Is Investment in High Speed Rail Socially Profitable

The development of High Speed Rail (HSR) in Europe has been encouraged, and financially supported, by the European Commission. HSR technology is presented as a solution to congested roads and airports and as an efficient response for incremental demand in the coming years. However, the case for an HSR investment project is highly dependent on the existing volume of demand in the affected corridor. Using real construction, maintenance, and rolling stock costs of the European HSR lines in operation, potential time savings, standard values of time and expected demand growth, we estimate the minimum level of demand required from which investment in HSR could be considered profitable from a social perspective. Other benefits, such as providing long-term capacity where overcrowding is expected, could reduce the minimum demand thresholds reported in this paper. © 2007 LSE and the University of Bath

[1]  A. D. Owen,et al.  The characteristics of railway passenger demand. An econometric investigation. , 1987 .

[2]  Alain Bonnafous,et al.  The regional impact of the TGV , 1987 .

[3]  Milan Janic,et al.  High-speed rail and air passenger transport: A comparison of the operational environmental performance , 2003 .

[4]  M. Wegener,et al.  Accessibility and Economic Development in Europe , 1999 .

[5]  P. Rietveld.  Employment effects of changes in transportation infrastructure: methodological aspects of the gravity model , 1989 .

[6]  C. A. Nash.  The Case for High Speed Rail , 1991 .

[7]  Adib Kanafani,et al.  The full cost of high-speed rail: an engineering approach , 1997 .

[8]  Søren L. Buhl,et al.  What Causes Cost Overrun in Transport Infrastructure Projects? , 2004, 1304.4476.

[9]  D. Puga,et al.  Agglomeration in the Global Economy: A Survey of the 'New Economic Geography' , 1998 .

[10]  Leonard Merewitz,et al.  Project Evaluation: Collected Papers , 1972 .

[11]  E. Gramlich,et al.  Infrastructure Investment: A Review Essay , 1994 .

[12]  Ginés de Rus Mendoza,et al.  Análisis coste-beneficio del tren de alta velocidad en España , 1993 .

[13]  A S Fowkes,et al.  Understanding trends in inter‐city rail traffic in Great Britain , 1985 .

[14]  José A. Gómez-Ibáñez,et al.  Regulating Infrastructure: Monopoly, Contracts, and Discretion , 2003 .

[15]  S. Phang.  Strategic Development of Airport and Rail Infrastructure: The Case of Singapore , 2003 .

[16]  Sergio R. Jara-Díaz,et al.  ON THE RELATION BETWEEN USERS' BENEFITS AND THE ECONOMIC EFFECTS OF TRANSPORTATION ACTIVITIES , 1986 .

[17]  P Marks,et al.  VALUING LONG DISTANCE BUSINESS TRAVEL TIME SAVINGS FOR EVALUATION: A METHODOLOGICAL REVIEW AND APPLICATION --TRANSPORTATION PLANNING METHODS. PROCEEDINGS OF SEMINAR M HELD AT THE PTRC SUMMER ANNUAL MEETING, SUSSEX UNIVERSITY, ENGLAND, JULY 14-17, 1986. VOLUME P282 , 1986 .

[18]  C. Nash,et al.  Pricing European Transport Systems Recent Developments and Evidence from Case Studies , 2001 .

[19]  Vicente Inglada,et al.  Cost-benefit analysis of the high-speed train in Spain , 1997 .

[20]  M. Turró.  Going trans-European: Planning and Financing Transport Networks for Europe , 1999 .

[21]  D. Puga,et al.  European Regional Policies in Light of Recent Location Theories , 2001 .

[22]  R. Vickerman.  High-speed rail in Europe: experience and issues for future development , 1997 .

[23]  H. Sichelschmidt.  The EU programme “trans-European networks”—a critical assessment , 1999 .

[24]  Dimitrios A Tsamboulas,et al.  EU involvement in TEN development: network effects and European value added , 2002 .

[25]  Kurt Van Dender,et al.  The external costs of transport , 2001 .

[26]  Roger Vickerman,et al.  The regional impacts of Trans-European networks , 1995 .

[27]  F. Martin,et al.  Justifying a high-speed rail project: social value vs. regional growth , 1997 .