M Gardner,et al.  Pupillary Changes during Encoding, Storage, and Retrieval of Information , 1975, Perceptual and motor skills.

[81]  Thomas Lunner,et al.  Parasympathetic Nervous System Dysfunction, as Identified by Pupil Light Reflex, and Its Possible Connection to Hearing Impairment , 2016, PloS one.

[82]  Niek J. Versfeld,et al.  Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing , 2017, Hearing Research.

[83]  J. Beatty,et al.  Phasic not tonic pupillary responses vary with auditory vigilance performance. , 1982, Psychophysiology.

[84]  A. Zekveld,et al.  Cognitive Load During Speech Perception in Noise: The Influence of Age, Hearing Loss, and Cognition on the Pupil Response , 2011, Ear and hearing.

[85]  Petra Hendriks,et al.  Pupillary responses reflect ambiguity resolution in pronoun processing , 2016 .

[86]  Ronny K. Ibrahim,et al.  Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG , 2017, Trends in hearing.

[87]  Silvia A. Bunge,et al.  Task-evoked pupillometry provides a window into the development of short-term memory capacity , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[88]  Robert F. Stanners,et al.  The pupillary response as an indicator of arousal and cognition , 1979 .

[89]  Thalia Wheatley,et al.  Pupil Dilation Patterns Spontaneously Synchronize Across Individuals During Shared Attention , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[90]  S. Steinhauer,et al.  Sympathetic and parasympathetic innervation of pupillary dilation during sustained processing. , 2004, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[91]  Andrew L. Kun,et al.  Estimating cognitive load using remote eye tracking in a driving simulator , 2010, ETRA.

[92]  Ronny K. Ibrahim,et al.  Monitoring Alpha Oscillations and Pupil Dilation across a Performance-Intensity Function , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[93]  P. Toffanin,et al.  The Timing and Effort of Lexical Access in Natural and Degraded Speech , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[94]  Jackson Beatty,et al.  Physiological Evidence that Demand for Processing Capacity Varies with Intelligence , 1981 .

[95]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Pupillometry as a Glimpse into the Neurochemical Basis of Human Memory Encoding , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[96]  Andrea K. Webb,et al.  Reduced emotional and cardiovascular reactivity to emotionally evocative stimuli in major depressive disorder. , 2015, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[97]  B. Tversky,et al.  Effects of visual and verbal presentation on cognitive load in vigilance, memory, and arithmetic tasks. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[98]  M. T. Bradley,et al.  Accuracy demonstrations, threat, and the detection of deception: cardiovascular, electrodermal, and pupillary measures. , 1981, Psychophysiology.

[99]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Cognitive and Ocular Factors Jointly Determine Pupil Responses under Equiluminance , 2016, PloS one.

[100]  R. Snowden,et al.  As Far as the Eye Can See: Relationship between Psychopathic Traits and Pupil Response to Affective Stimuli , 2017, PloS one.

[101]  Peter Hagoort,et al.  The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Pupillometry Reveals Increased Pupil Size during Indirect Request Comprehension , 2022 .

[102]  H M Simpson,et al.  Effects of a task-relevant response on pupil size. , 1969, Psychophysiology.

[103]  F. Vachon,et al.  Eyes have ears: Indexing the orienting response to sound using pupillometry. , 2018, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[104]  W. Levelt,et al.  Pupillary dilation as a measure of attention: a quantitative system analysis , 1993 .

[105]  Michael Richter,et al.  Three Decades of Research on Motivational Intensity Theory: What We Have Learned About Effort and What We Still Don't Know , 2016 .

[106]  A. Zekveld,et al.  The influence of informational masking on speech perception and pupil response in adults with hearing impairment. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[107]  A. Zekveld,et al.  Cortisol, Chromogranin A, and Pupillary Responses Evoked by Speech Recognition Tasks in Normally Hearing and Hard-of-Hearing Listeners: A Pilot Study , 2016, Ear and hearing.

[108]  H. Rijn,et al.  Pupillary response indexes the metrical hierarchy of unattended rhythmic violations , 2017, Brain and Cognition.

[109]  B. Papsin,et al.  Binaural Fusion and Listening Effort in Children Who Use Bilateral Cochlear Implants: A Psychoacoustic and Pupillometric Study , 2015, PloS one.

