Factors affecting smart learning adoption in workplaces: comparing large enterprises and SMEs

The rapid diffusion of learning through smart devices has facilitated information acquisition and improved knowledge sharing. This study analyzes the adoption and diffusion of smart learning from the human resource development (HRD) managerial perspective, based on a modified technology acceptance model which reflects perceived risk (PR) and organizational innovativeness (OI). Further, the results of a comparative analysis on large enterprises and small and medium enterprises (SMEs) reveal that their adoption of smart learning differs. First, large enterprises emphasize perceived ease of use (PEOU) as a reason for adoption, while SMEs emphasize perceived usefulness (PU). Second, while OI affects both types of enterprises, PR is statistically significant only for large enterprises. Finally, mobility and interactivity, important features of smart learning, have different effects on PEOU and PU for the two types of companies. This analysis provides useful guidance for HRD managers, solution providers, and content providers for improving workplace learning and thus creating more value for companies.

[1]  A. Yuen,et al.  Exploring teacher acceptance of e‐learning technology , 2008 .

[2]  D. Boud,et al.  Understanding Learning at Work , 1999 .

[3]  G. Hult,et al.  Innovation, Market Orientation, and Organizational Learning: An Integration and Empirical Examination , 1998 .

[4]  Erik M. van Raaij,et al.  The acceptance and use of a virtual learning environment in China , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[5]  Yen-Chun Jim Wu,et al.  Review of trends from mobile learning studies: A meta-analysis , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[6]  S. Zahra,et al.  Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis , 1995 .

[7]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[8]  Fethi Calisir,et al.  Factors affecting the intention to use a web-based learning system among blue-collar workers in the automotive industry , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  Wen-Bao Lin,et al.  Investigation on the model of consumers' perceived risk - integrated viewpoint , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  Il Im,et al.  The effects of perceived risk and technology type on users' acceptance of technologies , 2008, Inf. Manag..

[11]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[12]  P. Tynjälä.  Perspectives into learning at the workplace , 2008 .

[13]  Mike Moore,et al.  Editorial: Surviving as a distance teacher , 2001 .

[14]  Svetlana Kim,et al.  Smart Learning Services Based on Smart Cloud Computing , 2011, Sensors.

[15]  William Haseman,et al.  Time to decision: the drivers of innovation adoption decisions , 2014, Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Chorng-Shyong Ong,et al.  Factors affecting engineers' acceptance of asynchronous e-learning systems in high-tech companies , 2004, Inf. Manag..

[17]  Yu-Ru Lin,et al.  Elucidating user behavior of mobile learning: A perspective of the extended technology acceptance model , 2007, Electron. Libr..

[18]  Sumeet Gupta,et al.  Value-based Adoption of Mobile Internet: An empirical investigation , 2007, Decis. Support Syst..

[19]  Peyman Akhavan,et al.  E-Readiness Assessment of Non-Profit ICT SMEs in a Developing Country: The Case of Iran , 2008 .

[20]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective , 2003, MIS Q..

[21]  D. Sommers,et al.  A longitudinal analysis , 1992 .

[22]  Marylène Gagné,et al.  Understanding e-learning continuance intention in the workplace: A self-determination theory perspective , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  Michael Taylor,et al.  SMEs and e‐business , 2004 .

[24]  Youngho Rhee,et al.  The Role of Organizational and Individual Characteristics in Technology Acceptance , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[25]  Matti Rossi,et al.  An empirical investigation of mobile ticketing service adoption in public transportation , 2006, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[26]  R. Barnett.  Learning to work and working to learn , 2001 .

[27]  Mike Moore,et al.  Surviving as a Distance Teacher. , 2001 .

[28]  Jongsuk R. Lee,et al.  An Implementation of Computer Simulation-based Smart Learning System for Higher Education: EDISON , 2012 .

[29]  Ondrej Zach,et al.  ERP system implementation in SMEs: exploring the influences of the SME context , 2014, Enterp. Inf. Syst..

[30]  Myung-Suk Lee,et al.  A Study on the Adoption of SNS for Smart Learning in the 'Creative Activity' , 2012 .

[31]  Jae-Hyeon Ahn,et al.  Learning from the failure: experiences in the Korean telecommunications market , 2005 .

