Inhibition of return to object-based and environment-based locations

Inhibition of return (IOR) has been described in terms of two functional components. The locationbased component is associated with descriptions of spatially fixed, environmental locations; the object-based component is associated with more abstract descriptions of spatially invariant objects. In the present study, we hypothesized that the location-based component may also be associated with descriptions of spatially invariant objects because, like environment-based descriptions, object-based descriptions have an intrinsic spatial structure. To test this hypothesis, we employed a computer-generated depiction of a brick that rotated in depth between the presentations of cue and target. The results of four experiments showed that IOR accrued to locations that remained fixed with respect to the brick as well as the environment, suggesting that both object-based and environment-based descriptions can influence location-based IOR.

[1]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[2]  I. Rock,et al.  The effect on form perception of change of orientation in the third dimension. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  S. Pinker,et al.  Visual cognition : An introduction * , 1989 .

[4]  M. Posner,et al.  Components of visual orienting , 1984 .

[5]  P. Jolicoeur.  The time to name disoriented natural objects , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[6]  M. Posner,et al.  Inhibition of return : Neural basis and function , 1985 .

[7]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  E. Maylor,et al.  Inhibitory component of externally controlled covert orienting in visual space. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Movements of attention in the three spatial dimensions and the meaning of “neutral” cues , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  I. Biederman.  Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[11]  Robert Hockey,et al.  Effects of repetition on the facilitatory and inhibitory components of orienting in visual space , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  J. Bland,et al.  Large-scale bipolar wind in M82 , 1988, Nature.

[13]  Raymond Klein,et al.  Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual search , 1988, Nature.

[14]  P. Calabresi,et al.  Saccade preparation inhibits reorienting to recently attended locations. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  M. Tarr,et al.  Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Frames of reference for allocating attention to space: Evidence from the neglect syndrome , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[17]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Inhibitory tagging in visual search: A failure to replicate , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[19]  M. Tarr,et al.  When does Human Object Recognition use a Viewer-Centered Reference Frame? , 1990 .

[20]  J. Driver,et al.  Can Visual Neglect Operate in Object-centred Co-ordinates? An Affirmative Single-case Study , 1991 .

[21]  B. Gibson,et al.  Directing spatial attention within an object: altering the functional equivalence of shape descriptions. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  S. Tipper,et al.  Short Report: Object-Centred Inhibition of Return of Visual Attention , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[23]  I. Biederman,et al.  Size invariance in visual object priming , 1992 .

[24]  I. Biederman,et al.  Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. , 1992, Psychological review.

[25]  D. Kahneman,et al.  The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  H Egeth,et al.  Consequences of allocating attention to locations and to other attributes , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Interactions between object and space systems revealed through neuropsychology , 1993 .

[28]  G. Baylis,et al.  Visual attention and objects: evidence for hierarchical coding of location. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  I. Biederman,et al.  Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. , 1993 .

[30]  S. Tipper,et al.  Object-based and environment-based inhibition of return of visual attention. , 1994 .

[31]  B. Gibson,et al.  Does orientation-independent object recognition precede orientation-dependent recognition? Evidence from a cuing paradigm. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[32]  M. Posner,et al.  Sustained Concentration: Passive Filtering or Active Orienting? , 2019, Preparatory States & Processes.