[110]  Torsten Dau,et al.  Impact of Background Noise and Sentence Complexity on Processing Demands during Sentence Comprehension , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[111]  Martina Zellin,et al.  In the eye of the listener: pupil dilation elucidates discourse processing. , 2011, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[112]  Andrew L. Kun,et al.  On the feasibility of using pupil diameter to estimate cognitive load changes for in-vehicle spoken dialogues , 2013, INTERSPEECH.

[113]  L. Kuchinke,et al.  Absolute pitch and pupillary response: effects of timbre and key color. , 2005, Psychophysiology.

[114]  Sandra P Marshall,et al.  Identifying cognitive state from eye metrics. , 2007, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[115]  William J. Horrey,et al.  Distraction and task engagement: How interesting and boring information impact driving performance and subjective and physiological responses. , 2017, Applied ergonomics.

[116]  R. Barry,et al.  Pupillary responses and event-related potentials as indices of the orienting reflex. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[117]  H. Aarts,et al.  The Unconscious Eye Opener , 2009, Psychological science.

[118]  E. Granholm,et al.  Differentiation of deception using pupillary responses as an index of cognitive processing. , 2001, Psychophysiology.

[119]  E. Granholm,et al.  Effects of schizophrenia and aging on pupillographic measures of working memory , 1997, Schizophrenia Research.

[120]  Alexander L. Francis,et al.  Toward a taxonomic model of attention in effortful listening , 2017, Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience.

[121]  Jennifer M. Nicholas,et al.  Dementias show differential physiological responses to salient sounds , 2015, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[122]  Stefanie E. Kuchinsky,et al.  Measuring listening-related effort and fatigue in school-aged children using pupillometry. , 2017, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[123]  L. Papeo,et al.  The Invariance Problem in Infancy , 2014, Psychological science.

[124]  M. H. Fischer,et al.  Listening to Limericks: A Pupillometry Investigation of Perceivers’ Expectancy , 2013, PloS one.

[125]  Christoph W Korn,et al.  A solid frame for the window on cognition: Modeling event-related pupil responses. , 2016, Journal of vision.

[126]  E Granholm,et al.  Pupillary responses index overload of working memory resources in schizophrenia. , 1997, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[127]  Barbara G. Shinn-Cunningham,et al.  The pupil response reveals increased listening effort when it is difficult to focus attention , 2015, Hearing Research.

[128]  R. Proctor,et al.  Temporal characteristics of primary-secondary message interference in a dichotic listening task , 1976, Memory & cognition.

[129]  J. Peelle Listening Effort: How the Cognitive Consequences of Acoustic Challenge Are Reflected in Brain and Behavior , 2017, Ear and hearing.

[130]  Jens Schmidtke Second language experience modulates word retrieval effort in bilinguals: evidence from pupillometry , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[131]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Pupillometry as a measure of cognitive effort in younger and older adults. , 2010, Psychophysiology.

[132]  G. Westermann,et al.  Pupillometry in Infancy Research , 2016 .

[133]  A. Malik,et al.  Machine Learning to Differentiate Between Positive and Negative Emotions Using Pupil Diameter , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[134]  W. Einhäuser,et al.  Pupil Dilation Signals Surprise: Evidence for Noradrenaline’s Role in Decision Making , 2011, Front. Neurosci..

[135]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Effect of stimulus uncertainty on the pupillary dilation response and the vertex evoked potential. , 1973, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[136]  A. Elliot Handbook of Approach and Avoidance Motivation , 2008 .

[137]  Michael W. Weiss,et al.  Pupils dilate for vocal or familiar music. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[138]  I. Maltzman,et al.  Pupillary activity while listening to verbal passages , 1978 .

[139]  A. Zekveld,et al.  Pupil Response as an Indication of Effortful Listening: The Influence of Sentence Intelligibility , 2010, Ear and hearing.

[140]  Stefanie E. Kuchinsky,et al.  Speech-perception training for older adults with hearing loss impacts word recognition and effort. , 2014, Psychophysiology.

[141]  Esteban Buz,et al.  The concurrent use of three implicit measures (eye movements, pupillometry, and event-related potentials) to assess receptive vocabulary knowledge in normal adults , 2016, Behavior research methods.

