Raising the Stakes. Passing State Budgets in Scandinavia

Abstract State budget reforms in Sweden and Norway have increased the political importance of annual parliamentary state budget votes. Informal changes of the process in Denmark have had a similar effect. This article analyzes state budget agreements in the Scandinavian countries over the last 35 years. Its results indicate that the governments of the three countries have become more prone to commit themselves to binding coalitional arrangements with other parties. In these countries with frequent minority governments, this involves institutionalized incorporation of support parties and legislative accommodations in securing a majority for the state budget.

[1]  W. Müller,et al.  Coalition theory and cabinet governance : an introduction , 2008 .

[2]  Mark Hallerberg The Role of Parliamentary Committees in the Budgetary Process within Europe , 2000 .

[3]  J. Thygesen Houe, S. 2013. CO2- beskatning i et EU-retligt nationalt perspektiv. 1st ed. København: Jurist- og Økonomforbundets Forlag , 2014 .

[4]  D. Arter Democracy in Scandinavia: Consensual, majoritarian or mixed? , 2006 .

[5]  C. Green-Pedersen Minority Governments and Party Politics: The Political and Institutional Background to the “Danish Miracle” , 2001, Journal of Public Policy.

[6]  T. Bergman Formation rules and minority governments , 1993 .

[7]  Joachim Wehner Budget reform and legislative control in Sweden , 2007 .

[8]  P. Molander Budgeting Procedures and Democratic Ideals: An Evaluation of Swedish Reforms , 2001, Journal of Public Policy.

[9]  E. Damgaard,et al.  Parliamentary Opposition under Minority Parliamentarism: Scandinavia , 2008 .

[10]  T. Feddersen,et al.  Cohesion in Legislatures and the Vote of Confidence Procedure , 1998, American Political Science Review.

[11]  M. Debus,et al.  Legislative agenda-setting in parliamentary democracies , 2009 .

[12]  P. Pierson Irresistible forces, immovable objects: post-industrial welfare states confront permanent austerity , 1998 .

[13]  Kaare W. Strøm,et al.  A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties , 1990 .

[14]  Alberto Alesina,et al.  Fiscal Discipline and the Budget Process , 1996 .

[15]  Anna Ullström Samarbetskanslierna - Vårtor på, länkar till eller delar av Regeringskansliet? : Om den demokratiska styrningskedjan och samarbetskansliernas organisering , 2005 .

[16]  H. Silfverhielm,et al.  Sweden , 1996, The Lancet.

[17]  A. Lupia,et al.  Bargaining, Transaction Costs, and Coalition Governance , 2008 .

[18]  C. Green-Pedersen,et al.  Bloc Politics vs. Broad Cooperation? the functioning of Danish minority parliamentarism , 2005 .

[19]  T. Bergman,et al.  Captives No Longer, but Servants Still? Contract Parliamentarism and the New Minority Governance in Sweden and New Zealand 1 , 2006, Government and Opposition.

[20]  Gretchen Helmke,et al.  Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda , 2004, Perspectives on Politics.

[21]  Robert Klemmensen Forlig i det danske folketing 1953-2001 , 2005 .

[22]  T. Bergman,et al.  A Taste of Honey Is Worse Than None at All? , 2006 .

[23]  L. Helland Minority‐Rule Budgeting under a De Facto Constructive Vote of No Confidence: A Cure for the Norwegian Illness? , 2004 .