Computational Intelligence Approaches to Computational Aesthetics

Computational aesthetics is an area of research which attempts to develop computational methods that can perform aesthetic judgements in the same way as humans (Hoenig, 2005). It is an area of research which has not developed as a separate discipline till relatively recently. The notion of aesthetics is highly intuitive and often subjective. An aesthetic experience can be negative, positive or more subtly nuanced. Human beings have a strong and deep sense of aesthetics, however rationalising aesthetic decisions is challenging. As such developing computational models to make aesthetic decisions is particularly challenging. While computational intelligence techniques such as evolutionary algorithms have been able to solve many real world challenges, still such techniques are not widely used to solve problems that involve aesthetic decisions. Making an aesthetic decision often requires a human in the loop which in turn creates a barrier between computational intelligence and aesthetics. However recent advancements in computational aesthetics have made computer generated art and aesthetics realisable in several domains (den Heijer & Eiben, 2012; DiPaola & Gabora, 2009). The purpose of this article is to summarise the advancements in the area of computational aesthetics, challenges involved, computational intelligence approaches to art and aesthetics and possible future directions. The article first summarises early attempts to define aesthetics, through to more contemporary definitions and attempts in developing computational models of aesthetics in various domains. Then, it highlights the challenges associated with bridging the gap between aesthetics and computational intelligence. Thereafter it discusses how computational intelligence techniques are used in art and aesthetics ranging from simple classification problems to more advanced problems such as automatic generation of art artefacts, stories and simulations. The article concludes highlighting the future research directions that need to be undertaken in order to make significant advancements in computational aesthetics and its applications.

[1]  Steve R. DiPaola,et al.  Incorporating characteristics of human creativity into an evolutionary art algorithm , 2007, GECCO '07.

[2]  A. Kolmogorov Three approaches to the quantitative definition of information , 1968 .

[3]  C. D. Green,et al.  All That Glitters: A Review of Psychological Research on the Aesthetics of the Golden Section , 1995, Perception.

[4]  Sebastiano Battiato,et al.  Aesthetic scoring of digital portraits for consumer applications , 2013, Electronic Imaging.

[5]  Tsuhan Chen,et al.  > Replace This Line with Your Paper Identification Number (double-click Here to Edit) < , 2022 .

[6]  M. Bar,et al.  Humans Prefer Curved Visual Objects , 2006, Psychological science.

[7]  A. E. Eiben,et al.  Using aesthetic measures to evolve art , 2010, IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation.

[8]  George Markowsky,et al.  Misconceptions about the Golden Ratio , 1992 .

[9]  Karen B. Schloss,et al.  Visual aesthetics and human preference. , 2013, Annual review of psychology.

[10]  G. Venturini,et al.  Interactive evolution of ant paintings , 2003, The 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2003. CEC '03..

[11]  James Ze Wang,et al.  Studying Aesthetics in Photographic Images Using a Computational Approach , 2006, ECCV.

[12]  Paul J. Silvia,et al.  Do People Prefer Curved Objects? Angularity, Expertise, and Aesthetic Preference , 2009 .

[13]  Craig W. Reynolds Flocks, herds, and schools: a distributed behavioral model , 1987, SIGGRAPH.

[14]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  A tutorial on support vector regression , 2004, Stat. Comput..

[15]  Michael Barlow,et al.  Understanding the Interplay of Model Complexity and Fidelity in Multiagent Systems via an Evolutionary Framework , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games.

[16]  J. Benjafield The 'golden rectangle': some new data. , 1976, The American journal of psychology.

[17]  Nao and Iba Hitoshi Tokui,et al.  Music Composition with Interactive Evolutionary Computation , 2000 .

[18]  David J Field,et al.  Statistical regularities of art images and natural scenes: spectra, sparseness and nonlinearities. , 2007, Spatial vision.

[19]  Vicente Ordonez,et al.  High level describable attributes for predicting aesthetics and interestingness , 2011, CVPR 2011.

[20]  Mateu Sbert,et al.  Conceptualizing Birkhoff's Aesthetic Measure Using Shannon Entropy and Kolmogorov Complexity , 2007, CAe.

[21]  Shumeet Baluja,et al.  Towards Automated Artificial Evolution for Computer-generated Images , 1993, Connect. Sci..

[22]  Jon McCormack,et al.  Interactive evolution of L-System grammars for computer graphics modelling , 1993 .

[23]  Sung-Bae Cho,et al.  Application of interactive genetic algorithm to fashion design , 2000 .

[24]  Symmetry as an aesthetic factor , 1986 .

[25]  Ben R. Newell,et al.  Universal aesthetic of fractals , 2003, Comput. Graph..

[26]  Hussein A. Abbass,et al.  From Subjective to Objective Metrics for Evolutionary Story Narration Using Event Permutations , 2012, SEAL.

[27]  Frans Boselie,et al.  The aesthetic attractivity of the golden section , 1984 .

[28]  Yen-Wei Chen,et al.  Application of Interactive Genetic Algorithms to Boid Model Based Artificial Fish Schools , 2008, KES.

[29]  P. Locher,et al.  The perceptual value of symmetry , 1989 .

[30]  A. E. Eiben,et al.  Evolving Pop Art Using Scalable Vector Graphics , 2012, EvoMUSART.

[31]  P A Russell The aesthetics of rectangle proportion: effects of judgment scale and context. , 2000, The American journal of psychology.

[32]  John C. Jahnke,et al.  Unity and the Golden Section: Rules for Aesthetic Choice? , 1991 .

[33]  Michael Barlow,et al.  Fidelity and complexity of standing group conversation simulations: A framework for the evolution of Multi Agent Systems through bootstrapping human aesthetic judgments , 2012, 2012 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation.

[34]  Karl Sims,et al.  Artificial evolution for computer graphics , 1991, SIGGRAPH.

[35]  Penousal Machado,et al.  Experiments in Computational Aesthetics , 2008, The Art of Artificial Evolution.

[36]  Zurek,et al.  Algorithmic randomness and physical entropy. , 1989, Physical review. A, General physics.

[37]  Kendall L. Walton,et al.  Aesthetics—What? Why? and Wherefore? , 2007 .

[38]  C. Redies,et al.  Statistical regularities in art: Relations with visual coding and perception , 2010, Vision Research.

[39]  P. Gilmartin Aesthetic Preferences for the Proportions and Forms of Graticules , 1983 .

[40]  Nuria Oliver,et al.  Towards Computational Models of the Visual Aesthetic Appeal of Consumer Videos , 2010, ECCV.

[41]  Harold Osborne,et al.  AESTHETICS AS A BRANCH OF PHILOSOPHY , 1960 .

[42]  Hideyuki Takagi,et al.  Interactive evolutionary computation: fusion of the capabilities of EC optimization and human evaluation , 2001, Proc. IEEE.

[43]  I C McManus,et al.  The aesthetics of simple figures. , 1980, British journal of psychology.

[44]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[45]  Scott Draves,et al.  The Electric Sheep Screen-Saver: A Case Study in Aesthetic Evolution , 2005, EvoWorkshops.

[46]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining , 2017, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining.

[47]  H. Leder,et al.  Ten years of a model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments : The aesthetic episode - Developments and challenges in empirical aesthetics. , 2014, British journal of psychology.