Facets of simplicity for the smartphone interface: A structural model

Motivated by the need to develop an integrated measure of simplicity perception for a smartphone user interface, our research incorporated visual aesthetics, information design, and task complexity into an extended construct of simplicity. Drawn from three distinct domains of human-computer interaction design and related areas, the new development of a simplicity construct and measurement scales were then validated. The final measurement model consisted of six components: reduction, organization, component complexity, coordinative complexity, dynamic complexity, and visual aesthetics. The following phase aimed at verifying the relationship between simplicity perception of the interface and evaluations of user satisfaction. The hypothesis was accepted that user satisfaction was positively affected by simplicity perception and that the relationship between the two constructs was very strong. The findings imply that a simplified interface design of the task performance, information hierarchy, and visual display attributes contributes to positive satisfaction evaluations when users interact with their smartphone as they engage in communication, information search, and entertainment activities.

[1]  Edward R. Tufte Visual explanations: images and quantities, evidence and narrative , 1997 .

[2]  Nigel Bevan,et al.  International standards for HCI and usability , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[3]  M. Gilly,et al.  Shopping Online for Freedom, Control, and Fun , 2001 .

[4]  Paul van Schaik,et al.  The role of context in perceptions of the aesthetics of web pages over time , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[5]  Edward R. Tufte,et al.  Envisioning Information , 1990 .

[6]  James D. Hollan,et al.  A diary study of mobile information needs , 2008, CHI.

[7]  Prashant C. Palvia,et al.  Developing and validating an instrument for measuring user-perceived web quality , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[8]  Yili Liu,et al.  Webpage aesthetics, performance and usability: Design variables and their effects , 2009, Ergonomics.

[9]  D. Campbell Task Complexity: A Review and Analysis , 1988 .

[10]  Sucheta Nadkarni,et al.  A Task-Based Model of Perceived Website Complexity , 2007, MIS Q..

[11]  William D. Kalsbeek,et al.  Internet and Web use in the U.S. , 1996, CACM.

[12]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Web Home Page Complexity and Communication Effectiveness , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[13]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Dependent Variable , 1992, Inf. Syst. Res..

[14]  Yili Liu,et al.  Effects of Symmetry and Number of Compositional Elements on Interface and Design Aesthetics , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[15]  Richard H. Hall,et al.  The impact of web page text-background colour combinations on readability, retention, aesthetics and behavioural intention , 2004, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[16]  John Maeda,et al.  The laws of simplicity , 2006, Design, technology, business, life.

[17]  Roger Frost,et al.  International Organization for Standardization (ISO) , 2004 .

[18]  Derick O. Steinmann The effects of cognitive feedback and task complexity in multiple-cue probability learning , 1976 .

[19]  Paul van Schaik,et al.  Five Psychometric Scales for Online Measurement of the Quality of Human-Computer Interaction in Web Sites , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[20]  Ping Zhang,et al.  Satisfiers and dissatisfiers: a two-factor model for website design and evaluation , 2000 .

[21]  Hans J. Eysenck,et al.  The empirical determination of an aesthetic formula. , 1941 .

[22]  William J. Doll,et al.  The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction , 1988, MIS Q..

[23]  Gerrit Hirschfeld,et al.  High and low spatial frequencies in website evaluations , 2010, Ergonomics.

[24]  D. Berlyne Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics: Steps Toward an Objective Psychology of Aesthetic Appreciation, , 1974 .

[25]  Sammy W. Pearson,et al.  Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction , 1983 .

[26]  Morten Moshagen,et al.  Facets of visual aesthetics , 2010, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[27]  David Chek Ling Ngo,et al.  Modelling interface aesthetics , 2003, Inf. Sci..

[28]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[29]  Matt Jones,et al.  Mobile Interaction Design , 2006 .

[30]  N. Tractinsky,et al.  What is beautiful is usable , 2000, Interact. Comput..

[31]  Kasper Hornbæk,et al.  Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[32]  Jonathan Earthy,et al.  The Benefits of Using ISO 13407: Human Centred Design Process for Interactive Systems , 2001, INTERACT.

[33]  Dianne Cyr,et al.  Web site design, trust, satisfaction and e-loyalty: the Indian experience , 2008, Online Inf. Rev..

[34]  R. Wood Task complexity: Definition of the construct , 1986 .

[35]  Noam Tractinsky,et al.  Evaluating the consistency of immediate aesthetic perceptions of web pages , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[36]  Noam Tractinsky,et al.  Assessing dimensions of perceived visual aesthetics of web sites , 2004 .

[37]  Maria De Marsico,et al.  Evaluating web sites: exploiting user's expectations , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[38]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Designing web usability , 1999 .

[39]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  The Interplay of Beauty, Goodness, and Usability in Interactive Products , 2004, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[40]  Jonathan W. Palmer,et al.  Web Site Usability, Design, and Performance Metrics , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[41]  Fatemeh Zahedi,et al.  The Measurement of Web-Customer Satisfaction: An Expectation and Disconfirmation Approach , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[42]  E. Tufte Beautiful Evidence , 2006 .

[43]  Jinwoo Kim,et al.  Designing emotionally evocative homepages: an empirical study of the quantitative relations between design factors and emotional dimensions , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[44]  P. Hekkert,et al.  'Most advanced, yet acceptable': typicality and novelty as joint predictors of aesthetic preference in industrial design. , 2003, British journal of psychology.

[45]  Marc Hassenzahl,et al.  User experience - a research agenda , 2006, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[46]  Marilyn Domas White,et al.  Identifying user-based criteria for Web pages , 1997, Internet Res..

[47]  John Knight,et al.  Homepage aesthetics: The search for preference factors and the challenges of subjectivity , 2006, Interact. Comput..

[48]  Alexandre N. Tuch,et al.  Visual complexity of websites: Effects on users' experience, physiology, performance, and memory , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[49]  Chulwoo Kim,et al.  Evaluating and Improving a Self-Help Technical Support Web Site: Use of Focus Group Interviews , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[50]  P. Kotler Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control , 1972 .

[51]  Alain Abran,et al.  Usability Meanings and Interpretations in ISO Standards , 2003, Software Quality Journal.

[52]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .