Accelerating Chronically Unresponsive Children to Tier 3 Instruction

Response-to-intervention (RTI) approaches to disability identification are meant to put an end to the so-called wait-to-fail requirement associated with IQ discrepancy. However, in an unfortunate irony, there is a group of children who wait to fail in RTI frameworks. That is, they must fail both general classroom instruction (Tier 1) and small-group intervention (Tier 2) before becoming eligible for the most intensive intervention (Tier 3). The purpose of this article was to determine how to predict accurately which at-risk children will be unresponsive to Tiers 1 and 2, thereby allowing unresponsive children to move directly from Tier 1 to Tier 3. As part of an efficacy study of a multitier RTI approach to prevention and identification of reading disabilities (RD), 129 first-grade children who were unresponsive to classroom reading instruction were randomly assigned to 14 weeks of small-group, Tier 2 intervention. Nonresponders to this instruction (n = 33) were identified using local norms on first-grade word identification fluency growth linked to a distal outcome of RD at the end of second grade. Logistic regression models were used to predict membership in responder and nonresponder groups. Predictors were entered as blocks of data from least to most difficult to obtain: universal screening data, Tier 1 response data, norm referenced tests, and Tier 2 response data. Tier 2 response data were not necessary to classify students as responders and nonresponders to Tier 2 instruction, suggesting that some children can be accurately identified as eligible for Tier 3 intervention using only Tier 1 data, thereby avoiding prolonged periods of failure to instruction.

[1]  A. van der Leij,et al.  Predictors of Response to Intervention of Word Reading Fluency in Dutch , 2010, Journal of learning disabilities.

[2]  P. Satz,et al.  Early identification of learning disabled children: an old problem revisited. , 1988, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[3]  L. Fuchs,et al.  The “Blurring” of Special Education in a New Continuum of General Education Placements and Services , 2010 .

[4]  Douglas Fuchs,et al.  Responsiveness‐to‐Intervention: Definitions, Evidence, and Implications for the Learning Disabilities Construct , 2003 .

[5]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Treatment Validity as a Unifying Construct for Identifying Learning Disabilities , 2002 .

[6]  Evelyn S. Johnson,et al.  Screening for At-Risk Readers in a Response to Intervention Framework , 2007 .

[7]  Evelyn S. Johnson,et al.  How Can We Improve the Accuracy of Screening Instruments , 2009 .

[8]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Redefining Learning Disabilities as Inadequate Response to Instruction: The Promise and Potential Problems , 2003 .

[9]  Fredrick A. Schrank,et al.  Woodcock Diagnostic Reading Battery , 2008 .

[10]  D. Compton,et al.  Children at Risk for Reading Failure; Constructing an Early Screening Measure , 2007 .

[11]  D. Speece.  Hitting the Moving Target Known as Reading Development , 2005, Journal of learning disabilities.

[12]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Alternative approaches to the definition and identification of learning disabilities: Some questions and answers , 2004, Annals of dyslexia.

[13]  Anthony S. Bryk,et al.  Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods , 1992 .

[14]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Rethinking Response to Intervention at Middle and High School , 2010 .

[15]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Selecting At-Risk Readers in First Grade for Early Intervention: A Two-Year Longitudinal Study of Decision Rules and Procedures , 2006 .

[16]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Response to Varying Amounts of Time in Reading Intervention for Students With Low Response to Intervention , 2008, Journal of learning disabilities.

[17]  Laura A. Barquero,et al.  Selecting At-Risk First-Grade Readers for Early Intervention: Eliminating False Positives and Exploring the Promise of a Two-Stage Gated Screening Process. , 2010, Journal of educational psychology.

[18]  Carolyn A. Denton,et al.  WHY INTENSIVE INTERVENTIONS ARE NECESSARY FOR STUDENTS WITH SEVERE READING DIFFICULTIES. , 2010, Psychology in the schools.

[19]  D. P. Hurford,et al.  Early Identification of Children At Risk for Reading Disabilities , 1994, Journal of learning disabilities.

[20]  Kristen D. Ritchey,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Development of Oral Reading Fluency in Young Children At Risk for Reading Failure , 2005, Journal of learning disabilities.

[21]  John O. Willis,et al.  Test of Word Reading Efficiency , 2014 .

[22]  Lynn S. Fuchs,et al.  Introduction to Response to Intervention: What, Why, and How Valid Is It?. , 2006 .

[23]  Louis Danielson,et al.  Identification of learning disabilities : research to practice , 2002 .

[24]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using multivariate statistics, 5th ed. , 2007 .

[25]  H. Scarborough,et al.  Predicting, Explaining, and Preventing Children's Reading Difficulties , 2001 .

[26]  S. Vaughn,et al.  Students Demonstrating Persistent Low Response to Reading Intervention: Three Case Studies. , 2009 .

[27]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Monitoring Early Reading Development in First Grade: Word Identification Fluency versus Nonsense Word Fluency , 2004 .

[28]  T. Conway,et al.  Preventing reading failure in young children with phonological processing disabilities: Group and individual responses to instruction. , 1999 .

[29]  Beth A. Harn,et al.  Intensifying Instruction , 2008, Journal of learning disabilities.

[30]  Edward R. Sipay,et al.  Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers : Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific Reading disability , 1996 .

[31]  Jason L. Anthony,et al.  An Evaluation of Intensive Intervention for Students with Persistent Reading Difficulties , 2006, Journal of learning disabilities.

[32]  Marla F. Crawford.  Individuals with disabilities education improvement act of 2004 noncompliance determination complaints in commonwealth states , 2013 .

[33]  P. Tymms.  Baseline assessment, value‐added and the prediction of reading , 1999 .

[34]  Joseph K. Torgesen,et al.  Comprehensive Test of Phonological Processing , 1997 .

[35]  L. Fuchs.  Assessing Intervention Responsiveness: Conceptual and Technical Issues , 2003 .

[36]  M. Barnes,et al.  Assessment of Reading and Learning Disabilities A Research-Based Intervention-Oriented Approach , 2002 .

[37]  R. Abbott,et al.  Predicting Response to Early Reading Intervention From Verbal IQ, Reading-Related Language Abilities, Attention Ratings, and Verbal IQ—Word Reading Discrepancy , 2003, Journal of learning disabilities.