[32]  Hyojoo Son,et al.  Investigating the determinants of construction professionals' acceptance of web-based training: An extension of the technology acceptance model , 2012 .

[33]  Wenhao Huang,et al.  The roles of intrinsic motivators and extrinsic motivators in promoting e-learning in the workplace: A case from South Korea , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[34]  Yuan Li,et al.  Managerial Incentive and External Knowledge Acquisition Under Technological Uncertainty: A Nested System Perspective , 2013 .

[35]  Raafat George Saadé,et al.  The impact of cognitive absorption on perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use in on-line learning: an extension of the technology acceptance model , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[36]  Vassilios Peristeras,et al.  Enabling Problem Based Learning through Web 2.0 Technologies: PBL 2.0 , 2012, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[37]  Alistair R. Anderson,et al.  Social Structures and Entrepreneurial Networks , 2004 .

[38]  In Lee,et al.  Learners' acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[39]  A. L. Wilson,et al.  Organizational context, climate and innovativeness: adoption of imaging technology , 2002 .

[40]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  IT acceptance in a less-developed country: a motivational factor perspective , 2002, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[41]  Chin-Chao Lin,et al.  Exploring the relationship between technology acceptance model and usability test , 2013, Information Technology and Management.

[42]  Brenda Laurel,et al.  Computers as theatre , 1991 .

[43]  Feride S. Tabak,et al.  Is M-learning Versus E-learning or are They Supporting Each Other? , 2012 .

[44]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies , 2000, Management Science.

[45]  Arturo Serrano Santoyo,et al.  Implications of 4G Connectivity Related to M-Learning Contexts , 2010 .

[46]  Andrea J. Hester.  A comparative analysis of the usage and infusion of wiki and non-wiki-based knowledge management systems , 2011, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[47]  Sergio L. Toral Marín,et al.  A technological acceptance of e-learning tools used in practical and laboratory teaching, according to the European higher education area 1 , 2008, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[48]  Nian-Shing Chen,et al.  The effects of organizational learning environment factors on e-learning acceptance , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[49]  Bih-Huang Jin,et al.  Analysis of emerging technology adoption for the digital content market , 2012, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[50]  Lori Lockyer,et al.  Integrating Social Networking Technologies in Education:  A Case Study of a Formal Learning Environment , 2008, 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[51]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage , 2000, MIS Q..

[52]  Peter Kawalek,et al.  Predicting SMEs' adoption of enterprise systems , 2009, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[53]  Yung-Ming Cheng.  Exploring the roles of interaction and flow in explaining nurses' e-learning acceptance. , 2013, Nurse education today.

[54]  Dongwon Lee,et al.  Factors affecting the perceived usability of the mobile web portal services: comparing simplicity with consistency , 2013, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[55]  Pauliina Seppälä,et al.  Mobile learning in teacher training , 2003, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[56]  Hyunseung Choo,et al.  Smartphones as smart pedagogical tools: Implications for smartphones as u-learning devices , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[57]  Christer Carlsson,et al.  Factors driving the adoption of m-learning: An empirical study , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[58]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[59]  Timothy Teo,et al.  Understanding pre-service teachers' computer attitudes: applying and extending the technology acceptance model , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[60]  Brigitte Maier,et al.  Students' expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[61]  D. Dahl,et al.  The Influence and Value of Analogical Thinking during New Product Ideation , 2002 .

[62]  Yi-Chuan Hsieh,et al.  A model of organizational employees' e-learning systems acceptance , 2011, Knowl. Based Syst..

[63]  J. A. Keizer,et al.  Explaining innovative efforts of SMEs.: An exploratory survey among SMEs in the mechanical and electrical engineering sector in The Netherlands , 2002 .

[64]  Timothy Teo,et al.  A Cross-cultural Examination of the Intention to Use Technology between Singaporean and Malaysian pre-service Teachers: An Application of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[65]  Andrew B. Whinston,et al.  Creating a collaboratory in cyberspace: Theoretical foundation and an implementation , 1995, J. Organ. Comput..

[66]  Keenan A. Pituch,et al.  The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[67]  Julian Ming-Sung Cheng,et al.  Consumer acceptance of the internet as a channel of distribution in Taiwan—a channel function perspective , 2006 .