Ecological discounting

Which rates should we use to discount costs and benefits of different natures at different time horizons? We answer this question by considering a representative agent consuming two goods whose availability evolves over time in a stochastic way. We extend the Ramsey rule by taking into account the degree of substitutability between the two goods and of the uncertainty surrounding the economic and environmental growths. The rate at which environmental impacts should be discounted is in general different from the one at which monetary benefits should be discounted. We provide arguments in favor of an ecological discount rate smaller than the economic discount rate. In particular, we show that, under certainty and Cobb-Douglas preferences, the difference between the economic and the ecological discount rates equals the difference between the economic and the ecological growth rates. Using data about the link between biodiversity and economic development, I estimate that the rate at which changes in biodiversity should be discounted is 1.5%, whereas changes in consumption should be discounted at 3.2%.

[1]  Liliana B. Andonova,et al.  2005 Environmental Sustainability Index Benchmarking National Environmental Stewardship Appendix A Methodology , 2005 .

[2]  Ekaterini Panopoulou,et al.  An Econometric Approach To Estimating Long-Run Discount Rates , 2004 .

[3]  J. Drèze.  Inferring Risk Tolerance from Deductibles in Insurance Contracts , 1981 .

[4]  Louis Eeckhoudt,et al.  Putting risk in its proper place , 2006 .

[5]  R. Guesnerie.  Calcul economique et developpement durable , 2004 .

[6]  A. Tchen.  Inequalities for distributions with given marginals , 1976 .

[7]  Miles S. Kimball,et al.  Standard Risk Aversion , 1991 .

[8]  Satishs Iyengar,et al.  Multivariate Models and Dependence Concepts , 1998 .

[9]  Christian Gollier,et al.  The consumption-based determinants of the term structure of discount rates , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[10]  Hans-Peter Weikard,et al.  Discounting and environmental quality: When should dual rates be used? , 2005 .

[11]  Thomas Sterner,et al.  Discounting and relative prices , 2007 .

[12]  John A. List,et al.  The Environmental Kuznets Curve: Real Progress or Misspecified Models? , 2003, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[13]  Christian P. Traeger.  Sustainability, limited substitutability, and non-constant social discount rates , 2008 .

[14]  Edmond Malinvaud,et al.  CAPITAL ACCUMULATION AND EFFICIENT ALLOCATION OF RESOURCES , 1953 .

[15]  Antoine Bommier.  Risk Aversion, Intertemporal Elasticity of Substitution and Correlation Aversion , 2005 .

[16]  J. Pratt.  RISK AVERSION IN THE SMALL AND IN THE LARGE11This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (grant NSF-G24035). Reproduction in whole or in part is permitted for any purpose of the United States Government. , 1964 .

[17]  M. Weitzman.  Subjective Expectations and Asset-Return Puzzles , 2007 .

[18]  Louis Eeckhoudt,et al.  A Good Sign for Multivariate Risk Taking , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[19]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Good News and Bad News: Representation Theorems and Applications , 1981 .

[20]  Christian Gollier,et al.  Time Horizon and the Discount Rate , 1999, J. Econ. Theory.

[21]  N. Kocherlakota.  The Equity Premium: It’s Still a Puzzle , 1999 .

[22]  M. Rothschild,et al.  Increasing risk: I. A definition , 1970 .

[23]  Thomas Sterner,et al.  An Even Sterner Review: Introducing Relative Prices into the Discounting Debate , 2008, Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

[24]  T. Sterner.  Introducing Relative Prices into the Discounting Debate , 2007 .

[25]  Miles S. Kimball.  Precautionary Saving in the Small and in the Large , 1989 .