Towards a visual recognition threshold: New instrument shows humans identify animals with only 1ms of visual exposure

The human visual system is very adept at extracting categorical information from complex scenes with only the briefest of exposure. Here we show that information from visual scenes can be processed to the level of identification with formally unattainable, ultra-brief (1ms) presentations. This brief presentation time is afforded by a new instrument, the light-emitting diode (LED) tachistoscope, in which a liquid crystal display (LCD) is illuminated externally by a brief LED flash after LCD steady-state is reached, such that image onset and offset timing can be precisely controlled. Photographs of animals were presented with or without backgrounds for 1ms and 10ms. The results indicate that visual recognition of objects benefits from presenting them in isolation rather than with a background at smaller (1ms) durations. In both conditions, however, animals could be recognised at 1ms at least 83% of the time, possibly due to iconic memory and top-down, feedback mechanisms.

[1]  Denis Fize,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[2]  Philip M. Merikle,et al.  Processing time and memory for pictures. , 1976 .

[3]  Jodi L. Davenport.  Consistency effects between objects in scenes , 2007, Memory & cognition.

[4]  Wilhelm R. Glaser,et al.  Technical improvements to the projection tachistoscope , 1988 .

[5]  Susan Johnson,et al.  Measuring projection tachistoscope shutter characteristics , 1991 .

[6]  M. Bar,et al.  Top-down predictions in the cognitive brain , 2007, Brain and Cognition.

[7]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Feedforward, horizontal, and feedback processing in the visual cortex , 1998, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[8]  A. Pollatsek,et al.  Identification of objects in scenes: the role of scene background in object naming. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  E. Rolls,et al.  The Neurophysiology of Backward Visual Masking: Information Analysis , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  S. Thorpe,et al.  The Time Course of Visual Processing: From Early Perception to Decision-Making , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  D. Kahneman.  Method, findings, and theory in studies of visual masking. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  Nancy Hutner,et al.  Comparing visual perception on conventional cabinet tachistoscopes and computer monitor tachistoscopes , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[13]  D. I. Perrett,et al.  Out of sight but not out of mind: the neurophysiology of iconic memory in the superior temporal sulcus , 2005, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[14]  J. Duncan,et al.  On the time course of perceptual information that results from a brief visual presentation. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  S. Thorpe,et al.  The time course of visual processing: Backward masking and natural scene categorisation , 2005, Vision Research.

[16]  P Naish.  An electromechanical optical shutter. , 1979, Journal of physics E: Scientific instruments.

[17]  VanrullenRufin,et al.  The Time Course of Visual Processing: From Early Perception to Decision-Making , 2001 .

[18]  V. Lamme,et al.  The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[19]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Visual Awareness: A Linking Proposition , 2000 .

[20]  Olivier R. Joubert,et al.  How long to get to the “gist” of real-world natural scenes? , 2005 .

[21]  G R Loftus,et al.  How much is an icon worth? , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Vladimir Mitin,et al.  Fast switching of light-emitting diodes , 2000 .

[23]  Stefan Wiens,et al.  Visual masking in magnetic resonance imaging , 2005, NeuroImage.

[24]  Tutis Vilis,et al.  Segregation and persistence of form in the lateral occipital complex , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  B G Breitmeyer,et al.  Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing. , 1976, Psychological review.

[26]  G. W. Snedecor.  Statistical Methods , 1964 .

[27]  P. Fldik,et al.  The Speed of Sight , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  V. Lamme.  Why visual attention and awareness are different , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  Árni Kristjánsson,et al.  Readout From Iconic Memory and Selective Spatial Attention Involve Similar Neural Processes , 2007, Psychological science.

[30]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  Separate neural definitions of visual consciousness and visual attention; a case for phenomenal awareness , 2004, Neural Networks.

[31]  Jodi L. Davenport,et al.  Scene Consistency in Object and Background Perception , 2004, Psychological science.

[32]  J. Umeda,et al.  Response times of light-emitting diodes , 1972 .

[33]  Michelle R. Greene,et al.  The Briefest of Glances: The Time Course of Natural Scene Understanding , 2009 .

[34]  Clementine Thurgood,et al.  Development of a light-emitting diode tachistoscope. , 2010, The Review of scientific instruments.