Comments on 'The cooked and the raw' by R. Hammarberg

that this calls for a reply, though I cannot do so in philosophical terms such as his. I have always tried to be an experimental scientist, and I am not a philosopher ; I have read much philosophy but, like Omar Khayyam, &dquo;evermore came out by the same door wherein I went&dquo;. Hammarberg tries to discount my definition of ’information’ by equating it with ’raw, brute facts’ (which I did not do) and does not himself define such a term. He also accuses me of ’founda-