Bottom‐up control and co‐occurrence in complex communities: honeydew and nectar determine a rainforest ant mosaic

Complex distribution patterns of species-rich insect communities in tropical rainforests have been intensively studied, and yet we know very little about processes that generate these patterns. We provide evidence for the key role of homopteran honeydew and plant nectar in structuring ant communities in an Australian tropical rainforest canopy and understorey. We also test the ant visitation of these resources against predictions derived from the ‘ant-mosaic’ hypothesis. Two ant species were highly dominant in terms of territorial behaviour and abundance: Oecophylla smaragdina and Anonychomyrma gilberti . Both dominant ant species monopolised large aggregations of honeydew-producing homopterans. Attended homopteran species were highly segregated between these two ant species. For the use of extrafloral and floral nectar (involving 43 ant species on 48 plant species), partitioning of ant species among plant species and between canopy and understorey was also significant, but less pronounced. In contrast to trophobioses, simultaneous co-occurrence of different nectar foraging ant species on the same plant individuals was frequent (23% of all surveys). While both dominant ant species were mutually exclusive on honeydew and nectar sources, cooccurrence with non-dominant ant species on nectaries was common. The proportion of visits with co-occurrences was low for dominant ants and high for many subordinate species. These findings support the ant mosaic theory. The differential role of honeydew (as a specialised resource for dominant ants) and nectar (as an opportunistic resource for all ants including the co-occurring non-dominant species) provides a plausible structuring mechanism for the Australian canopy ant community studied.

[1]  A. Andersen.  Regulation of "Momentary" Diversity by Dominant Species in Exceptionally Rich Ant Communities of the Australian Seasonal Tropics , 1992, The American Naturalist.

[2]  N. Gotelli.  Null model analysis of species co-occurrence patterns , 2000 .

[3]  C. Horvitz,et al.  EFFECTS OF ANTS AND AN ANT-TENDED HERBIVORE ON SEED PRODUCTION OF A NEOTROPICAL HERB , 1984 .

[4]  P. Room.  [Soil and water loss from cultivated slope land derived from granite under different cropping systems in Three-Gorges reservoir areas]. , 1975 .

[5]  K. Fiedler.  Ants that associate with Lycaeninae butterfly larvae: diversity, ecology and biogeography , 2001 .

[6]  N. Blüthgen,et al.  Aphis clerodendri Matsumura (Hemiptera: Aphididae), attendant ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and associates on Clerodendrum (Verbenaceae) in Australia , 2003 .

[7]  L. Stone,et al.  The checkerboard score and species distributions , 1990, Oecologia.

[8]  W. Barthlott,et al.  How plants shape the ant community in the Amazonian rainforest canopy: the key role of extrafloral nectaries and homopteran honeydew , 2000, Oecologia.

[9]  T. Bourgoin,et al.  Ant species that protect figs against other ants: Result of territoriality induced by a mutualistic homopteran , 1997 .

[10]  M. Lowman,et al.  Ecology and diversity of tropical forest canopy ants. , 1995 .

[11]  Lars Chittka,et al.  Generalization in Pollination Systems, and Why it Matters , 1996 .

[12]  D. Davidson,et al.  Resource discovery versus resource domination in ants: a functional mechanism for breaking the trade‐off , 1998 .

[13]  D. Davidson,et al.  Explaining the Abundance of Ants in Lowland Tropical Rainforest Canopies , 2003, Science.

[14]  N. Blüthgen,et al.  COMPETITION FOR COMPOSITION: LESSONS FROM NECTAR-FEEDING ANT COMMUNITIES , 2004 .

[15]  M. Brian.  Production ecology of ants and termites , 1978 .

[16]  M. Kaspari,et al.  Community structure and the habitat templet: ants in the tropical forest canopy and litter , 2000 .

[17]  Jeff Ollerton,et al.  Latitudinal trends in plant‐pollinator interactions: are tropical plants more specialised? , 2002 .

[18]  D. Tilman.  Resource competition and community structure. , 1983, Monographs in population biology.

[19]  J. Schoereder,et al.  Are all ant mosaics caused by competition? , 2002, Oecologia.

[20]  P. Room.  The Relative Distributions of Ant Species in Ghana's Cocoa Farms , 1971 .

[21]  D. Leston.  Entomology of the cocoa farm. , 1970 .

[22]  S. Adedoyin,et al.  The abundance and inter-specific relations of common ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) on cocoa farms in western Nigeria , 1978 .

[23]  D. Davidson,et al.  The evolutionary ecology of symbiotic ant-plant relationships , 1993 .

[24]  Donald A. Jackson.  Ant distribution patterns in a cameroonian cocoa plantation: investigation of the ant mosaic hypothesis , 1984, Oecologia.

[25]  S. Shattuck.  Australian Ants: Their Biology and Identification , 1999 .

[26]  Y. Hochberg.  A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance , 1988 .

[27]  N. Blüthgen,et al.  Ant nests in tank bromeliads — an example of non-specific interaction , 2000, Insectes Sociaux.

[28]  M. Brian.  Food Collection by a Scottish Ant Community , 1955 .

[29]  J. Majer.  The maintenance of the ant mosaic in Ghana cocoa farms , 1976 .

[30]  M. Kaspari.  Testing resource-based models of patchiness in four Neotropical litter ant assemblages , 1996 .

