A Blueprint of IR Evaluation Integrating Task and User Characteristics: Test Collection and Evaluation Metrics
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Marcin Mironczuk,et al. A recent overview of the state-of-the-art elements of text classification , 2018, Expert Syst. Appl..
[2] Pertti Vakkari,et al. Information Search Processes in Complex Tasks , 2018, CHIIR.
[3] Benno Stein,et al. An Information Nutritional Label for Online Documents , 2018, SIGIR Forum.
[4] Kalervo Järvelin,et al. Search task features in work tasks of varying types and complexity , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[5] Pia Borlund,et al. A study of the use of simulated work task situations in interactive information retrieval evaluations: A meta-evaluation , 2016, J. Documentation.
[6] Nicola Ferro,et al. The twist measure for IR evaluation: Taking user's effort into account , 2015, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[7] Pertti Vakkari,et al. Searching as learning: A systematization based on literature , 2016, J. Inf. Sci..
[8] Nicholas J. Belkin,et al. An exploration of the relationships between work task and interactive information search behavior , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[9] Kalervo Järvelin,et al. Information interaction in molecular medicine: integrated use of multiple channels , 2010, IIiX.
[10] Stephen E. Robertson,et al. Extending average precision to graded relevance judgments , 2010, SIGIR.
[11] Mark Sanderson,et al. Test Collection Based Evaluation of Information Retrieval Systems , 2010, Found. Trends Inf. Retr..
[12] W. Bruce Croft,et al. Search Engines - Information Retrieval in Practice , 2009 .
[13] G. Kazai. INitiative for the Evaluation of XML Retrieval , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.
[14] Jaana Kekäläinen,et al. Intuition-supporting visualization of user's performance based on explicit negative higher-order relevance , 2008, SIGIR '08.
[15] Donna K. Harman,et al. TREC: An overview , 2006, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[16] Peter Ingwersen,et al. The Turn - Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context , 2005, The Kluwer International Series on Information Retrieval.
[17] Jaana Kekäläinen,et al. ExpansionTool: Concept-Based Query Expansion and Construction , 2001, Information Retrieval.
[18] Pia Borlund,et al. The concept of relevance in IR , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[19] Howard Greisdorf,et al. Relevance thresholds: a multi-stage predictive model of how users evaluate information , 2003, Inf. Process. Manag..
[20] T. D. Wilson,et al. On conceptual models for information seeking and retrieval research , 2003, Inf. Res..
[21] Jaana Kekäläinen,et al. Using graded relevance assessments in IR evaluation , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[22] Jaana Kekäläinen,et al. Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques , 2002, TOIS.
[23] Eero Sormunen,et al. Liberal relevance criteria of TREC -: counting on negligible documents? , 2002, SIGIR '02.
[24] Soo Young Rieh. Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[25] K. Järvelin,et al. EVALUATING INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS UNDER THE CHALLENGES OF INTERACTION AND MULTIDIMENSIONAL DYNAMIC RELEVANCE , 2002 .
[26] Diane H. Sonnenwald,et al. User perspectives on relevance criteria: A comparison among relevant, partially relevant, and not-relevant judgments , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[27] Kalervo Järvelin,et al. Consistency of textual expression in newspaper articles: an argument for semantically based query expansion , 2001, J. Documentation.
[28] Jaana Kekäläinen,et al. Document text characteristics affect the ranking of the most relevant documents by expanded structured queries , 2001, J. Documentation.
[29] Paul Over,et al. The TREC interactive track: an annotated bibliography , 2001, Inf. Process. Manag..
[30] Amanda Spink,et al. Regions and levels: Measuring and mapping users' relevance judgments , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[31] Pertti Vakkari,et al. Changes in relevance criteria and problem stages in task performance , 2000, J. Documentation.
[32] Peter Ingwersen,et al. Measures of relative relevance and ranked half-life: performance indicators for interactive IR , 1998, SIGIR '98.
[33] Carol L. Barry,et al. Users' Criteria for Relevance Evaluation: A Cross-situational Comparison , 1998, Inf. Process. Manag..
[34] Stephen P. Harter,et al. Evaluation of information retrieval systems : Approaches, issues, and methods , 1997 .
[35] Norbert Fuhr,et al. A probabilistic relational algebra for the integration of information retrieval and database systems , 1997, TOIS.
[36] Kalervo Järvelin,et al. Task Complexity Affects Information Seeking and Use , 1995, Inf. Process. Manag..
[37] Carol L. Barry. User-Defined Relevance Criteria: An Exploratory Study , 1994, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..
[38] Allen Newell,et al. Heuristic programming: ill-structured problems , 1993 .
[39] Jeffrey Katzer,et al. A study of the overlap among document representations , 1983, SIGIR '83.
[40] T. Saracevic,et al. Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II: nature and manifestations of relevance , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[41] Tefko Saracevic,et al. RELEVANCE: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..