ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE

Nondetection of a species at a site does not imply that the species is absent unless the probability of detection is 1. We propose a model and likelihood-based method for estimating site occupancy rates when detection probabilities are 0.3). We estimated site occupancy rates for two anuran species at 32 wetland sites in Maryland, USA, from data collected during 2000 as part of an amphibian monitoring program, Frogwatch USA. Site occupancy rates were estimated as 0.49 for American toads (Bufo americanus), a 44% increase over the proportion of sites at which they were actually observed, and as 0.85 for spring peepers (Pseudacris crucifer), slightly above the observed proportion of 0.83.

[1]  R. Levins.  Some Demographic and Genetic Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity for Biological Control , 1969 .

[2]  G. Seber.  The estimation of animal abundance and related parameters , 1974 .

[3]  K. Burnham,et al.  Estimation of the size of a closed population when capture probabilities vary among animals , 1978 .

[4]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Statistical inference from capture data on closed animal populations , 1980 .

[5]  R. Lande,et al.  Extinction Thresholds in Demographic Models of Territorial Populations , 1987, The American Naturalist.

[6]  Paul H. Garthwaite,et al.  Quantifying Precision of Mark-Recapture Estimates Using the Bootstrap and Related Methods , 1991 .

[7]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Modeling Survival and Testing Biological Hypotheses Using Marked Animals: A Unified Approach with Case Studies , 1992 .

[8]  A Chao,et al.  Estimating population size for capture-recapture data when capture probabilities vary by time and individual animal. , 1992, Biometrics.

[9]  J. Nichols,et al.  Statistical inference for capture-recapture experiments , 1992 .

[10]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Inferences from Ecological Incidence Functions , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[11]  Kenneth H. Pollock,et al.  Estimating the number of animals in wildlife populations , 1994 .

[12]  Colin W. Clark,et al.  Extinction and Colonization Processes: Parameter Estimates from Sporadic Surveys , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[13]  I. Hanski.  A Practical Model of Metapopulation Dynamics , 1994 .

[14]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Metapopulation Dynamics: From Concepts and Observations to Predictive Models , 1997 .

[15]  Gary C. White,et al.  Monitoring Vertebrate Populations , 1998 .

[16]  MODELING COLONY-SITE DYNAMICS: A CASE STUDY OF GULL- BILLED TERNS (STERNA NILOTICA) IN COASTAL VIRGINIA , 1998 .

[17]  Gary C. White,et al.  Monitoring Vertebrate Populations , 1999 .

[18]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  PATCH OCCUPANCY MODELS OF METAPOPULATION DYNAMICS: EFFICIENT PARAMETER ESTIMATION USING IMPLICIT STATISTICAL INFERENCE , 1999 .

[19]  S. Pledger.  Unified Maximum Likelihood Estimates for Closed Capture–Recapture Models Using Mixtures , 2000, Biometrics.

[20]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2000 .

[21]  James D. Nichols,et al.  Monitoring of biological diversity in space and time , 2001 .

[22]  Bryan F. J. Manly,et al.  Negative binomial models for abundance estimation of multiple closed populations , 2001 .

[23]  Kenneth H. Pollock,et al.  Large scale wildlife monitoring studies: statistical methods for design and analysis , 2002 .

[24]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[25]  R. Lande,et al.  Demographic models of the northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) , 1988, Oecologia.