[31]  J. Tracey.  The Vegetation of the Humid Tropical Region of North Queensland. , 1983 .

[32]  J. Majer.  The ant mosaic in Ghana cocoa farms , 1972 .

[33]  N. Blüthgen,et al.  Preferences for sugars and amino acids and their conditionality in a diverse nectar‐feeding ant community , 2004 .

[34]  M. Hossaert-McKey,et al.  Differential associations with ants of three cooccurring extrafloral nectary-bearing plants , 2001 .

[35]  R. Kitching,et al.  North—South Patterns within Arboreal Ant Assemblages from Rain Forests in Eastern Australia 1 , 2001 .

[36]  N. Gotelli,et al.  NULL MODELS IN ECOLOGY , 1996 .

[37]  M. Hunter,et al.  Playing Chutes and Ladders: Heterogeneity and the Relative Roles of Bottom‐Up and Top‐Down Forces in Natural Communities , 1992, Ecology.

[38]  D. Schemske.  Ecological Correlates of a Neotropical Mutualism: Ant Assemblages at Costus extrafloral Nectaries , 1982 .

[39]  A. Floren,et al.  Do ant mosaics exist in pristine lowland rain forests? , 2000, Oecologia.

[40]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  AN EMPIRICAL MODEL OF SPECIES COEXISTENCE IN A SPATIALLY STRUCTURED ENVIRONMENT , 2001 .

[41]  J. Majer.  Comparison of the arboreal ant mosaic in Ghana, Brazil, Papua New Guinea and Australia - its structure and influence on arthropod diversity. , 1993 .

[42]  N. Blüthgen,et al.  Interactions between weaver ants Oecophylla smaragdina, homopterans, trees and lianas in an Australian rain forest canopy , 2002 .

[43]  K. Fiedler.  Diet breadth and host plant diversity of tropical‐ vs. temperate‐zone herbivores: South‐East Asian and West Palaearctic butterflies as a case study , 1998 .

[44]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Light-Gap disturbances, recruitment limitation, and tree diversity in a neotropical forest , 1999, Science.

[45]  C J Lumsden,et al.  Territorial strategies in ants. , 1980, Science.

[46]  N. Blüthgen,et al.  Disentangling a rainforest food web using stable isotopes: dietary diversity in a species-rich ant community , 2003, Oecologia.

[47]  A. Dejean,et al.  LIMITED AGGRESSIVENESS AMONG AFRICAN ARBOREAL ANTS (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE) SHARING THE SAME TERRITORIES : THE RESULT OF A CO-EVOLUTIONARY PROCESS , 1998 .

[48]  B. Hölldobler,et al.  Butterflies and ants: The communicative domain , 2005, Experientia.

[49]  A. E. Douglas.  The nutritional quality of phloem sap utilized by natural aphid populations , 1993 .

[50]  Vojtech Novotny,et al.  Low host specificity of herbivorous insects in a tropical forest , 2002, Nature.

[51]  I. Perfecto.  Foraging behavior as a determinant of asymmetric competitive interaction between two ant species in a tropical agroecosystem , 1994, Oecologia.

[52]  M. J. Way,et al.  Role of Ants in Pest Management , 1992 .

[53]  N. Blüthgen,et al.  Sugar and amino acid composition of ant‐attended nectar and honeydew sources from an Australian rainforest , 2004 .

[54]  N. Blüthgen,et al.  Extrafloral nectaries in an Australian rainforest: structure and distribution , 2003 .

[55]  A. Dixon,et al.  Costs of ant attendance for aphids , 1998 .

[56]  N. Stork.  The composition of the arthropod fauna of Bornean lowland rain forest trees , 1991, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[57]  J. H. Fellers,et al.  Interference and Exploitation in a Guild of Woodland Ants , 1987 .

[58]  M. Percival.  TYPES OF NECTAR IN ANGIOSPERMS , 1961 .

[59]  R. Kohout.  A review of the distribution of the Polyrhachis and Echinopla ants of the Queensland wet tropics (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Formicinae). , 2000 .

[60]  K. Hoffmann,et al.  Ant-aphid mutualisms: the impact of honeydew production and honeydew sugar composition on ant preferences , 1999, Oecologia.

[61]  A. Dejean,et al.  arboreal ant mosaic in a cameroonian rainforest (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 2000 .

[62]  D. Davidson.  The role of resource imbalances in the evolutionary ecology of tropical arboreal ants , 1997 .

[63]  C. Fonseca,et al.  Asymmetries, compartments and null interactions in an Amazonian ant-plant community , 1996 .

[64]  M. Fuentes,et al.  How specialized are fruit-bird interactions ? Overlap of frugivore assemblages within and between plant species , 1995 .

[65]  K. Fiedler,et al.  The influence of ants on patterns of colonization and establishment within a set of coexisting lycaenid butterflies in a south-east Asian tropical rain forest , 1996, Oecologia.

[66]  K. Vepsäläinen,et al.  A competition hierarchy among boreal ants: impact on resource partitioning and community structure , 1988 .

[67]  H. G. Baker,et al.  A Comparison of the Amino Acid Complements of Floral and Extrafloral Nectars , 1978, Botanical Gazette.

[68]  A. Andersen,et al.  Meat ants as dominant members of Australian ant communities: an experimental test of their influence on the foraging success and forager abundance of other species , 1994, Oecologia.