Whole words and decoding for short-term learning: comparisons on a "talking-computer" system.

Low-and average-ability readers in first and second grade studied a list of 36 words using a "talking-computer" system. The system highlighted and simultaneously pronounced orthographic units in the words when the children touched the words with a light pen. During two training sessions, the computer presented four groups of 9 words each, one group as whole words, one in syllabic units, one in subsyllabic units, and one as single grapheme-phoneme units. All children learned the least words with single grapheme-phoneme units, having had the greatest difficulty blending the units into words during training. The other presentation units did not differ significantly from each other for most students on post-testing. However, the low first-grade readers learned fewer words segmented and presented by subsyllables than by syllable or word units, but only for multisyllabic words. Monosyllabic words were blended and learned as easily with onset-rime segmentation as with whole word units, for all children.

[1]  Carole Edelsky,et al.  Whose Agenda Is This Anyway? A Response to McKenna, Robinson, and Miller , 1990 .

[2]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. , 1976 .

[3]  Joanna P. Williams.  Teaching Decoding With an Emphasis on Phoneme Analysis and Phoneme Blending , 1980 .

[4]  K. T. Spoehr,et al.  The role of orthographic and phonotactic rules in perceiving letter patterns. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Alexander Pollatsek,et al.  Lexical Access via an Orthographic Code? The Basic Orthographic Syllabic Structure (BOSS) Reconsidered. , 1983 .

[6]  H. Walberg,et al.  Reading Instruction: A Quantitative Analysis , 1980 .

[7]  Richard K. Olson,et al.  Reading instruction and remediation with the aid of computer speech , 1986 .

[8]  M. Carbo.  Debunking the Great Phonics Myth. , 1988 .

[9]  Spelling Patterns and the Development of Flexible Word Recognition Strategies. , 1976 .

[10]  J. A. Helfgott,et al.  Phonemic segmentation and blending skills of kindergarten children: Implications for beginning reading acquisition , 1976 .

[11]  Richard K. Olson,et al.  Implementing a long-term computerized remedial reading program with synthetic speech feedback: Hardware, software, and real-world issues , 1989 .

[12]  P. Bryant,et al.  Rhyme, rime, and the onset of reading. , 1989, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[13]  N. Bryant,et al.  Relative Effects of Various Word Synthesis Strategies on the Phonics Achievement of Learning Disabled Youngsters. , 1981 .

[14]  Helmer R. Myklebust.  Progress in Learning Disabilities , 1982 .

[15]  R Treiman,et al.  Subsyllabic units in computerized reading instruction: onset-rime vs. postvowel segmentation. , 1990, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[16]  M. Lovett,et al.  Treatment, subtype, and word type effects in dyslexic children's response to remediation , 1988, Brain and Language.

[17]  S. Jay Samuels,et al.  Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading , 1974 .

[18]  Philip B. Gough,et al.  One Second of Reading. , 1972 .

[19]  M. L. Millis,et al.  Syllables and spelling units affect feature integration in words , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Jeanne S. Chall,et al.  Learning to Read: The Great Debate 20 Years Later--A Response to "Debunking the Great Phonics Myth.". , 1989 .

[21]  Marcus Taft,et al.  Lexical access-via an orthographic code: The basic orthographic syllabic structure (BOSS) , 1979 .

[22]  Yetta M. Goodman,et al.  Learning to Read is Natural. , 1976 .

[23]  Frank R. Vellutino,et al.  Phonological Coding, Phonological Awareness, and Reading Ability: Evidence from a Longitudinal and Experimental Study. , 1987 .

[24]  Richard C. Anderson.  Becoming a Nation of Readers: The Report of the Commission on Reading , 1985 .

[25]  Hh Henk Ellermann,et al.  Effects of two forms of sound feedback on learning to read words , 1986 .

[26]  R. Treiman,et al.  How to see a reading unit , 1986 .

[27]  Jeanne Chall,et al.  The Great Debate: Ten Years Later, with a Modest Proposal for Reading Stages. , 1976 .

[28]  U. Goswami.  Children's use of analogy in learning to read: A developmental study , 1986 .

[29]  G. Lyon.  Identification and remediation of learning disability subtypes: Preliminary findings. , 1985 .