Using search theory to determine an applications selection strategy

The literature on software selection focuses mainly on identifying and ensuring the evaluation of those attributes of alternative commercial software products relevant to meeting the functional and non-functional requirements of the acquiring organisation. Once these attributes are determined, however, the firm acquiring the product must still decide on its selection strategy: which products should be evaluated, in what order, and at what point is it no longer beneficial to continue to evaluate additional products. We applied search theory to solve this problem of determining the selection strategy. This resulted in an optimal strategy but changes the way we view and manage software acquisition. In particular, the approach suggested that software acquisition may be better managed as an ongoing process instead of as a project with a distinct start and end. The approach formally incorporated the strategic importance of the application to the firm in determining the optimal strategy, a consideration that does not appear in the normal requirements-based approach to software selection.

[1]  W. Johnston,et al.  Organizational buying behavior: Toward an integrative framework , 1996 .

[2]  Patricia K. Lawlis,et al.  A Formal Process for Evaluating COTS Software Products , 2001, Computer.

[3]  Kaj Grønbæk,et al.  CSCW challenges: cooperative design in engineering projects , 1993, CACM.

[4]  T.C. Lethbridge,et al.  Guide to the Software Engineering Body of Knowledge (SWEBOK) and the Software Engineering Education Knowledge (SEEK) - a preliminary mapping , 2001, 10th International Workshop on Software Technology and Engineering Practice.

[5]  Rick Kazman,et al.  COTS-Based Software Systems: Third International Conference, ICCBSS 2004, Redondo Beach, CA, USA, February 1-4, 2004, Proceedings , 2004 .

[6]  Chen-Fu Chien,et al.  An AHP-based approach to ERP system selection , 2005 .

[7]  Hareton K. N. Leung,et al.  On the efficiency of domain-based COTS product selection method , 2002, Inf. Softw. Technol..

[8]  Neil A. M. Maiden,et al.  Acquiring COTS Software Selection Requirements , 1998, IEEE Softw..

[9]  Jacques Verville,et al.  A SIX-STAGE MODEL OF THE BUYING PROCESS FOR ERP SOFTWARE , 2003 .

[10]  Daniel Port,et al.  Assessing COTS Assessment: How Much Is Enough? , 2004, ICCBSS.

[11]  Ralph Kauffman,et al.  An optimization approach to business buyer choice sets: How many suppliers should be included? , 2005 .

[12]  Bo K. Wong,et al.  Group decision making in a multiple criteria environment: A case using the AHP in software selection , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The productivity paradox of information technology , 1993, CACM.

[14]  M. Weitzman Optimal search for the best alternative , 1978 .

[15]  Barry W. Boehm,et al.  Value-based processes for COTS-based applications , 2005, IEEE Software.

[16]  Arch G. Woodside,et al.  How Buyers Frame Problems: Revisited , 2001 .

[17]  Ing-Long Wu,et al.  A model for exploring the impact of purchasing strategies on user requirements determination of e-SRM , 2006, Inf. Manag..

[18]  Laurie J. Kirsch,et al.  Portfolios of Control Modes and IS Project Management , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[19]  Edgar H. Sibley,et al.  Feature analysis of generalized data base management systems: CODASYL Systems Committee, May 1971 , 1971 .

[20]  Ben Light,et al.  A Critical Success Factors Model for ERP Implementation , 1999, IEEE Softw..

[21]  Søren Lauesen COTS tenders and integration requirements , 2005, Requirements Engineering.

[22]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[23]  M. Ochs,et al.  A method for efficient measurement-based COTS assessment and selection method description and evaluation results , 2001, Proceedings Seventh International Software Metrics Symposium.