Modern Geometric Methods of Distance Determination

Building a 3D picture of the Universe at any distance is one of the major challenges in astronomy, from the nearby Solar System to distant Quasars and galaxies. This goal has forced astronomers to develop techniques to estimate or to measure the distance of point sources on the sky. While most distance estimates used since the beginning of the 20th century are based on our understanding of the physics of objects of the Universe: stars, galaxies, QSOs, the direct measures of distances are based on the geometric methods as developed in ancient Greece: the parallax, which has been applied to stars for the first time in the mid-19th century. In this review, different techniques of geometrical astrometry applied to various stellar and cosmological (Megamaser) objects are presented. They consist in parallax measurements from ground based equipment or from space missions, but also in the study of binary stars or, as we shall see, of binary systems in distant extragalactic sources using radio telescopes. The Gaia mission will be presented in the context of stellar physics and galactic structure, because this key space mission in astronomy will bring a breakthrough in our understanding of stars, galaxies and the Universe in their nature and evolution with time. Measuring the distance to a star is the starting point for an unbiased description of its physics and the estimate of its fundamental parameters like its age. Applying these studies to candles such as the Cepheids will impact our large distance studies and calibration of other candles. The text is constructed as follows: introducing the parallax concept and measurement, we shall present briefly the Gaia satellite which will be the future base catalogue of stellar astronomy in the near future. Cepheids will be discussed just after to demonstrate the state of the art in distance measurements in the Universe with these variable stars, with the objective of 1% of error in distances that could be applied to our closest galaxy the LMC, and better constrain the distances of large sub-structures around the Milky Way. Then exciting objects like X-Ray binaries will be presented in two parts corresponding to “low” or “high” mass stars with compact objects observed with X-ray satellites. We shall demonstrate the capability of these objects to have their distances measured with high accuracy with not only helps in the study of these objects but could also help to measure the distance of the structure they belong. For cosmological objects and large distances of megaparsecs, we shall present what has been developed for more than 20 years in the geometric distance measurements of MegaMasers, the ultimate goal being the estimation of the H0$H_{0}$ parameter.

[1]  Mark J. Reid,et al.  The megamaser cosmology project. I. very long baseline interferometric observations of UGC 3789 , 2009 .

[2]  C. Bailer-Jones,et al.  Estimating Distances from Parallaxes , 2015, 1507.02105.

[3]  Johannes Andersen,et al.  Accurate masses and radii of normal stars , 1991 .

[4]  B. Madore,et al.  A PHYSICALLY BASED METHOD FOR SCALING CEPHEID LIGHT CURVES FOR FUTURE DISTANCE DETERMINATIONS , 2010, 1006.2317.

[5]  D. Psaltis,et al.  Thermonuclear (Type I) X-Ray Bursts Observed by the Rossi X-Ray Timing Explorer , 2006, astro-ph/0608259.

[6]  M. Reid,et al.  THE MEGAMASER COSMOLOGY PROJECT. VIII. A GEOMETRIC DISTANCE TO NGC 5765b , 2015, 1511.08311.

[7]  E.P.J. van den Heuvel,et al.  Catalogue of high-mass X-ray binaries in the Galaxy (4th edition) , 2006 .

[8]  P. A. Maurone,et al.  The Distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud from the Eclipsing Binary HV 2274 , 1998, astro-ph/9809132.

[9]  G. Duvert,et al.  Pseudomagnitude Distances: Application to the Pleiades cluster , 2016, 1607.06378.

[10]  P. Morel,et al.  Fundamental properties of the Population II fiducial stars HD 122563 and Gmb 1830 from CHARA interferometric observations , 2012, 1207.5954.

[11]  A. Helmi,et al.  A box full of chocolates: The rich structure of the nearby stellar halo revealed by Gaia and RAVE , 2016, 1611.00222.

[12]  On the X-ray and optical properties of the Be star HD 110432 : a very hard-thermal X-ray emitter , 2007, astro-ph/0701767.

[13]  M. Reid,et al.  THE MEGAMASER COSMOLOGY PROJECT. III. ACCURATE MASSES OF SEVEN SUPERMASSIVE BLACK HOLES IN ACTIVE GALAXIES WITH CIRCUMNUCLEAR MEGAMASER DISKS , 2010, 1008.2146.

