A New Ordering Method of Basic Events in Fault Tree Analysis

The ordering of basic events is critical to fault tree analysis on the basis of binary decision diagrams (BDDs). Many attempts have been made to seek an efficient ordering result with the aim of reducing the complexity of BDD. In this article, a new ordering method, namely, priority ordering method, is proposed. The new method takes into account not only the effects of the layers of fault tree but also the repeated events, the neighboring events, and the number of events under the same gate. According to these four effects, the priorities that sort the basic events of the fault tree are defined. The new method inherits the merits of structure-based and weight-based methods. It is able to evaluate the basic events on the basis of the structure-based method and the size of the subtree on the basis of the weighted-based method. Demonstrated by the examples, the proposed priority ordering method is superior to the existing ordering methods in terms of reducing the nodes in the BDD and improving the efficiency in transforming a fault tree to a BDD. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Sarah J. Dunnett,et al.  Event-tree analysis using binary decision diagrams , 2000, IEEE Trans. Reliab..

[2]  Olivier Coudert,et al.  Fault Tree Analysis: 1020 Prime Implicants and Beyond , 1993 .

[3]  Ming Jian Zuo,et al.  Dominant multi-state systems , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[4]  Hong-Zhong Huang,et al.  Optimal Replacement Policy for Multi-State System Under Imperfect Maintenance , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[5]  Hong-Zhong Huang,et al.  Optimal Selective Maintenance Strategy for Multi-State Systems Under Imperfect Maintenance , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[6]  Sun Yan,et al.  A Novel Ordering Method of Binary Decision Diagram , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Management Science and Engineering.

[7]  Jin Jiang,et al.  Joint Failure Importance for Noncoherent Fault Trees , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[8]  Suguo Du,et al.  Comparison of Progressive Variable Ordering Methods with Fixed Ordering Heuristics for Binary Decision Diagrams , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing.

[9]  Kenneth J. Supowit,et al.  Finding the Optimal Variable Ordering for Binary Decision Diagrams , 1987, 24th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference.

[10]  Liudong Xing,et al.  Comments on PMS BDD generation in 'A BDD-based algorithm for Reliability Analysis of phased-mission systems' , 2004, IEEE Trans. Reliab..

[11]  John D. Andrews,et al.  An ordering heuristic to develop the binary decision diagram based on structural importance , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  Liudong Xing,et al.  Analysis of generalized phased-mission system reliability, performance, and sensitivity , 2002, IEEE Trans. Reliab..

[13]  John D. Andrews,et al.  Choosing a heuristic for the "fault tree to binary decision diagram" conversion, using neural networks , 2002, IEEE Trans. Reliab..

[14]  Marko Čepin Binary Decision Diagram , 2011 .

[15]  John Andrews,et al.  New approaches to evaluating fault trees , 1997 .

[16]  Roslyn M. Sinnamon,et al.  Fault tree analysis and binary decision diagrams , 1996, Proceedings of 1996 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium.

[17]  Wei Li,et al.  A Framework for Reliability Approximation of Multi-State Weighted $k$-out-of-$n$ Systems , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[18]  Wei Li,et al.  The Hierarchical Weighted Multi-State $k$-out-of- $n$ System Model and Its Application for Infrastructure Management , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[19]  Sheldon B. Akers,et al.  Binary Decision Diagrams , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Computers.

[20]  Olivier Coudert,et al.  Fault tree analysis: 10/sup 20/ prime implicants and beyond , 1993, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium 1993 Proceedings.

[21]  John Andrews,et al.  Efficient basic event orderings for binary decision diagrams , 1998, Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium. 1998 Proceedings. International Symposium on Product Quality and Integrity.