[142]  Sander Nieuwenhuis,et al.  Pupil Diameter Predicts Changes in the Exploration–Exploitation Trade-off: Evidence for the Adaptive Gain Theory , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[143]  J. Bradshaw Pupil size and drag state in a reaction time task , 1970 .

[144]  Eric Larson,et al.  Pupillometry shows the effort of auditory attention switching. , 2017, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[145]  Maria K. Eckstein,et al.  Beyond eye gaze: What else can eyetracking reveal about cognition and cognitive development? , 2016, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[146]  Shigeto Furukawa,et al.  Correspondences among pupillary dilation response, subjective salience of sounds, and loudness , 2015, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[147]  Stefanie E. Kuchinsky,et al.  Pupillometry reveals changes in physiological arousal during a sustained listening task. , 2017, Psychophysiology.

[148]  D. Siddle,et al.  Pupillary dilation as an index of the orienting reflex. , 1982, Psychophysiology.

[149]  Nicolas Vuillerme,et al.  Reliability of Oculometrics During a Mentally Demanding Task in Young and Old Adults , 2018, IEEE Access.

[150]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Effects of Grouping on the Pupillary Response in a Short-Term Memory Task , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[151]  Stefanie E. Kuchinsky,et al.  Task-Related Vigilance During Word Recognition in Noise for Older Adults with Hearing Loss , 2016, Experimental aging research.

[152]  Michiel A. J. Kompier,et al.  The window of my eyes: Task disengagement and mental fatigue covary with pupil dynamics , 2015, Biological Psychology.

[153]  R. H. Chaney,et al.  Pupillary Responses in Recognizing Awareness in Persons with Profound Mental Retardation , 1989, Perceptual and motor skills.

[154]  Carlos López Ramón Y Cajal Response of the foetal pupil to vibro-acoustic stimulation : A foetal attention test , 2011 .

[155]  S. Steinhauer,et al.  The Pupillary Response in Cognitive Psychophysiology and Schizophrenia a , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[156]  F. K. Berrien,et al.  An exploratory study of pupillary responses during deception , 1943 .

[157]  Veikko Surakka,et al.  Pupil size variation as an indication of affective processing , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[158]  W. Fitch,et al.  The Eye is Listening: Music-Induced Arousal and Individual Differences Predict Pupillary Responses , 2015, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[159]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Pupillary, heart rate, and skin resistance changes during a mental task. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[160]  G. Naylor,et al.  A Taxonomy of Fatigue Concepts and Their Relation to Hearing Loss , 2016, Ear and hearing.

[161]  Thomas Lunner,et al.  Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation , 2017, Hearing Research.

[162]  Jerker Rönnberg,et al.  Cognitive processing load during listening is reduced more by decreasing voice similarity than by increasing spatial separation between target and masker speech , 2014, Front. Neurosci..

[163]  R. Ornstein,et al.  Pupillary Responses During Information Processing Vary with Scholastic Aptitude Test Scores , 2022 .

[164]  Matthew B. Winn,et al.  The Impact of Auditory Spectral Resolution on Listening Effort Revealed by Pupil Dilation , 2015, Ear and hearing.

[165]  S. Steinhauer,et al.  VULNERABILITY TO SCHIZOPHRENIA: INFORMATION PROCESSING IN THE PUPIL AND EVENT-RELATED POTENTIAL , 1982 .

[166]  Jum C. Nunnally,et al.  Pupillary response as a general measure of activation , 1967 .

[167]  Mamoru Suzuki,et al.  Auditory-pupillary responses in patients with vestibular neuritis. , 2013, Journal of vestibular research : equilibrium & orientation.

[168]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  Pupil dilation reveals top–down attentional load during spatial monitoring , 2015, Biological Psychology.

[169]  R. O’Connell,et al.  Pupillometry and P3 index the locus coeruleus-noradrenergic arousal function in humans. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[170]  Julien Epps,et al.  Pupillary transient responses to within-task cognitive load variation , 2016, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[171]  Anne E. Cook,et al.  Effectiveness of Pupil Diameter in a Probable-Lie Comparison Question Test for Deception , 2009 .

[172]  E. Granholm,et al.  Pupillary responses index cognitive resource limitations. , 1996, Psychophysiology.

[173]  S. Sirois,et al.  Pupillometry , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[174]  Jennifer M. Nicholas,et al.  A physiological signature of sound meaning in dementia , 2016, Cortex.