[14]  F. Thevenin,et al.  Stellar Iron Abundances: Non-LTE Effects , 1999, astro-ph/9906433.

[15]  G. Benedetto,et al.  Predicting accurate stellar angular diameters by the near-infrared surface brightness technique , 2005 .

[16]  C. Barache,et al.  Gaia Data Release 1: Astrometry - one billion positions, two million proper motions and parallaxes , 2016, 1609.04303.

[17]  L. Althaus,et al.  White dwarf mass distribution in the SDSS , 2006 .

[18]  R. Robinson,et al.  A Multiwavelength Campaign on γ Cassiopeiae. III. The Case for Magnetically Controlled Circumstellar Kinematics , 1999 .

[19]  Frank Haberl,et al.  New γ Cassiopeiae-like objects: X-ray and optical observations of SAO 49725 and HD 161103 , 2006, astro-ph/0603098.

[20]  K. Lo MEGA-MASERS AND GALAXIES , 2005 .

[21]  E. al.,et al.  Spectroscopic survey of the Galaxy with Gaia– I. Design and performance of the Radial Velocity Spectrometer , 2004, astro-ph/0409709.

[22]  M. Reid,et al.  The Megamaser Cosmology Project: I. VLBI observations of UGC 3789 , 2008, 0811.4345.

[23]  M. Catelán,et al.  THE ARAUCARIA PROJECT: A STUDY OF THE CLASSICAL CEPHEID IN THE ECLIPSING BINARY SYSTEM OGLE LMC562.05.9009 IN THE LARGE MAGELLANIC CLOUD , 2015, 1511.02826.

[24]  I. Ribas,et al.  On the binary nature of the γ-ray sources AGL J2241+4454 (= MWC 656) and HESS J0632+057 (= MWC 148) , 2012, 1201.1726.

[25]  Sergey E. Koposov,et al.  Gaia 1 and 2. A pair of new Galactic star clusters , 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[26]  H. Bond,et al.  THREE ANCIENT HALO SUBGIANTS: PRECISE PARALLAXES, COMPOSITIONS, AGES, AND IMPLICATIONS FOR GLOBULAR CLUSTERS,, , 2014, 1407.7591.

[27]  B. F. Madore,et al.  The period-luminosity relation. IV. Intrinsic relations and reddenings for the Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheids. , 1982 .

[28]  F. V. Leeuwen Validation of the new Hipparcos reduction , 2007, 0708.1752.

[29]  M. Reid,et al.  THE MEGAMASER COSMOLOGY PROJECT. V. AN ANGULAR-DIAMETER DISTANCE TO NGC 6264 AT 140 Mpc , 2012, 1207.7273.

[30]  R. Kudritzki,et al.  An eclipsing-binary distance to the Large Magellanic Cloud accurate to two per cent , 2013, Nature.

[31]  A. Parmar,et al.  A comparison of the X-ray properties of X Per and gamma Cas , 1982 .

[32]  M. Catelán,et al.  THE ARAUCARIA PROJECT: THE FIRST-OVERTONE CLASSICAL CEPHEID IN THE ECLIPSING SYSTEM OGLE-LMC-CEP-2532 , 2015, 1504.04611.

[33]  C. Motch,et al.  gamma Cassiopeiae: an X-ray Be star with personality , 2009, 0903.2600.

[34]  J. M. Moran,et al.  A geometric distance to the galaxy NGC4258 from orbital motions in a nuclear gas disk , 1999, Nature.

[35]  M. Reid,et al.  THE MEGAMASER COSMOLOGY PROJECT. IX. BLACK HOLE MASSES FOR THREE MASER GALAXIES , 2016, 1610.06802.

[36]  J. Zinn,et al.  Asteroseismology and Gaia: Testing Scaling Relations Using 2200 Kepler Stars with TGAS Parallaxes , 2017, 1705.04697.

[37]  R. Neuhauser,et al.  A catalogue of young runaway Hipparcos stars within 3 kpc from the Sun , 2010, 1007.4883.

[38]  D. Bersier,et al.  Cepheid distances from infrared long-baseline interferometry III. Calibration of the surface brightness-color relations , 2004 .

[39]  Ian W. Roxburgh,et al.  The PLATO mission concept , 2007 .

