She’s got a ticket to ride: gender and public transit passes

Drawing on a household survey spanning 1997–2007 from Germany, this analysis investigates the decision to purchase a weekly or monthly transit pass against the backdrop of two questions: (1) Does gender play a role in determining the probability that an individual owns a pass? (2) If so, how is this role mitigated or exacerbated by other socioeconomic attributes of the individual and the household in which they reside? These questions are pursued through a combination of descriptive analyses and econometric methods, the latter of which relies on variants of the probit- and heteroskedastic probit model to control for the effects of unobserved heterogeneity that could otherwise induce biased estimates. The model uncovers several determinants of transit pass patronage over which policy makers have direct leverage, including fuel prices, the siting of transit stops, and the density of transit service. Moreover, while women are found to have a higher probability of owning a transit pass than men, the model identifies few variables whose impact differs according to gender, with the two exceptions being the number of children in the household and the distance to work. This absence of differential effects implies that policy measures to increase ridership are likely to have a roughly uniform impact among women and men.

[1]  C. Ai,et al.  Interaction terms in logit and probit models , 2003 .

[2]  P. Gordon,et al.  Gender Differences in Metropolitan Travel Behaviour , 1989 .

[3]  Elmar Brockfeld,et al.  On the Role of Gender as a Determinant of Car Use: Evidence from Germany , 2005 .

[4]  Richard Williams,et al.  Using Heterogeneous Choice Models to Compare Logit and Probit Coefficients Across Groups , 2009 .

[5]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Specification Error in Probit Models , 1985 .

[6]  A Gender-based Analysis of Work Trip Mode Choice of Suburban Montreal Commuters Using Stated Preference Data , 2004 .

[7]  Ian Manning The journey to work , 1978 .

[8]  Sandra Rosenbloom,et al.  Why Working Women Drive Alone: Implications for Travel Reduction Programs , 1994 .

[9]  Murtaza Haider,et al.  Gender-Based Analysis of Work Trip Mode Choice of Commuters in Suburban Montreal, Canada, with Stated Preference Data: , 2005 .

[10]  D. Niemeier,et al.  Travel to work and household responsibility: new evidence , 1997 .

[11]  Frank S. Koppelman,et al.  Representing the differences between female and male commute behavior in residential location choice models , 2001 .

[12]  S. Hanson,et al.  GENDER DIFFERENCES IN WORK-TRIP LENGTH: EXPLANATIONS AND IMPLICATIONS , 1985 .

[13]  Colin Vance,et al.  The impact of urban form on automobile travel: disentangling causation from correlation , 2007 .

[14]  S. Rosenbloom TRENDS IN WOMEN'S TRAVEL PATTERNS , 2000 .

[15]  C. Klöckner,et al.  Travel Mode Choice of Women , 2002 .

[16]  Manuel Frondel,et al.  Driving for fun? Comparing the effect of fuel prices on weekday and weekend fuel consumption , 2010 .

[17]  Jason Wittenberg,et al.  Making the Most Of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and Presentation , 2000 .

[18]  Colin Vance,et al.  Gender and the Automobile , 2007 .