Innovation Districts: Assessing Their Potential as a Strategy for Urban Economic Development

Innovation districts have gained attention as a fast-spreading urban economic development strategy, raising numerous questions. What are their distinguishing attributes? Are they a substantive policy innovation? Are they likely to succeed in fostering innovation and economic dynamism? We propose a definition of innovation districts based on their characteristic features. Given the ambiguity of the term in practice, this is crucial for understanding and analyzing the strategy. We then evaluate innovation districts by applying theories and current understandings of the spatial and economic development aspects of innovation, entrepreneurship, and human capital, illustrating with examples from Boston, Detroit, Saint Louis, and San Diego. We conclude that the combination of components that comprises innovation districts is both new and valuable. Innovation districts present a potential pathway for advancing regional economic development goals via the pathways of innovation and entrepreneurship. We stress the importance of rigorous empirical evaluation and research regarding a variety of practical and strategic concerns.

[1]  H. Renski,et al.  Innovation Districts and Community Building: An Effective Strategy for Community Economic Development? , 2022, Economic Development Quarterly.

[2]  C. M. Kayanan.  A critique of innovation districts: Entrepreneurial living and the burden of shouldering urban development , 2021, Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space.

[3]  J. Drucker,et al.  How Spatially Concentrated Are Industrial Clusters?: A Meta-analysis , 2021 .

[4]  Albert Roßmeier,et al.  Hybrid Urban Borderlands – Redevelopment Efforts and Shifting Boundaries In and Around Downtown San Diego , 2021, Journal of Borderlands Studies.

[5]  Todd Swanstrom,et al.  What to Make of Gentrification in Older Industrial Cities? Comparing St. Louis (USA) and Dortmund (Germany) , 2020, Urban Affairs Review.

[6]  C. M. Kayanan,et al.  Negative Consequences of Innovation-Igniting Urban Developments: Empirical Evidence from Three US Cities , 2020, Urban Planning.

[7]  Lisa Berglund.  The Shrinking City as a Growth Machine: Detroit's Reinvention of Growth through Triage, Foundation Work and Talent Attraction , 2020 .

[8]  G. Giuliano,et al.  Agglomeration economies and evolving urban form , 2019, The Annals of Regional Science.

[9]  L. Reese,et al.  Progressive Economic Development Policies: A Square PED in a Round Hole , 2019, Urban Affairs Review.

[10]  Arnault Morisson,et al.  Balancing gentrification in the knowledge economy: the case of Chattanooga’s innovation district , 2019 .

[11]  H. Renski,et al.  Innovation Districts as a Strategy for Urban Economic Development: A Comparison of Four Cases. , 2019, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[12]  R. Shields,et al.  Urban virtues and the innovative city: An experiment in placing innovation in Edmonton, Canada , 2019 .

[13]  Erik E. Lehmann,et al.  The governance of entrepreneurial ecosystems , 2019 .

[14]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Entrepreneurial ecosystems: economic, technological, and societal impacts , 2018, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[15]  Z. Sonmez,et al.  Inventor mobility and the geography of knowledge flows: evidence from the US biopharmaceutical industry , 2017 .

[16]  Patrick Adler,et al.  The city as innovation machine , 2017, The City Reader.

[17]  Gert Joost Peek,et al.  Building the Innovation Economy : City- Level Strategies for Planning, Placemaking and Promotion. , 2016 .

[18]  J. Drucker.  Reconsidering the Regional Economic Development Impacts of Higher Education Institutions in the United States , 2016 .

[19]  William R. Kerr,et al.  The Logic of Agglomeration , 2015 .

[20]  Kathryn L. Combs,et al.  The Economics of Science and Technology , 2012 .

[21]  D. Audretsch,et al.  Entrepreneurial activity and regional competitiveness: an introduction to the special issue , 2012 .

[22]  A. Agrawal,et al.  Why are Some Regions More Innovative than Others? The Role of Firm Size Diversity , 2012 .

[23]  J. Drucker.  The Spatial Extent of Agglomeration Economies: Evidence from Three U.S. Manufacturing Industries , 2012 .

[24]  L. Mozingo.  Pastoral Capitalism: A History of Suburban Corporate Landscapes , 2011 .

[25]  Richard Shearmur,et al.  Does local technological innovation lead to local development? A policy perspective , 2011 .

[26]  Antony Potter,et al.  Evolutionary agglomeration theory: increasing returns, diminishing returns, and the industry life cycle , 2011 .

[27]  James D. Riggle,et al.  Incubation Push or Business Pull? Investigating the Geography of U.S. Business Incubators , 2011 .

[28]  Elvira Uyarra,et al.  Conceptualizing the Regional Roles of Universities, Implications and Contradictions , 2010 .

[29]  M. Perry.  Controversies in Local Economic Development : Stories, Strategies, Solutions , 2010 .

[30]  S. Shane.  Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy , 2009 .

[31]  Jonathan Michie,et al.  Innovation, networks and knowledge exchange , 2008 .

[32]  H. Goldstein,et al.  Which Indicators Explain Metropolitan Economic Performance Best? Traditional or Creative Class , 2008 .

[33]  Nadine Massard,et al.  Spatial knowledge diffusion through collaborative networks , 2007 .

[34]  M. Danson.  Fuzzy concepts, scanty evidence, policy distance: the case for rigour and policy relevance in critical regional studies , 2007 .

[35]  A. Markusen.  Urban Development and the Politics of a Creative Class: Evidence from a Study of Artists , 2006 .

[36]  Harvey Goldstein,et al.  The Economic Development Impacts of Universities on Regions: Do Size and Distance Matter? , 2006 .

[37]  E. Glaeser,et al.  Urban Resurgence and the Consumer City , 2006 .

[38]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  Homegrown Solutions: Fostering Cluster Formation , 2004 .

[39]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Innovation And Spatial Externalities , 2003 .

[40]  R. Florida.  The Economic Geography of Talent , 2002 .

[41]  M. Feldman,et al.  The Economics of Science and Technology: An Overview of Initiatives to Foster Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Growth , 2002 .

[42]  John T. Scott,et al.  The Nature of Innovation Market Failure and the Design of Public Support for Private Innovation , 2000 .

[43]  S. Udayakumar.  To that city beautiful , 1996 .

[44]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[45]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  Innovative clusters and the industry life cycle , 1995 .

[46]  Steven Klepper,et al.  The tradeoff between firm size and diversity in the pursuit of technological progress , 1992, Small Business Economics.

[47]  H. Yahia,et al.  Members , 1947, PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America.

[48]  Urban! , 2023, Studien zu Kinder- und Jugendliteratur und -medien.

[49]  Prabin Khakurel,et al.  Measuring an entrepreneurial ecosystem , 2018 .

[50]  Bruce Katz,et al.  The Rise of Innovation Districts: A New Geography of Innovation in America , 2014 .

[51]  Doug Gilman.  The new geography of global innovation , 2010 .

[52]  J. Teaford.  The Metropolitan Revolution , 2006 .

[53]  Bennett Harrison,et al.  Industrial Districts: Old Wine in New Bottles? , 1992 .