[40]  A. Kottas,et al.  THE NEUTRON STAR MASS DISTRIBUTION , 2010, 1011.4291.

[41]  B. Paczynski,et al.  Cluster AgeS Experiment: The Age and Distance of the Globular Cluster ω Centauri Determined from Observations of the Eclipsing Binary OGLEGC 17 , 2000, astro-ph/0012493.

[42]  Guillermo Torres,et al.  BINARY ORBIT, PHYSICAL PROPERTIES, AND EVOLUTIONARY STATE OF CAPELLA (α AURIGAE) , 2009, 0906.0977.

[43]  A. Cumming,et al.  Intermediate long X-ray bursts from the ultra-compact binary candidate SLX 1737-282 , 2007, 0711.0328.

[44]  Walter H. G. Lewin,et al.  X-ray bursts , 1993 .

[45]  On the discrepancy between asteroseismic and Gaia DR1 TGAS parallaxes , 2017, 1705.09063.

[46]  The Megamaser Cosmology Project. VI. Observations of NGC 6323 , 2014, 1411.5106.

[47]  Olivier Chesneau,et al.  Pseudomagnitudes and Differential Surface Brightness: Application to the apparent diameter of stars , 2016, 1604.07700.

[48]  M. Reid,et al.  THE MEGAMASER COSMOLOGY PROJECT. IV. A DIRECT MEASUREMENT OF THE HUBBLE CONSTANT FROM UGC 3789 , 2012, 1207.7292.

[49]  L. Titarchuk,et al.  DETERMINATION OF BLACK HOLE MASSES IN GALACTIC BLACK HOLE BINARIES USING SCALING OF SPECTRAL AND VARIABILITY CHARACTERISTICS , 2009, 0902.2852.

[50]  B. Madore,et al.  Physical parameters and the projection factor of the classical Cepheid in the binary system OGLE-LMC-CEP-0227 , 2013, 1308.5023.

[51]  et al,et al.  Discovery of the Binary Pulsar PSR B1259-63 in Very-High-Energy Gamma Rays around Periastron with H.E.S.S , 2005 .

[52]  F. Thevenin,et al.  The angular sizes of dwarf stars and subgiants Surface brightness relations calibrated by interferometry , 2004, astro-ph/0404180.

[53]  R. E. Wilson,et al.  Photometric Solutions for Detached Eclipsing Binaries: Selection of Ideal Distance Indicators in the Small Magellanic Cloud , 2001, astro-ph/0105469.

[54]  European Southern Observatory,et al.  A purely geometric distance to the binary star Atlas, a member of the Pleiades , 2004 .

[55]  W. E. Harris,et al.  Photospheric radius expansion X-ray bursts as standard candles , 2002, astro-ph/0212028.

[56]  N. Mowlavi,et al.  Gaia Data Release 1 - The Cepheid & RR Lyrae star pipeline and its application to the south ecliptic pole region , 2016, 1609.04269.

[57]  R. I. Anderson,et al.  The Araucaria Project: High-precision orbital parallax and masses of the eclipsing binary TZ~Fornacis , 2015, 1511.07971.

[58]  P. G. Jonker,et al.  The distances to Galactic low-mass X-ray binaries: consequences for black hole luminosities and kicks , 2004 .

[59]  W. Gieren,et al.  THE ARAUCARIA PROJECT. OGLE-LMC-CEP-1718: AN EXOTIC ECLIPSING BINARY SYSTEM COMPOSED OF TWO CLASSICAL OVERTONE CEPHEIDS IN A 413 DAY ORBIT , 2014, 1403.3617.

[60]  R. Kudritzki,et al.  THE ARAUCARIA PROJECT. THE DISTANCE TO THE SMALL MAGELLANIC CLOUD FROM LATE-TYPE ECLIPSING BINARIES , 2013, 1311.2340.

[61]  B. Pilecki,et al.  The dynamical mass of a classical Cepheid variable star in an eclipsing binary system , 2010, Nature.

[62]  K. Y. Lo,et al.  THE MEGAMASER COSMOLOGY PROJECT. II. THE ANGULAR-DIAMETER DISTANCE TO UGC 3789 , 2010, 1005.1955.

[63]  W. Lewin,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) X-ray bursts at extreme mass accretion rates from GX 17 + 2 , 2002 .